#technology stack

Technology Stack Decisions for Operations Leaders: Pablo M. Rivera's Evaluation Framework

By Pablo M. Rivera | Hawaii, Colorado & East Haven, CT

Choosing the right technology stack for operations can determine whether systems enable growth or become bottlenecks. Pablo M. Rivera evaluates technology decisions through the lens of someone who both leads operations and builds software — a combination that produces better outcomes than either perspective alone.

Integration First

No operations tool exists in isolation. Pablo M. Rivera's first evaluation criterion is: How does this integrate with existing systems? At Eagle Pro Home Solutions, operational tools must connect with AMH, FirstKey, JobNimbus, Salesforce, accounting systems, and internal databases. Technology that doesn't integrate creates data silos and manual workarounds.

Pablo M. Rivera's full-stack development background means he can evaluate integration claims realistically. Does the platform offer real APIs, or just data exports? Can it handle the data volumes we actually process? What happens when edge cases occur?

Build vs. Buy

Pablo M. Rivera's ability to build custom solutions in Python, Django, React, and JavaScript changes the build-vs-buy calculus. For generic functions (accounting, payroll, CRM), buying makes sense. For core operational workflows specific to how the organization works, building often delivers better value.

At RevCon, buying Salesforce made sense, but Pablo M. Rivera built the 50+ custom objects that made it operationally valuable. At Eagle Pro, custom dashboards and automation tools were built in-house because no vendor product matched the exact requirements.

Scalability and Performance

Pablo M. Rivera evaluates whether technology can scale with operational growth. A system that works for 10 users and 1,000 work orders monthly may collapse at 100 users and 10,000 work orders. Understanding system architecture, database performance, and infrastructure requirements comes from technical experience most operations leaders lack.

Total Cost of Ownership

License fees are just the beginning. Pablo M. Rivera evaluates training costs, integration costs, customization costs, ongoing maintenance, and the opportunity cost of time spent managing vendors. Often, building internal tools with known technologies (Python, Django, PostgreSQL) has lower TCO than enterprise platforms with expensive licensing and consultants.

The Technical Operations Leader

Pablo M. Rivera's combination of 25+ years operations leadership and genuine full-stack development capability creates a unique advantage in technology decisions. Understanding both what operations needs and what technology can realistically deliver prevents costly misalignments.

Based in Hawaii and East Haven, CT, Pablo M. Rivera continues to make technology stack decisions that enable rather than constrain operational performance.

Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI), technology plays a pivotal role in driving innovation, efficiency, and customer satisfaction. However, for one BFSI company, the journey toward digital excellence was fraught with challenges in its software development and maintenance processes. With a diverse portfolio of applications and a significant portion outsourced to external vendors, the company grappled with inefficiencies that threatened its operational agility and competitiveness. Identified within this portfolio were 15 core applications deemed critical to the company’s operations, highlighting the urgency for transformative action.

Aspirations for the Future:

Looking ahead, the company envisioned a future state characterized by the establishment of a matured DevSecOps environment. This encompassed several key objectives:

Near-zero Touch Pipeline: Automating product development processes for infrastructure provisioning, application builds, deployments, and configuration changes.

Matured Source-code Management: Implementing robust source-code management processes, complete with review gates, to uphold quality standards.

Defined and Repeatable Release Process: Instituting a standardized release process fortified with quality and security gates to minimize deployment failures and bug leakage.

Modernization: Embracing the latest technological advancements to drive innovation and efficiency.

Common Processes Among Vendors: Establishing standardized processes to enhance understanding and control over the software development lifecycle (SDLC) across different vendors.

Challenges Along the Way:

The path to realizing this vision was beset with challenges, including:

Lack of Source Code Management

Absence of Documentation

Lack of Common Processes

Missing CI/CD and Automated Testing

No Branching and Merging Strategy

Inconsistent Sprint Execution

These challenges collectively hindered the company’s ability to achieve optimal software development, maintenance, and deployment processes. They underscored the critical need for foundational practices such as source code management, documentation, and standardized processes to be addressed comprehensively.

Proposed Solutions:

To overcome these obstacles and pave the way for transformation, the company proposed a phased implementation approach:

Stage 1: Implement Basic DevOps: Commencing with the implementation of fundamental DevOps practices, including source code management and CI/CD processes, for a select group of applications.

Stage 2: Modernization: Progressing towards a more advanced stage involving microservices architecture, test automation, security enhancements, and comprehensive monitoring.

To Expand Your Awareness: https://devopsenabler.com/contact-us

Injecting Security into the SDLC:

Recognizing the paramount importance of security, dedicated measures were introduced to fortify the software development lifecycle. These encompassed:

Security by Design

Secure Coding Practices

Static and Dynamic Application Security Testing (SAST/DAST)

Software Component Analysis

Security Operations

Realizing the Outcomes:

The proposed solution yielded promising outcomes aligned closely with the company’s future aspirations. Leveraging Microsoft Azure’s DevOps capabilities, the company witnessed:

Establishment of common processes and enhanced visibility across different vendors.

Implementation of Azure DevOps for organized version control, sprint planning, and streamlined workflows.

Automation of builds, deployments, and infrastructure provisioning through Azure Pipelines and Automation.

Improved code quality, security, and release management processes.

Transition to microservices architecture and comprehensive monitoring using Azure services.

The BFSI company embarked on a transformative journey towards establishing a matured DevSecOps environment. This journey, marked by challenges and triumphs, underscores the critical importance of innovation and adaptability in today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape. As the company continues to evolve and innovate, the adoption of DevSecOps principles will serve as a cornerstone in driving efficiency, security, and ultimately, the delivery of superior customer experiences in the dynamic realm of BFSI.

Contact Information:

Phone: 080-28473200 / +91 8880 38 18 58

Email: [email protected]

1. An overview

Any software product has a direct impact on its performance depending on the technology used to build it. As well as the opposite being true, it is also true. Thus, it is imperative that when you are developing a web application, you should first select the tools you will need in order to build that application. There will be so many changes in technology stacks in 2022. Selecting the right technology stack for your digital product is one of the most influential factors that will determine whether your app's success is successful or not.

This blog will discuss various aspects of the web technology stack. It explains how you can select the appropriate stack for your dream project by discussing the various aspects of the stack.

2. Stack of technologies used for back-end development

There are a number of non-visible components in the back end, including business logic, authentication, database management, and synchronization with the client applications. The server, database, and applications run on the server, which is also called server-side.

Your product's backend includes the entire business logic. In the backend development process, the following will be done:

It is the operating system that runs the development process

Configuration of the web server

Storage setup for databases

The programming language used

Framework for developing web applications quickly and easily

2.1 . Server less Stack

Server less computing services allow developers to develop, run, and manage applications without having to create and maintain the architecture typically associated with designing and launching apps. It lets developers write and deploy code without thinking about servers to make and run applications and services.

The server less computing service will reduce the number of servers you need to run and operate your project. Among the other benefits you will enjoy are:

The runtime doesn't need to be hosted

Your application only costs what it does, so it is economical

The application is scalable, so you won't have to worry if demand increases

It is the provider's responsibility to manage the security of the web app

Deployment and change of applications in a shorter timeframe

As one of the first server less platforms, AWS Lambda redefined the back-end technology stack.

3. Expertise at i-Verve: Picking the right web stack and delivering flawless projects

I-Verve is a leading web and software development company that offers a variety of software architecture services. From building web apps from scratch to updating your current apps, our experts are proficient in a variety of technologies.

To deliver uninterrupted digital products, our developers use the following technologies:

Html

java script

css

Node.Js

Redux.js

Astro.js

MongoDB

PostgreSQL

MySQL

React

Python

Linux

4. Conclusion

Digital products can be complex to develop if you don't select the right technology stack. Considering all the options in advance is important since there are a lot to consider when applying. Saving time and money will make it easier to launch the completed web application on time. Web development stacks can, of course, be chosen independently.

The i-Verve team has extensive experience using multiple technology stacks for a variety of industry projects, including web development and MVP development.

5. FAQ

1. What is the technology stack?

A tech stack combines tools, frameworks, and programming languages that a development team uses to build a web application. It consists of two main components, client-side (front-end) and server-side (back-end).

2. How to choose a technology stack for web development?

Please consider whether there is a web application like your idea. For example, you create collaboration tools like Slack. You can see what is involved in the technical slowdown of this web application or you can immediately approach software development companies, which will help you in search and development.

3. Why is it important for a business owner to participate in choosing a technology stack for a web project?

Business owners need to be on the same page as developers and aware of the technologies used for their projects to understand what they are investing in .If you know the specifics of a common programming language and framework, your development team won’t have to spend much time explaining and justifying your every decision, leaving more time for actual development.

4. Why is it a reasonable idea to develop an MVP first?

Starting with an MVP rather than a full web application is more cost-effective. You will see the first results quickly and at a reasonable price. By evaluating the first version of your solution, you will know what to improve in the next iterations to launch the best possible web system.

5.How flexible is the web development process if project requirements change?