For fanfiction readers, the holy grail of content is Archive of Our Own (AO3), a non-profit website that hosts fan-produced works for free. It’s an incredible site, built and run entirely by volunteers, that has one of the best (if not the best) tagging systems for literature currently available. Readers got used to being able to search for the content they liked best while having clear content warnings. It led to the question: why can’t published fiction be tagged like this?
That idea is what started TagCat, and we’re excited to be standing on the shoulders of giants, but we’ve also noticed some confusion about if we’re going to be an exact copy of AO3 or if our features will work exactly the same way. We’d like to talk today about some of the ways that we’re different from AO3.
Obviously, the first difference is the content that we’re tagging. AO3 is almost exclusively fan-generated content for existing intellectual properties (with some original work). TagCat will be for published fiction works (with plans to later branch out to non-fiction, poetry, visual media, and maybe more!). Because of this difference in content, we also tag characters and relationships differently. Character names are only helpful when you are already familiar with the characters, so we don’t name, but describe them. You won’t find Harry/Ginny tagged, but you may see Male/Female Romance and Dating a Friend’s Sister.
The next difference is that readers will tag the works, not the authors. Users will enter tags, set their relevance levels, spoileriness, and any modifiers. Users can then participate in the moderation process by disputing tags that don’t belong on the work or that are tagged inappropriately as spoilers (or the other way around). We’ve tossed around some ideas for official author-participation, but readers will always be the main generators of tags. If you’re an author who has ideas on how you’d like to participate in the site, send us a message or email.
AO3 has a great system for “wrangling” their tags since they allow free-form tags to be added to works. During this process, “wranglers” decide whether a tag becomes “canon,” and set implications and aliases so searching by different spellings or phrasings will show the same results. While we have a similar system of setting implications, TagCat is aiming for a more consistent and uniform set of tags without the free-style comment type tags common on AO3. Forcing all tags to go through a moderation process when they’re added means that we can set implications and that you won’t find both heterosexual relationship and straight romance on the same book since they would be “groomed” (our version of wrangling) to be the same tag.
The last difference we want to cover today is the number of tags. A story on AO3 is well-tagged if it has 30 tags, but we’ve been finding that well-tagged books on TagCat have 80+ tags. Many of the tags are frequently not needed on AO3 like character descriptions and setting tags, but they’re useful on books you’ve never read before. The number of tags also leads us to display them differently. Instead of seeing tags in the order they were added, tags are displayed in tag blocks and then sorted by type and relevance within those.
The volunteers behind TagCat are avid fans of AO3, and we’re excited to be bringing the tag concept to published works and putting our own twist on it. Let us know if you have any questions!