Tradaxio Review: Legit Broker or Just Another Scam?
Today we present a Tradaxio review: an honest look at a Forex/CFD broker that proudly advertises itself as a provider of next-generation trading: faster, smarter, more intense. Of course, clients are promised incredible conditions: zero trading commissions, spreads starting from 0 pips, and order execution in under 10 milliseconds. Impressive, certainly, but we are not convinced that such generous offers are entirely truthful. To ensure our readers do not fall into yet another scam trap, we decided to examine how trustworthy this platform really is. Everything we managed to find out is presented below.
Does Tradaxio Show Any Risk Factors?
On the brokerâs official website, we see numerous statements about compliance with the law and holding a valid license. At first glance, the arguments appear quite convincing:
The broker allegedly belongs to Tropicana Capital Market Ltd, a company registered on the island of Mwali (Moheli), Comoros Union, under number HV00725368.
The local regulator, Mwali International Services Authority (MISA), has issued it license No. BFX2025093 to provide brokerage services, including retail Forex.
The information is fairly detailed, and it is sufficient to run a check in the registries of the autonomous island of Mwali, part of the Comoros Union. A record of the company and its license is indeed published on the MISA website.
The company registration number matches the one stated on Tradaxioâs website, as does the license number issued to the firm on January 24, 2025. Essentially, we have confirmation that Tropicana Capital Market Ltd is registered and holds regulatory documents from the local authority.
However, the only source stating that the broker actually belongs to this company is the broker itself. The regulatorâs registry contains no links to the firmâs website. There is also no other evidence that the company is connected to the platform we are reviewing. Therefore, we cannot confidently state that the brokerage activities are conducted within the legal framework of even the offshore Mwali jurisdiction.
Take note! We cannot even be certain that the information we see comes from the official regulatorâs registry. The problem is that there are at least two websites online that look identical: mwaliregistrar.com and mwaliregistrar.net. Both claim to be the official web resource of the regulator and accuse the other of being a phishing site. The only practical difference for us is that one displays data about the company, while the other contains absolutely no information on any license issued after December 2024.
Unlike the registration details, the brokerâs website does not mention the date of establishment. However, we saw that the company was registered and licensed in January 2025. To find out how long it has existed online, we turn to Whois records.
We can see that the active domain tradaxio.com was registered on 19 June 2025, and the brokerâs website was deployed on the same day. In practice, this means the broker has been online for only about six months. This is hardly enough time to earn the communityâs trust. It is also rather strange that a company that supposedly obtained a license in January started providing services under it only five months later. This looks like yet another argument suggesting that Tradaxio does not actually belong to Tropicana Capital Market Ltd.
However, the websiteâs contact section states that this company is the one administering the domain. At the same time, we cannot identify which firm provides hosting services for the site, nor can we claim that it conducts any meaningful verification of client data. Without this, it is impossible to guarantee the reliability of information submitted to the hosting provider.
It is also worth noting that the first Tradaxio review appeared only about two months ago. This clearly shows that the platform started operating very recently. Nevertheless, the total number of comments on reviews.io has already exceeded twenty, and all of them are positive. Such activity is unnatural: this is roughly 1.5 glowing posts per day. In reality, users are much more likely to leave complaints, and far less frequently. Both this pattern and the content of the posts strongly indicate that these reviews are paid for by the project owners, who need to build a positive reputation for their venture. This is a typical tactic used by scam brokers.
Letâs Break Down the Jurisdiction
We believe that any broker claiming to be fully regulated and presenting an MISA license as proof should be viewed critically. Yes, the company may indeed possess an official-looking document. But what does it actually mean?
The main financial regulator of the Comoros Union is the Banque Centrale des Comores (BCC). In its official statements, the BCC repeatedly points out that MISA has no authority to regulate financial activity. For example, in a communique dated 15 June 2022, the BCC states:
MISA is a commercial entity.
Licenses are issued not after verification, but simply upon payment.
The documents received by brokers and other financial services are essentially fake.
In other words, even under the national legislation of the Comoros Union, companies operating under an MISA license are acting illegally.
MISA itself refers to the special autonomous status of the island of Mwali (Moheli) and claims it can license any financial company, including banks and brokers. In practice, this is merely an attempt to exploit a legal loophole. The BCC insists that autonomy does not imply independence from regulatory oversight.
Global regulators and industry experts likewise do not recognize MISA as a valid regulatory authority or acknowledge the legitimacy of its licenses. The issue is not only the questionable status of the organization but also the complete absence of client protection requirements. Brokers holding an MISA license are not required to:
Keep client funds on segregated accounts.
Participate in compensation schemes.
Provide regular financial reporting or public disclosures.
Moreover, MISA does not conduct audits, does not perform inspections, and does not possess any tools to enforce compliance. In effect, the âregulatorâ exists only as a façade: it issues documents and allows brokers to claim they are regulated.
Thus, an MISA license is not a safety guarantee. It functions as a marketing device, but it offers no legal protection to clients. Moreover, statistics show that among companies operating under this license, the proportion of outright fraudsters is extremely high.
What Does the Tradaxio.com Website Reveal?
At first glance, the brokerâs official website looks quite decent. A clean white background, neat information blocks, fast loading speed â everything suggests careful work by the web designers. However, in 2025, this is hardly impressive: there are plenty of WordPress templates, and creating a visually appealing website can be done in a couple of evenings with minimal effort.
This is why, for a serious broker, something else matters far more â high-quality content. And this is where Tradaxio begins to encounter significant problems.
To start with, the website contains only four informational pages, including the Home Page. It is reasonable to doubt that this is enough even for a basic introduction to the company. Moreover, it is simply impossible to fit all the information traders expect onto so few pages. And even within the limited space available, the developers failed to use it properly and did not attempt to provide essential details. For example:
The structure of the main page resembles a promotional brochure. Bright slogans, bold promises, and loud statements about âThe New Generation of Trading,â but not a single concrete offer or verifiable fact.
There is no About Us page at all. As a result, users cannot find any information about the company: no history, no team, no future plans. More substantial details are also missing, such as payment information or financial reporting. An unconventional approach â though we doubt potential Tradaxio clients will find it reassuring.
There is no page dedicated to markets and trading instruments. The broker allocates only a few short lines on the homepage to the markets it supposedly provides. The website has neither a list of available assets nor contract specifications. The only thing a trader can learn from the main page is that out of the 100 instruments offered, 50 are currency pairs and 15 are major global indices.
The broker provides no news feed, no analytics, and none of the essential tools such as an economic calendar. Even educational materials for beginners are missing. Clearly, the company is not interested in the trading success of its clients.
The list of what this near-empty website lacks could go on much longer. We will leave that pleasure to other visitors. Instead, we will highlight another detail: it is impossible to register with the broker independently. The registration form includes a mandatory field â Referral Code. Since the firm does not even mention having a partnership program, it is obvious that the code can be obtained only by contacting customer support.
We are confident that professionals will quickly understand who is actually meant to trade with this broker, and who will look at Tradaxioâs offering, draw the correct conclusions, and move on to a more transparent and trustworthy company. The former may receive help; the latter will likely not get answers to even basic questions.
We have seen this approach many times among scam brokers. Something tells us that Tradaxio, even if it truly holds a license, is not far removed from them.
Is the Broker Offering Fair or Risky Terms for Traders?
When browsing the Tradaxio website, it is hard to shake the feeling that the owners of the platform have no real understanding of the business they are trying to operate. Otherwise, why do we see the same situation with trading conditions as with the rest of the information: it is either missing, or buried under attractive wording with no actual substance behind it.
For example, on the Our Plans page, the company provides nothing more than a list of account types, the size of the minimum deposit for each, and a set of vague options. Clients are offered a choice of five plans:
Discovery, with a starting deposit of $10,000.
Evolution, where trading begins from $50,000.
Mastery, requiring a minimum deposit of $100,000.
Visionary, with a balance of at least $500,000.
Club Privilege, intended for traders who can deposit $1,000,000 or more.
This looks polished and creates the illusion that the broker has a well-designed system for traders of all levels. However, this is nothing more than a decorative façade hiding the real situation. The list of options does not mention anything that actually matters, such as:
Maximum leverage.
Spread sizes.
Swap calculation methods and trading commissions.
Minimum and maximum trade volumes.
Margin Call / Stop Out thresholds.
In other words, the trader is simply not given the tools to assess potential profitability, costs, or risk levels. Quite literally, they are being told to start trading blind.
The intention here is obvious. This is a convenient tactic for scammers: the client must open an account, deposit funds, and only then discover that the trading conditions are far less favorable than what the companyâs representatives promised. The logic is simple: the client must lose money with the broker, rather than realize at the outset that the platform is unprofitable and walk away.
Instead of meaningful trading specifications, the client is fed marketing bait designed to attract inexperienced traders:
Daily signals.
A âTrading Academyâ.
Courses and webinars, etc.
Naturally, unlike regulated brokers, none of this is actually free. No, the company does not charge for these separately, but they become available only with a deposit of $100,000 or more. The appetites of this projectâs owners speak for themselves.
A side note: the options list for all account types mentions that commissions apply. We are curious how this aligns with the claims on the homepage about zero spreads and zero commissions.
But we have no illusions about what we are looking at. These are not altruists willing to operate at a loss. This is a typical example of a scam broker, where attractive promises act as a storefront to hide the true goal: taking every dollar that clients deposit.
Technical Support Analysis of Tradaxio
The brokerâs contact information is just as poor as everything else. One of the four informational pages on the website is dedicated to ways of getting in touch with the companyâs representatives. And what do we see there? Only a form for submitting a support request.
We understand that you would expect to see a phone number, a live chat, or at least an email address. However, the projectâs creators apparently decided that their employees must be shielded from bothersome clients. Let users submit tickets, and the staff will respond only when they have spare time and/or feel like it. In our case, that moment never came: we submitted a request for a Referral Code, and a week later we still received no reply.
Interestingly, the documents contain no contact information either. The only thing we found was a repeated reference to the Mwali (Moheli) address, which the company lists as its registration location. Well, we know this address by heart already â every company registered on this autonomous island in the Comoros Union uses it. And even here Tradaxio managed to distinguish itself: apparently writing out the full string felt like too much effort, so the address is shortened by almost half, making it impossible to locate the company even by its supposed place of registration.
It is also worth noting that the company provides no links to any social media pages. It now seems obvious that we are dealing with a scam project that does not need a genuine influx of interested clients, including from social networks. Why would employees waste time filling out profiles and maintaining groups and channels, when they could instead be making persuasive phone calls describing how quickly, easily, and abundantly one can earn on this platform?
And that is most likely exactly what they are doing. Unfortunately, this approach tends to work well for scammers.
Strengths and Weaknesses
The company provides information about the official registration of the entity that allegedly manages the broker, as well as its license.
The website pages are reasonably well-designed.
We found no evidence that the company officially registered and licensed as stated on the website is actually connected to the broker.
The license in question is not recognized by regulators, experts, or experienced traders.
Trading conditions are not disclosed at all.
The company provides no contact details.
The owners of the platform have paid for fake positive reviews about its services.
