#submastrain

Suvi plagarized the work of Japanese artist @/touminnsit on Twitter which was posted May 11, 2025. (Link to the original art) (Archival link)

Suvi's "inspired" art was posted on May 15, 2025, 4 days later. They made the comment crediting the artist on May 17, 2025, 2 days later, only because they were caught trying to pass off another artist's work as their own.

Suvi deleted both Tweets regarding the art shortly afterward. The link to their art would have been ( https://x.com/1amSubmasTrain/status/1922960704048382188 )

This is an example of how Suvi is deceptive and doesn't care about others past what they can gain out of it. Plagarism is wrong and especially scummy from someone who supposedly cares so much about other blankship artists.

My anons wake up and say “how can we make Q crawl out of his skin?” Here goes!

“It doesn’t always have to be sexual” but this is so,,,,,, holy fuck.

Thank you for being respectful in stating that. I understand where you're coming from since it's normal to do studies or heavily reference things. Still, I think it's difficult to see otherwise in this situation so I'll explain my thoughts further. Taking inspiration and referencing isn't wrong, but even Suvi acknowledges (even if barely) that what they did can't only be excused as just studying.

They changed a few things, but it's still not different enough to be considered their own work. The placement is the same. While the poses and faces were changed a bit, the bottom right corner Emmet's bottom half are an almost exact copy with the legs and coat being positioned the same. Heavily referencing is generous when I'm sure Suvi can draw on their own just fine. It would be different if it were just a general picture used for pose/composition inspiration that both artists used coincidentally. The original work also being a fanart of Emmet that Suvi confirmed to reference is a bit much.

That aside, the main issue is their behavior surrounding their potential copying. They did so without credit and knew they were guilty upon being caught. It's a little shady for them to minimize things as "heavily referencing", "making mistakes", and potentially lying to gain the benefit of the doubt.