#tactics

the nervous system prioritises safety above all else...

so i decided to make it unsafe in a reality which i don't desire...

NEW AFFIRMATION UNLOCKED

'i can only breathe in a reality where i'm a master of the void state' / 'i can only breathe in a reality where i'm a master of shifting'

BOOM SAFETY TRICK + BOOM IDENTITY SHIFT

TACTICS ASFFFFF

I CRACKED IT

THE CODE THAT IS

Sure!

Here's a zine I like that gives a really good overview of chemical weapons and how to do an eye flush. (available in both English and Spanish, there's also versions for printing).

General tips:

Only use water for eye flushes--don't use milk, other chemicals, etc. Water bottles with a sports top/squeeze top are the best for doing eye flushes. If you don't have that kind of lid, you can stab a hole in a normal water bottle cap to basically turn it into a squeeze water bottle. Practice eye flushes at home so that you're not trying to figure it out for the first time in the middle of a chaotic protest situation.

Wear protective goggles. It's a lot easier to deal with tear gas and help other people if you don't get a direct hit to your eyes. Put them on before you see cops getting out riot gear--goggles do no good if they're in your backpack and not on you!

The number one tactic of the cops is fear. They use chemical weapons to try to break up crowds, intimidate us, and dissuade us from participating in (urgently needed) escalatory direct action. When we're tear gassed, it sucks, it's scary, and it hurts, and at the same time, it is temporary, and we can help each other get through it and care for each other in the aftermath.

in general, when looking for information about protest safety, I recommend looking up resources from street medic collectives. Riot Medicine, Crimethinc, and Sprout Distro's collection of Direct Action zines have some good information. Double check info before spreading posts on social media- myths like the "pour milk on your eyes" seem to regularly go viral, which is super unhelpful.

TODAY (July 14), I'm giving the closing keynote for the fifteenth HACKERS ON PLANET EARTH, in QUEENS, NY. Happy Bastille Day! NEXT SATURDAY (July 20), I'm appearing in CHICAGO at Exile in Bookville.

Like you, I have heard a lot about Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's roadmap for the actions that Trump should take if he wins the presidency. Given the Heritage Foundation's centrality to the American authoritarian project, it's about as awful and frightening as you might expect:

https://www.project2025.org/

But (nearly) all the reporting and commentary on Project 2025 badly misses the point. I've only read a single writer who immediately grasped the true significance of Project 2025: The American Prospect's Rick Perlstein, which is unsurprising, given Perlstein's stature as one of the left's most important historians of right wing movements:

https://prospect.org/politics/2024-07-10-project-2025-republican-presidencies-tradition/

As Perlstein points out, Project 2025 isn't new. The Heritage Foundation and its allies have prepared documents like this, with many identical policy prescriptions, in the run-up to many presidential elections. Perlstein argues that Warren G Harding's 1921 inaugural address captures much of its spirit, as did the Nixon campaign's 1973 vow to "move the country so far to the right 'you won’t even recognize it.'"

The threats to democracy and its institutions aren't new. The right has been bent on their destruction for more than a century. As Perlstein says, the point of taking note of this isn't to minimize the danger, rather, it's to contextualize it. The American right has, since the founding of the Republic, been bent on creating a system of hereditary aristocrats, who govern without "interference" from democratic institutions, so that their power to extract wealth from First Nations, working people, and the land itself is checked only by rivalries with other aristocrats. The project of the right is grounded in a belief in Providence: that God's favor shines on His best creations and elevates them to wealth and power. Elite status is proof of merit, and merit is "that which leads to elite status."

When a wealthy person founds an intergenerational dynasty of wealth and power, this is merely a hereditary meritocracy: a bloodline infused with God's favor. Sometimes, this belief is dressed up in caliper-wielding pseudoscience, with the "good bloodline" reflecting superior genetics and not the favor of the Almighty. Of course, a true American aristocrat gussies up his "race realism" with mystical nonsense: "God favored me with superior genes." The corollary, of course, is that you are poor because God doesn't favor you, or because your genes are bad, or because God punished you with bad genes.

So we should be alarmed by the right's agenda. We should be alarmed at how much ground it has gained, and how the right has stolen elections and Supreme Court seats to enshrine antimajoritarianism as a seemingly permanent fact of life, giving extremist minorities the power to impose their will on the rest of us, dooming us to a roasting planet, forced births, racist immiseration, and most expensive, worst-performing health industry in the world.

But for all that the right has bombed so many of the roads to a prosperous, humane future, it's a huge mistake to think of the right as a stable, unified force, marching to victory after inevitable victory. The American right is a brittle coalition led by a handful of plutocrats who have convinced a large number of turkeys to vote for Christmas.

The right wing coalition needs to pander to forced-birth extremists, racist extremist, Christian Dominionist extremists (of several types), frothing anti-Communist cranks, vicious homophobes and transphobes, etc, etc. Pandering to all these groups isn't easy: for one thing, they often want opposite things – the post-Roe forced birth policies that followed the Dobbs decision are wildly unpopular among conservatives, with the exception of a clutch of totally unhinged maniacs that the party relies on as part of a much larger coalition. Even more unpopular are policies banning birth control, like the ones laid out in Project 2025. Less popular still: the proposed ban on no-fault divorce. Each of these policies have different constituencies to whom they are very popular, but when you put them together, you get Dan Savage's "Husbands you can't leave, pregnancies you can't prevent or terminate, politicians you can't vote out of office":

https://twitter.com/fakedansavage/status/1805680183065854083

The constituency for "husbands you can't leave, pregnancies you can't prevent or terminate, politicians you can't vote out of office" is very small. Almost no one in the GOP coalition is voting for all of this, they're voting for one or two of these things and holding their noses when it comes to the rest.

Take the "libertarian" wing of the GOP: its members do favor personal liberty…it's just that they favor low taxes for them more than personal liberty for you. The kind of lunatic who'd vote for a dead gopher if it would knock a quarter off his tax bill will happily allow his coalition partners to rape pregnant women with unnecessary transvaginal ultrasounds and force them to carry unwanted fetuses to term if that's the price he has to pay to save a nickel in taxes:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/29/jubilance/#tolerable-racism

And, of course, the religious maniacs who profess a total commitment to Biblical virtue but worship Trump, Gaetz, Limbaugh, Gingrich, Reagan, and the whole panoply of cheating, lying, kid-fiddling, dope-addled refugees from a Jack Chick tract know that these men never gave a shit about Jesus, the Apostles or the Ten Commandments – but they'll vote for 'em because it will get them school prayer, total abortion bans, and unregulated "home schooling" so they can brainwash a generation of Biblical literalists who think the Earth is 5,000 years old and that Jesus was white and super into rich people.

Time and again, the leaders of the conservative movement prove themselves capable of acts of breathtaking cruelty, and undoubtedly many of them are depraved sadists who genuinely enjoy the suffering of their enemies (think of Trump lickspittle Steven Miller's undisguised glee at the thought of parents who would never be reunited with children after being separated at the border). But it's a mistake to think that "the cruelty is the point." The point of the cruelty is to assemble and maintain the coalition. Cruelty is the tactic. Power is the point:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/03/09/turkeys-voting-for-christmas/#culture-wars

The right has assembled a lot of power. They did so by maintaining unity among people who have irreconcilable ethics and goals. Think of the pro-genocide coalition that includes far-right Jewish ethno-nationalists, antisemitic apocalyptic Christians who believe they are hastening the end-times, and Islamophobes of every description, from War On Terror relics to Hindu nationalists.

This is quite an improbable coalition, and while I deplore its goals, I can't help but be impressed by its cohesion. Can you imagine the kind of behind-the-scenes work it takes to get antisemites who think Jews secretly control the world to lobby with Zionists? Or to get Zionists to work alongside of Holocaust-denying pencilneck Hitler wannabes whose biggest regret is not bringing their armbands to Charlottesville?

So I fought the single rapier world number 112 at a tournament a few weeks ago, and other than being a lovely human being who beat me thoroughly like 11-5, I did get this nice attack which I feel warrants some more analysis.

I was essentially trying to recreate a method of attack that I've seen some Olympic epee fencers do a few times, wherein they quickly duck beneath their opponent's point to score. Like so:

The problem is though, this is often contingent on your opponent going for an attack of their own - and my opponent unfortunately does not take the bait. Rather, he retreats and moves out of distance, preventing me from scoring in the traditional epeeist way.

However! While the original plan failed, it did present an opportunity for a fun play. As I crouched suddenly and agressively while moving forward, my opponent, having some self preservation, retreats a little. While he does this, he drops his guard slightly, moving from seconde (defending the outside line with wrist pronated) to quarte (defending the inside line, wrist supinated) This, naturally, exposes his outside line.

In that moment, I was able to extend my point, pronate my wrist, and launch a fleche (an attack where the back leg passes over the front, creating an explosive running attack) which lands cleanly onto his chest/shoulder area.

The benefit of pronating my wrist is it creates opposition. While Olympic epee is governed by electric score boxes which have built in delays to officiate afterblows (In epee, once a light goes off, the other fencer has only 40 milliseconds to land their afterblow), HEMA is a lot more based on the judges discretion. Thus, it is much more important to make it clear that any afterblow is parried or significantly out of time.

By pronating my wrist, and placing my blade on my outside line so that my long edge faces his blade, I was able to both attack and move his blade clear as I did. In doing so, I pretty much pre-parry any counter he has at his disposal. While his blade does get out at the end and potentially clip my leg a teeny bit, this is easily over an acceptable tempo where an afterblow can be given, and therefore, the three points for a thrust to a chest was awarded to me!

To be honest though, a lot of this analysis is fun to do after the fact, but my body moved before my brain could process what it was seeing properly, so I'm thanking the training and muscle memory for this.