#tervo

我也不知道这算什么

doodle

International Kissing Day

Pt. 3

Due to Tumblr's 30-image limit per post, this exposé has been divided into three parts. Click here for Part 1 and Part 2

When the victim's friend, who is another one of Cake's victims, joined this Solar Opposites Creativity Discord server several months prior, he was instantly kicked out. According to his testimony, all he shared was one SFW piece of his art, which people liked. Although he had no intention of sharing his pro-ship art, his pro-ship status was what immediately got him kicked. No questions asked.

Below is the second last page in Cake's 2025 Google Document. Charlotte's final image spread like wildfire on social media. The victim's friend may have known, but this does not prove that Terrence knew or that they are the same person. Regardless, Cake pretends to care about transgender people until she targets her victim. As we saw on her Lol account, there was much deadnaming, misgendering, speculation about Terrence being trans, and the belief that a transgender person's choice to stealth should antagonize them.

Notice how Cake has heavily monitored Terrence's posts. She mentions every little piece of drama but completely ignores what happened to Terrence between May 29th and June 1st, going so far as to not list the post she replied directly to by block evading him with her Lol account, where Terrence outed her and Shroomers as predators, which would have been a perfect post for her Google Doc.

Now think back to all the tweets Cake's Lol account posted. If you need a refresher, click here. (Ctrl + Click) Notice how none of these tweets accuse Terence of being a predator. If Cake genuinely believed these allegations at the time, why were they never mentioned to Cassie, Shroomers, or in the Discord server where Cake bullied the victim into leaving? Why did she wait five months after allegedly learning this information before making such serious accusations public?

This is because the predatory allegations against minors were completely fabricated and used as revenge against Terrence for calling Cake and Shroomers out for discussing an adult show with minors. Despite the clear evidence against Shroomers, Cake was quick to defend them. Considering Cake's public mockery of CSA victims and willingness to discuss Solar Opposites with minors, it is obvious Cake is not motivated by concern for protecting children.

Many were quick to believe these allegations. The "friends" of one of the victims of these allegations immediately abandoned them without verifying these accusations with them. Almost a year has passed since the incident, yet Cake's supporters continue to harass these victims.

Yao, the minor who Cake frequently claims was groomed, later shared a screenshot of their former friend's (the victim's) Instagram profile that showed they were 18 when they first met, while Yao was 15 (as confirmed by the birth date listed on Yao's Strawpage). According to the victim, Yao told them they were 16 because in some parts of China, they count the nine-month gestation period as a year.

Despite the narrow age gap and their friendship being completely platonic, Cake portrayed it as predatory by relying on heavily cropped and edited screenshots that omitted important context. Yao never suggested she was groomed or that there was anything romantic or sexual in their relationship, but rather expressed her frustration that people kept clocking her as a minor because she was accessing adult spaces by pretending to be older. After Cake published these Google Docs, Yao claimed the victim deserved to be smeared and doxed for "exposing" their personal information, but not for allegedly grooming them. Interesting to note.

Yao's claim that their personal information was exposed refers to a different victim pointing out Yao's age using information that was already publicly available, including their WeChat ID, Twitter handle, and Strawpage, all of which listed their name and full birthday. According to this victim, this information was cited solely to establish that Yao was a minor.

Yao lists, "Say, [Victim's name], I hear you like 'em young," as their display name on both Twitter and Bluesky. The display name jokes about a topic that Yao has publicly described as a serious personal experience, which I found difficult to reconcile.

The other "minor victim" was the victim's ex. She was 17, and the victim was 18 when they started dating. To claim a 1 to 2-year age-gap relationship is predatory is false and ludicrous. According to the victim, they met due to their shared interest in Solar Opposites on Instagram and were later introduced to their friend Yao a couple of months later.

Proof is provided below that the victim's ex was 17.

When I reached out to this other supposed minor victim, who Cake claimed was too traumatized to come forward, they switched from listing their former partner as a girlfriend when I asked if they knew this person by name to a groomer the moment, I stated I was investigating possible predatory allegations. This abuser failed to provide me with any evidence of this alleged predatory behavior. You can read about it here. (ctrl + click)

You can also read about how the same supposedly groomed minor was very abusive towards their ex, constantly flooding their inbox with hate messages while they were dating, creating many alternate social media accounts and emails months after the victim gained the courage to finally break up with her in her desperate attempt to get back with them, and fantasizing about them being brutally killed for breaking up with them here: (ctrl + click) I have listed this link multiple times throughout this callout and I highly suggest you read through the entire thread because it clears up so much confusion in Cake's Google Docs.

Additionally, nudes were never solicited as Cake claims, and no solid evidence was provided for her claims in any document. Despite the gravity of these allegations, Cake never reported them to law enforcement. It was not until four days after Cake published those Google Docs that an investigator, meaning someone else had filed a report, arrived at their doorstep. The case was dismissed the same day after they showed the detective evidence proving they had not preyed on these minors and heard the victim's side of the story. (See Testimony)

This leads us to one obvious question: if the victims did not do what Cake accused them of, why is she attacking them so relentlessly?

Based on the evidence presented throughout this document, I do not believe these actions were motivated by a genuine concern for protecting others, especially not minors. Cake has contributed relatively little to the Solar Opposites fandom in comparison to the amount of time she has spent targeting her victims. One possible explanation is that online callouts and public accusations provide a sense of purpose, validation, or moral superiority for her. Social media can make it easy for abusers to convince themselves that harassment is justified if they believe they are punishing people they have labeled as "stalkers."

From that perspective, each new accusation reinforces a narrative in which the targeted victims deserve whatever happens to them. Small disagreements become interpreted as further evidence of wrongdoing, and increasingly implausible conclusions can begin to feel reasonable to the person making them. If someone has already convinced themselves that another person is malicious, it becomes much easier to reinterpret ordinary interactions in the worst possible way.

This is, of course, my interpretation and should not be treated as an objective fact. No one has direct access to another person's thoughts or motivations, but we are free to speculate. Regardless of why Cake behaved this way, the documented actions speak for themselves. Readers should evaluate her conduct based on the evidence presented in this document rather than on any speculation about her motives.

Summary

None of these criticisms from Cake or her Lol account, up until she published her Google Doc, were predatory accusations. I believe the vast majority of people would agree that an accusation of child predation is substantially more serious than an accusation of harassment. This begs the question: if Cake genuinely believed these predatory allegations she was spreading, why were they not mentioned until the publication of her Google Docs? This was because Cake wanted revenge on who she believed was running Terrence's account for outing her and Shroomers as predators and the victim had reached past their teen years between this incident and the publication of her Google Docs, which gave Cake leverage in defaming them and others she believed to be predators, especially since messages had missing timestamps and Cake was vague about each of the three people's exact age.

Additional

Here, Cake admits that she takes sadistic pleasure in watching her victim have panic attacks and cry. The harassment claims were anonymous messages Cake received, which she believed the victim sent. Those messages were lists of several personality disorders and their definitions. By contrast, Cake repeatedly deadnamed and misgendered the victim, accused them of predatory behavior at just 18-years-old towards people only slightly younger than them, mocked their escape from CSA, and engaged in months of persistent online harassment, libel, and stalking. The conduct documented throughout these posts is not comparable in severity to those anonymous messages.

Cake also claims not to care, yet she typed up several essays about a situation that easily could have been ignored. Ironically, I cannot complain too much about the mention of my Tumblr blog because, after she posted that thread, I began receiving anonymous messages from more of her victims. It is also difficult to reconcile Cake's expectation that she should publicly defame and criticize others without eventually being the subject of criticism herself. The thread she posted mostly serves as her personal ego boost, citing her intelligence as superior. Yet even after the Lol account was linked to her, she has not acknowledged responsibility for the conduct documented here.

Conclusion

The lesson I hope readers take away from this is that sustained harassment often has little to do with uncovering the truth. Instead, it can become an exercise in scrutinizing every aspect of a person's life in search of something that can be weaponized against them. Throughout these posts, I have shown repeated examples of Cake focusing on minor and innocuous actions while making serious accusations without adequate support. Whatever the underlying motivation may be, the result was a prolonged pattern of harassment directed at multiple people.

I suspect she is currently working on another Google Doc to further harass her victims because I have been publicly calling out her behavior since September. She had mentioned earlier she would ignore my blog because she was focused on school, and now she is on summer break and is hardly active on Twitter (X), so be prepared!

Cake's defamatory callouts have brought her victims much distress that still affects them to this day. Ironically, those same defamatory callouts ultimately helped expose her own conduct on her Lol account by revealing information only she would know.

As of writing this, I feel like I have discussed everything that needed to be addressed regarding Cake's Lol account and her abuse. Provided there is no further escalation or retaliation from Cake, I do not intend to escalate these matters further because they happened quite a while ago. Any attempt to interfere, intimidate, or retaliate will only result in further documentation and disclosure.

Pt. 2

Due to Tumblr's 30-image limit per post, this exposé has been divided into 3 parts. Click here for Part 1 and Part 3.

Less than two hours after Cake responded to Terrence's post with dox information, the same victim Cake doxed received a No Caller ID twice to get Terrence's attention. If this Lol account was run by a "random vigilante" as Cake previously suggested, then there would be little use in masking the phone number.

Below are messages sent between the victim (yellow) and me (purple) on Discord.

Had she called them without masking her phone number and the victim inquired about this number, she would have instantly been exposed as Cake because she regularly uses her number to chat with her closest online friends, Cassie (Bogdreamz/s) and Devin (Dollopadingus).

See alt text for context

Cake is not a pro-shipper or NSFW artist and has not been harassed to the same extent as her victims online. The reason she refuses to reveal her identity online, even to her closest friends, with whom she has traveled to San Diego Comic-Con and shared hotels with multiple times, is that she is actively harming people and would risk facing legal charges for libel, harassment, and doxing.

Even if you still are not convinced this Lol account was run by Cake, you have to at least acknowledge that this rumor was started by her. If not her, then someone within her friend group was running this account, so she must be held accountable to some degree. Since Cake seems to have innate insight into every anonymous person she comes across online (if we are assuming this account was not run by her) then she should know who this user is and would have called them out a long time ago. The fact that she has yet to call out the Lol account on her Twitter (X) means she is complicit in their harassment of a victim of CSA. Despite Terrence's trolling, nothing he did permitted this harassment and doxxing, especially towards uninvolved victims.

Cake has merely dismissed this blog by claiming I’m sending anonymous messages to myself. Besides the redundant false predator accusations, this was the only way she could convince her followers to ignore this blog and send anonymous harassment to me. (See more.) Enabling anonymous messages just to receive harassment, hate, dox information, and having to investigate and call them out for months would not be worth the trouble without the anonymous testimonies and additional information regarding Cake that I have received. Addressing any topic does not require sending anonymous messages to myself either.

Summary of The Events Described Below

The rumor of Terrence being the victim targeted (besides the Lol account) had not spread to social media publicly until Cake published her threads and Google Docs on July 12, 2025. Before the Google Docs were published, this rumor spread only in the Solar Opposites Creativity Discord server back in March, meaning that if not for Cake, then definitely someone in this server ran the Lol account. Cake revealed in her Google Doc that in March of 2025, she reached out to Cassie "Bo" (bogdreamz) and Shroomers (lunarboofshroom), telling them to block this victim on Instagram without providing a reason. Despite her telling her friends to block this user, Cake blocked them only on her saveoursolars Instagram account while keeping them unblocked on her main amorvavi account to continue stalking the victim. Cake also kept the victim in their Discord server weeks after telling her friends to block them, waiting for the perfect moment to lash out at them and create more drama.

The discussion of Shroomers's mental health was brought up, and the victim pitched in that perhaps Shroomers blocking them had something to do with it. Cake decided to lash out at them, falsely accusing them of harassing Shroomers so that no one would bother to defend them or confirm these allegations. The victim left the Discord server, and Cake quickly took screenshots of their Bluesky posts while they were having a panic attack, which she caused, to later use against them in her Google Doc. Cake took screenshots of everyone they blocked on ClearSky in mere minutes, too, claiming who they blocked was strange because they “had nothing to do with it,” pretending saveoursolars was not her alternate account and that they forgot Shroomers and Cassie blocked them on Instagram.

Notes: Everything redacted in black was Cake's doing; everything redacted in gray is mine. Redacted in black is Cassie. Screenshots below were obtained from Cake's Google Docs.

Cake and Cassie (Bogdreams(z) or Wetlittlebeast on Twitter (X)) got concerned when Terrence tweeted what has been a very common slang in internet culture since 2011 & 2021 (see Oomf | Know Your Meme and A Real Man Never Speaks Ill of X). Although the only similarity between Cassie's Instagram story and Terrence's tweet was the "oomf" part, Cake insisted that he, who she also believed to be the same unassociated victim, was directly copying Cassie's story and begged him to block their Instagram.

Cake completely dismisses the other user who liked Cassie's story because she was already targeting this victim.

Cake states her condolences to Cassie and her hatred towards her victim simply for liking some of his stories.

Note that "they like every one of my stories" is an exaggeration. In this screenshot, one story was liked, and the other was not. Regardless, liking Instagram stories is never a call for harassment, nor does it mean they were bothering Cassie.

Without reaching out to the victim, both convinced themselves that the victim was maliciously liking Bogdream's stories rather than admiring his humor and artwork. I am confused as to how one could believe someone is maliciously liking Instagram stories, but regardless, this is what these two had deluded themselves into.

I spoke with the victim about the situation with Shroomers. According to their testimony and screenshots provided from Cake's Google Docs, people in the Solar Opposites Creativity Discord (a strictly anti-ship) server were discussing Shroomers's mental health.

Concerned for Shroomer's mental health, Cake's victim pitched in that they were blocked, wondering if it was a related issue. Nobody responded for hours, despite texts being quickly exchanged between other members of this server.

Three hours later, Cake demands that they abandon the server and immediately begins smearing them as "an evil human being" and spreading lies of harassment towards Shroomers to ensure no one defends them from her abuse. Although Cake had been telling her friends to block them for two weeks before this event, she had no issue with them remaining in the Discord server from November 2024 to April of 2025, when they expressed concern for Shroomers's mental health. Cake was actively waiting for the perfect opportunity for drama to occur in the server instead of getting the Discord moderator to kick them out, so she could further harass the victim.

Victim informed me the redacted user below is Popteamdoki.

Redacted in gray is a friend of the victim, one of the many people Cake was convinced is the same person as the victim she targeted.

Cake scorns her victim for having the "audacity" to be concerned for Shroomers's mental health. Cake did not bother to discuss anything with respect and is quick to claim her victim is having a panic attack not because of her bullying, but because their identity has apparently been revealed, not as Terrence, but as a harmless friend of theirs, a pro-shipper, I might add, because that matters in assessing the moral worth of a human being for Cake, a strict anti-shipper.

Cake always assumes the worst about her victims and critiques literally every little thing they do, like criticizing her victim for updating their profile picture and removing their name from their Bluesky profile after Cake spiraled them into a panic attack in the Discord server. Instead of taking pity, she decided to use their every little action against them.

After Cake spirals her victim into a panic attack, she frantically refreshes their Bluesky and Clearsky, taking screenshots of all their posts which they later deleted to mock them for having a panic attack due to her bullying while simultaneously pretending they are faking it to guilt-trip her.

The comment next to the arrow is Cake's ignorant comment. This screenshot was obtained from her Google Document.

Although the victim blocked both Cake's known accounts on Bluesky (amorvavi and saveoursolars), she created a third account to stalk them, which is how she obtained these screenshots.

The victim also reached out to Camlugo, a user who invited them to join their Discord server and immediately sided with Cake without bothering to hear their side.

Camlugo crops their screenshot to avoid showing the message they sent. Below was the rest of the message the victim received who tried to explain themself but was abruptly blocked.

Again, the victim is redacted in yellow, and I'm redacted in purple.

In a panic, the victim concluded Shroomers started these rumors about them since they had not been blocked by Cake yet. With no other means to contact them and warn others, they edit their Etsy review for an item they bought from Shroomers. Furious, Shroomers immediately responded. Over two hundred text messages were exchanged, in which Shroomers is highly dismissive and rude, even when the victim brings up that Cake's bullying caused them to have panic attacks. I suggest reading through this short three post Bluesky thread for more context. (Click here)

Pt. 1

Due to Tumblr's 30-image limit per post, this exposé has been divided into three parts. Click here for Part 2 and Part 3.

Please Read: I do not condone or support harassment towards anyone, and I strongly advise you to be vigilant and block this individual at your leisure. This post is meant to clarify past events and give the victims of this abuse a voice without creating further conflict. Stay safe!

Handles are in parentheses.

I did not want to have to make this callout post, especially since the account mainly being discussed here was created over a year ago. However, Cake's harassment towards Terrence using an alternate account, the doxxing of an innocent person and their family after falsely believing they were targeting him, the mocking of a victim's escape from CSA at 11 years old, doxxing, and ableist and transphobic remarks are issues that I strongly believe need to be addressed.

My original callout post was short because I was working off of the few screenshots that were given to me. After obtaining substantially more evidence through Archive, however, I realized the original exposé did not fully capture the extent of Cake's abuse.

Note: When I posted the original exposé, I was unaware that Archive captures Twitter (X) posts almost immediately, so I did not bother to check. I believed these screenshots were all the information I was going to receive about this account unless someone else reached out with additional information. Additionally, I contacted Archive to have these saved webpages removed and waited for their confirmation. I would not have made this callout knowing anyone could search for these posts, which would have rendered my redactions ineffective and possibly inadvertently exposed these victims to further harm.

Embedded below are screenshots and the link of the original Lol account exposé.

A screenshot of the same post from Archive is provided below, proving this is the same account and showing how Twitter (X) posts appear in Archive's format.

Cake replied to Terrence's post, where he addressed her and (lunarboofshroom) Shroomers's "Groomer's" predatory behavior towards minors, the latter of whom was his main focus and who he had been calling out from January to May of 2025. Terrence rarely called out Cake, and Shroomers never made an alternate account to harass Terrence. In retaliation to being outed as a predator, Cake replied to this post specifically with dox information.

Cake deadnames the victim and uses the outdated Asperger's diagnosis that was subsumed under Autism with the release of the DSM-5 in 2013. This term has become controversial because its namesake, Hans Asperger, cooperated with the Nazi regime and Aktion T4, a system that contributed to the "euthanasia" programs, medical experimentation, and institutionalization of differently abled children during World War II.

Terrence confirms that Cake used the victim's yearbook photo from when they were 11 years old as her profile pic. The victim's age was listed in Cake's reply to Terrence's post in the blurred-out image we saw earlier.

Although Terrence was not directly doxed, his county coincidentally lined up with where the victim once resided years ago. Cake used the city which Mel (potionpoof) doxed to her, and assumed Terrence must have been the same person because the city in Joe's (a friend of Terrence) post matched up with the victim's county. Cake never considered that millions of people live in this county like Cassie (Bogdreamz), who could have been the targeted victim here had she not been her closest online friend. More information about this ordeal can be viewed by clicking on this embedded link.

Rather than engaging with Terrence's clarification, Cake responded within a minute by posting another false accusation about the victim and revealing both their deadname and current name, further mocking and harassing them. Throughout this exposé, this pattern of dismissiveness and deflection will occur repeatedly whenever Cake is confronted about her bad behavior.

Terrence immediately clocked the Lol account as Cake's. Rather than directly denying the accusation, Cake responds by redirecting suspicion about the account's identity, suggesting a former friend, a random "vigilante," or even the victim's own mother would dox and harass the victim.

Above, Cake claims she is the victim's mother, providing both her legal name and nickname.

Further proof is provided below of Cake doxing the victim and their family by researching them extensively, going so far as to save photos posted to their mother's Facebook and use one as her new profile picture.

Note: Please see alt text for further context.

Cake attempts to bargain with Terrence into unblocking her, so she can continue to directly harass him, by insinuating that if he refuses, then he must be the victim she is targeting. Cake uses both the victim's current and deadname to dox them here again.

Cake then doxes and reduces the victim to a 'self-hating autistic/trans person' as an argument. If her criticism of Terrence and the victim depends on mocking or speculating about differently abled or transgender people, then her criticism is completely invalid. Transgender and autistic people have the right to disclose their identities at their leisure, and weaponizing their choice to stay stealth is ableist and transphobic. Furthermore, Cake speculating about Terrence's identity and pretending he has mocked transgender and autistic individuals, even if he did, is still ableist and transphobic. She should have addressed Terrence's actions instead of attacking marginalized identities.

Cake reposts two memes relating to the drama she initiated, which is consistent with her Twitter use on main.

Cake focuses on the victim's "friends," who are her main targets. Though this victim is one of Cake's main four targets, Ashrahn/EnigmaticPenchant and Fellofreak/Pankiimz/Spiffyspunk are bigger targets for her. She began creating this Google Doc only 2 weeks after she made the Lol account, in which she quite literally predicted she would create a Google Doc to further harass all of them.

Cake claims that Terrence's panicking over her doxxing his county proves he is the victim she is targeting.

Cake claims that panic attacks are cute on her Lol account, and she later admitted on Twitter that watching her victim have panic attacks because of her abuse pleases her. More can be read about Cake taking pleasure in her victim's panic attacks in Part 2 & Part 3.

See alt text below.

For context, the "horseshit" below refers to Terrence outing Shroomers and Cake as predators for discussing the adult show Solar Opposites with minors, as we saw in the first screenshot in this callout.

Cake calling who she believed was her victim a "fragile" and a "thin-skinned idiot" for what she believed was her victim having a panic attack over Cake doxing them and mocking their escape from CSA is seriously fucked up. I should not even have to explain this one.

Bullying, harassing, deadnaming, doxxing, using outdated diagnostic terms, and mocking a victim's escape from CSA is 100x worse than calling Shroomers and Cake out for friending minors and talking to them about an adult show, even if these allegations were not true.

Cake doxes the victim's last name.

Notice where she says, "be sure to stay silent when I insult you," to who she believed to be the victim and their "friends." This was further anticipation of the Google Docs she began creating only two weeks after posting this.

The reason Cake believed the person redacted in blue above would "spiral" was because she had doxed them on her Lol account several times and believed Terrence's account to be run by them.

Although it's difficult to tell what these four images were, it is clear that Cake is mocking the victim's weight and appearance.

This was Cake's last post on her Lol account before she went private. According to a witness statement, she waited a month before deleting her account to ensure Terrence's account was permanently deleted after Twitter's (X's) 30-day account restoration policy.

Despite the victim continuing to do nothing to Cake, only two weeks later, Cake decided she would make Google Docs to dox and defame them as a "predator" and harass several other victims.

A few months after Cake published those Google Docs, she had the audacity to claim that the pseudonym she used as "fake breadcrumb" in her Google Doc was an "attempt to dox" her. She further defamed her victims by falsely insinuating they retaliated against her abuse because they are racist.

Cake also alleged that her victims had created "racial caricatures to mock" her. However, in the materials discussed here, I did not find any examples of such artwork being presented to support that claim.

Cake has also described her victims' monitoring of her public posts as "stalking." Her posts in question are publicly accessible. The same materials also show that Cake archived and referenced numerous posts from her critics, with many screenshots appearing to have been captured within mere minutes to mere hours after the posts were published.