Solar power projects
HPERC’s clearance of a 1 MW rural-area PPA has reframed how Solar power projects should be interpreted in Himachal Pradesh. Although the commission has approved the agreement at Rs. 3.45 per kWh, it has categorised the tariff as provisional and explicitly subject to adjustment against any capital subsidy received or deemed to be received.
This places Solar power projects squarely inside a conditional revenue framework. HPERC has directed that if admissible subsidy is not applied for or availed within two years, it will be deemed as received, enabling HPSEBL to recover the corresponding benefit from future payments. The downside risk of administrative delay or ineligibility is being placed entirely on the developer.
The scheduled commercial operation date has been fixed at 30.04.2026, and the approved tariff is stated to apply until 31.03.2027. However, the order makes clear that this firmness exists only within the boundary of subsidy adjustment. Any subsidy support can still compress effective realisation even after commissioning.
Evacuation has been hardwired into the PPA through the existing 11 kV Cholthara–Tihra feeder and the associated 33/11 kV sub-station. There is no joint evacuation arrangement and no compensatory tariff mechanism for network-side risk.
The order is silent on the quantum or timing of any applicable subsidy. That omission matters because the magnitude of subsidy directly determines the scale of post-approval tariff clawback.
These features place DISCOMs Latest News and Power sector reforms at the centre of how small solar PPAs are now being underwritten.
EnergylineIndia.com documents how tariff approvals are becoming compliance tools, not revenue guarantees, Solar Power, HPERC, Tariff Risk, PPA, Renewables.
