#sumudflotilla

Google kassiert für Fake News

Gefälschter Content als Suchergebnisse präsentiert

Als Opfer tagtäglicher Werbung wissen wir natürlich, dass deren Inhalte nicht viel mit Wahrheit zu tun haben. Aber auch Werbung sollte nicht wissentlich Unwahrheiten und erst Recht keine politische Hetze verbreiten dürfen. Auf CommonDreams.org lesen wir jedoch nun:

Am Wochenende im Internet veröffentlichte Beweise scheinen zu zeigen, dass der Technologieriese Google der israelischen Regierung erlaubt hat, gesponserte Content-Spots zu kaufen, damit Online-Nutzern, die nach der Global Sumud Flotilla suchen, unrichtige, propagandistische Inhalte angezeigt werden, in denen die Teilnehmer der Flottille beschuldigt werden, mit gewalttätigen, terroristischen Elementen verbündet zu sein.

Die Sumud-Flottille – eine Gruppe internationaler humanitärer Helfer und Friedensaktivisten, die mit über 40 Schiffen ihrer Flotte auf die Küste Gazas zusteuert, um die unrechtmäßige Blockade lebensrettender Hilfsgüter zu durchbrechen, die von Israel und seinen Verbündeten inmitten eines andauernden Völkermords verhängt wurde – hat keine dokumentierten Verbindungen zu terroristischen Organisationen und hat wiederholt klargestellt, dass es sich um eine völlig gewaltfreie Initiative unabhängiger Gruppen und Einzelpersonen handelt, die ein Ende von Leiden, Hungersnot und Tod in dem belagerten palästinensischen Gebiet sehen wollen.

Yanis Varoufakis, ehemaliger Finanzminister Griechenlands und Mitbegründer von Progressive International, veröffentlichte am selben Tag einen ähnlichen Screenshot und beschrieb den koordinierten Anzeigenkauf als Teil einer eskalierenden "Verleumdungskampagne gegen die Flottille" durch die israelische Regierung.

"Zuerst nannten sie sie die Hamas-Flottille und wandten dabei die übliche Taktik an, jedem, den sie ermorden, verstümmeln oder verkrüppeln wollen, das Hamas-Logo aufzudrücken", sagte Varoufakis.

"Jetzt sorgen sie mit der vollen Unterstützung von Google dafür, dass die obersten Suchergebnisse – die jeder erhält, der nach 'Global Sumud Flotilla' googelt – die mutigen Frauen und Männer, die nach Gaza segeln, um die Blockade und den Völkermord an 2 Millionen Menschen zu beenden, diese als 'Terroristen' brandmarken." ... Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely. (www.commondreams.org)

Mehr dazu bei https://www.commondreams.org/news/pure-incitement-google-allows-israeli-sponsored-propaganda-aimed-at-global-sumud-flotilla

In the early hours of October 1, Israeli naval forces intercepted vessels from the Global Sumud Flotilla some 70 nautical miles off Gaza’s coast. The flotilla, carrying humanitarian supplies and international activists, including Greta Thunberg, sought to breach Israel’s long-standing maritime blockade of Gaza. Organisers reported that at least 13 boats were boarded, communications were jammed, and activists arrested, but many vessels continued sailing toward the besieged enclave.

What We Know So Far

The Global Sumud Flotilla is a civil society initiative launched in 2025 with the goal of breaking Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza by sea. It comprises more than 40 vessels and some 500 participants from over 44 countries.

According to flotilla organisers, Israeli naval units intercepted several of their ships roughly 130 km off Gaza’s coast, boarding them and crippling communications systems. At least 13 vessels were reportedly intercepted.

Activists say the boarding was nonviolent but aggressive: cameras were disabled, live feeds cut, and protesters claim their vessels were forced into Israeli ports.

Israel maintains that the flotilla was entering a “lawful blockade zone” and contends that its actions were justified under security protocols. Israeli officials have labeled the mission more provocation than genuine humanitarian effort.

Some boats remain en route. Organisers say roughly 30 vessels are still sailing toward Gaza, about 85 km (46 nautical miles) away.

Countries around the world have reacted. Turkey called the interception an act of “terror.” Colombia announced the expulsion of Israeli diplomats after two Colombians were detained. Malaysia and other nations have denounced the boarding. Protests have erupted in cities including Rome, Buenos Aires, and Istanbul.

This is one of the largest sea protests against the Gaza blockade since the notorious 2010 flotilla raid, which resulted in the deaths of nine activists.

The Legal and Moral Tensions

Intercepting vessels in international waters raises serious questions under international law, especially the rules regarding blockades, freedom of navigation, and humanitarian access. Some legal experts and activists argue that Israel’s actions may constitute violations of international norms.

Israel, for its part, has justified the interception under the framework of a declared naval blockade of Gaza, citing security threats and the risk of the flotilla being used to smuggle arms. Critics counter that the blockade itself and the interception may constitute collective punishment against Gaza’s civilian population.

The flotilla organisers maintain that the mission is purely humanitarian, aimed at delivering medicine, food, and raising global awareness of Gaza’s humanitarian crisis.

High-Stakes Diplomacy & Global Pressure

The interception has already triggered diplomatic ripples. Italy and Spain have deployed naval vessels to monitor or support the flotilla in international waters.

Political leaders from multiple nations have demanded clarifications. Protests and statements of solidarity have poured in. The incident threatens to further isolate Israel politically, especially in Europe and among nations sympathetic to Palestinian suffering.

Meanwhile, Israel lobbied that the flotilla could offload aid via Israeli or neighboring ports instead of attempting direct maritime delivery — a proposal the organisers have rejected, arguing that such “alternatives” would undermine the mission’s purpose.

What This Could Mean Going Forward

If Israel continues to intercept, more activists may be detained, vessels seized, and legal fights amplified in international courts. The flotilla’s persistence could raise pressure on international organizations and governments to demand Gaza’s unimpeded humanitarian access.

But there’s also risk for the flotilla itself: reduced numbers, logistical challenges, or escalation if miscalculations occur at sea. The role of naval escorts, diplomatic protection, and real-time media coverage will be vital.

The episode also underscores how maritime protest has become a modern front in the Gaza crisis — a way for global civil society to physically confront blockades rather than merely protesting on land.

The waves off Gaza’s coast have always been contested, but now they are a stage for a broader clash — of law, humanity, power, and narrative. The Sumud Flotilla’s interception is not just a maritime event; it is a flashpoint in how supply, sovereignty, and resistance face off in one of the world’s most entrenched conflicts.