#trextiles

For example. You know how you can make holographic chocolate by pouring it into molds with specific groove patterns? A replicator could do that to cloth, by selectively smoothing and thickening individual fibers.

We could design a boiled wool coat with patches that flash in the light like butterfly wings, because the felt has been precisely embossed with those very very tiny ridges. With no hard edge between the matte and shiny areas, just a smooth gradient from flat grey wool to subtle abalone-shell iridescence to vibrant, shifting colors.

But we could do even wilder stuff than this. Let’s go back to holographic chocolate for a second: it’s called holographic, but why? Where’s the hologram? It just looks kind of rainbow-y.

The answer, shockingly, is that we actually can stamp a 3D hologram into chocolate, but the diffraction pattern required to do that is a lot more complicated, so it doesn’t transfer as well. Luckily, we aren’t stamping the design into a surface. We’re materializing it directly.

So we could make a set of fleece footie pajamas etched with a holographic skeleton THAT LOOKS LIKE A SKELETON FROM ALL VIEWING ANGLES. We could make a t-shirt with an entire goddamn aquarium “inside”, with holographic fish that swim around as the viewer moves. We could make wacky eye-melting nonsense, 3D geometries that fold and warp and knot around themselves at the slightest breeze.

All with no electronics, no exotic materials. Just bumps on cloth.

Cotton, linen, and even wool can be shiny. Shine is related to how long and thin the underlying fibers are. Any time there’s thicker fibers or a break in the fibers, it casts shadows and scatters light, creating a more matte finish. Longer, thinner fibers lie flatter, bouncing light straight back to the source, creating a more reflective surface.

The problem, of course, is that long, thin fibers are difficult to handle without breaking them. Even after you sort out all the staples that got cut short during shearing/harvesting, the long staples have to survive the rest of the processing and weaving. This is why we assume shiny fabric must be synthetic (or silk). These fibers begin as long continuous strands and are strong enough to stay unbroken as machines move them around.

We can make shiny cotton, it’s just difficult and expensive. And the shine draws attention to any stains, runs, fuzzing, and other tiny defects, so even though longer-staple fabrics are technically stronger, they start to look shabby if they aren’t maintained very carefully. So we usually save this difficult and expensive process for bedsheets and formalwear, where we can benefit from the increased quality without having to maintain its flawless appearance over daily wear.

Both of these problems are solved by replicators. A replicator isn’t manipulating very long, very fine staples and trying not to break them, it can just materialize them into their final positions. And if those fine fibers get damaged or stained, just pop that corner into a replicator and it’s good as new.

The replicator patterns for clothing would be extremely complicated, and a tailor would want them to be fully parametric. For some projects, you’d want editable splines for every single knit stitch, every weaving crossover, even the twist of the underlying threads. Each edit could be applied independently, repeated over a selected patch of fabric, or applied to every stitch matching a specific set of rules. The computer has to recalculate all the geometries in the entire garment whenever you redraw the base textile repeat. Pick a slightly more or less elastic material, and any stretchy areas need to be re-flowed to meet your fitting constraints. Sketch in some lace trim at the bottom and now you’re getting alerts to stiffen the shoulders so the extra weight doesn’t create any pressure points.