Assignments week 2
Origin of language
āDevelopmentally, dialogue comes before monologue, both for the human species and for the human individualā. - assignment origin of language week 2
I feel like that the reason that dialogue comes before monologue is that I see dialogue as the origin of language instead of monologue as the origin of language. You actually need communication between different people to create the language. This creates a language known by multiple people, who can spread the meaning of the words and sentences to others.Ā
For example, little children learn a language from the communication between their parents and themselves. Later on they learn from the communication with others like siblings, friends or teachers. Through this manner of learning the language is being spread to others and correcting into the right way.Ā
This is a great example on why you should start with dialogue while learning an new and foreign language. Start this with easy questions such asĀ āWhat did you do during the weekendā orĀ āWhat is your favorite movie or sportsā, and let the student answer this. If the student understand this, he or she will answer you. If they donāt understand you can help him or her by correcting the mistakes.Ā
Monologues can actually be quite negative towards new learners, because when a student doesnāt grasp the language to a certain level yet he or she may not be confident enough to carry out the monologue by himself or herself. This could even lead to a disliking towards the language.Ā
Thought language
Yes, I do think that people think in language. Your thoughts are at least being translated in your head, which may seem hard to explain, but how else would you be able to tell a story if you donāt think in a language. In some cases this may be in a form of pictures instead of words. In which language people think, differs from person to person. I personally think in two languages, Dutch and English, but it really differs on the situation that Iām in. Right now Iām thinking in English because Iām writing in English right now. I think in Dutch when Iām talking to people who speak Dutch.
But if we consider the fact that we need to be able to think to form words, wouldnāt that already answer the question of people thinking in languages? Everything you say has been thought about, maybe not consciously but without thinking you wouldnāt have come up with that specific word. So yes, I think people so think in a certain language and sometimes even more than one language.Ā
Dreams
It has been proves that people dream, and that those dreams are thoughts while you are asleep. We stated in the paragraphĀ āThoughtsā that people think in a certain language, so I would say that people also dream in a language.Ā
What language people dream in, would also differ from person to person, but I feel like itās safe to say that this would be their native language since dreaming happens in the subconsciousness instead of the awake active part of the brain. However, I know from personal experience that itās possible to dream in different languages.Ā
This is the same for blind or deaf people, because a blind person has amazing hearing and can grasp a language that way instead of seeing the actual words instead. So, it seems logical that blind people would dream in the language they have heard the most since that would be their native language.Ā
Deaf people are a different section in this subject, since they canāt hear a language but just see the words. Would that mean that they donāt dream in words? They have their own language, sign language, so that could mean that they dream in that language instead.Ā
People donāt only dream in language but also in images andĀ āpicturesā. Blind and deaf people have altered these things in their sleep but are still experiencing a version of this.
Resources
http://deafblindness.blogspot.nl/2010/06/how-deafblind-think-and-dream.htmlĀ













