Perception is subjective. Reality is not.


#interview with the vampire#iwtv#amc tvl#jacob anderson#sam reid

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from India

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from Australia

seen from Australia
seen from Estonia
seen from China
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Spain

seen from Canada

seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
Perception is subjective. Reality is not.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
There is no sadness and no cruelty in that gaze; it is a gaze without adjectives, it is only, completely, a gaze which neither judges you nor appeals to you; it posits you, implicates you; makes you exist. But this creative gesture is endless; you keep on being born, you are sustained, carried to the end of a movement which is one of infinite origin, source, and which appears in an eternal state of suspension. God and the emperor had the power of the hand, man has the gaze. All history reaches the grandeur of its own mystery in an endless look.
Roland Barthes, Critical Essays
Spirit is never an object; nor a spiritual reality an objective one. In the so-called objective world there's no such nature, thing, or objective reality as spirit. Hence it is easy to deny the reality of spirit.
Nikolai Berdyaev, The Spirit and Reality
I have a body in the form of a human animal. I have desires, aversions, and beliefs that arise from reflecting on myself and the world and making judgments about them. I have language and reason, which I can use to communicate and make inferences. I have memories of past experiences and imaginings of possible future experiences. I have connections to other people â parents, ancestors, friends, and lovers. I have a story of myself that is all of these things put together into a single narrative.
But none of these things that I possess is me. Not even their combination is me. I am the entity that experiences, the subject that perceives and feels and thinks. While it is true that my ability to do these things depends on my body being alive, even my body is not me.
Read more...

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
âIf, as Catharine MacKinnon states in the essay cited earlier on, âsexuality is to feminism what work is to marxism: that which is most oneâs own, yet most taken awayâ (p. 515), that which is most personal and at the same time most socially determined, most defining of the self and most exploited or controlled, then to ask the question of what constitutes female sexuality, for women and for feminism (the emphasis is important), is to come to know things in a different way, and to come to know them as political. Since one âbecomes a womanâ through the experience of sexuality, issues such as lesbianism, contraception, abortion, incest, sexual harassment, rape, prostitution, and pornography are not merely social (a problem for society as a whole) or merely sexual (a private affair between âconsenting adultsâ or within the privacy of the family); for women, they are political and epistemological. âTo feminism, the personal is epistemologically the political, and its epistemology is its politicsâ (p. 535). This is the sense in which it is possible to argue as MacKinnon does, that consciousness raising is a âcritical method,â a specific mode of apprehension or âappropriationâ of reality. The fact that today the expression âconsciousness raisingâ has become dated and more than slightly unpleasant, as any word will that has been appropriated, diluted, digested and spewed out by the media, does not diminish the social and subjective impact of a practiceâthe collective articulation of one's experience of sexuality and genderâwhich has produced, and continues to elaborate, a radically new mode of understanding the subjectâs relation to social-historical reality. Consciousness raising is the original critical instrument that women have developed toward such understanding, the analysis of social reality, and its critical revision. The Italian feminists call it âautocoscienza,â selfconsciousness, and better still, self consciousness. For example, Manuela Fraire: âthe practice of self consciousness is the way in which women reflect politically on their own condition.ââ[33]
from Alice Doesnât: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema by Teresa de Lauretis
Additional citations: Catherine A. MacKinnonâs âFeminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theoryâ; Manuela Fraireâs âLa politica del femminismoâ
Regarding the "Does RWBY like women?" poll (yes, yes it does BTW).
You know... the whole poll debacle reminded me of something.
RWBY helped me expand my media diet by telling me that just because people hate something enmass, it could just all be bullshit coupled with mob mentality.
Instead of hatedoms getting me to think:
"Damn, I don't even wanna be associated with that show based on the rage it inspires."
My more skeptical brain is like:
"Okay, so why is it reeeeeeeally hated? Is it reeeeeeeally bad or are people going along with the crowd because critical thinking is too much of a burden in this capitalist hellscape?"
Because bad media literacy is in part a result of the fact that most geeks and normies alike aren't out to be legit critics but rather just want to enjoy the thing, gush about the thing and so forth. They can't exactly articulate their reasonings why like they're trying to get an A+ in Therapy Studies.
And THAT is how the YouTube Video Essay and Angry Critic scene takes off.
We dunk on the Nostalgia Critic (often for VERY real IRL grievances) but his catchphrase: "I remember it so you don't have to" is something many who'd come after would take to heart. These video maker people are taking about a thing you like and are explaining it in a way you not only agree with but makes you feel vindicated.
Be it for love... or for hate.
Because hatedom circles like the RWDE looks to video essays that reassure them, keep them from doubting their stance on the thing and how they enforce it.
With the burden of actually seeing the thing and thinking hard taken off of them, people can confidently say things like "RWBY prioritizes Jaune" despite not looking at any potential evidence in the show that might contridice it.
Which is why this is a call for everyone to question the popular opinions.
Does Jaune Arc reeeeeeally get that much narrative importance at the expense of the main girls?
Was Jaune reeeeeeeally a self-insert?
Was Ironwood reaaaaaally derailed in his character arc?
Was Adam reeeeeeeeally representative of the Faunus?
Was the Faunus reaaaaaally offensive?
And of course...
Was Monty Oum reeeeeeeeally the only one who's vision matter to the show above all else?
Ask yourself these questions and do the work to back them up. If people are giving you responses that contridict you, responses that take evidence from the work itself more often than not, then try to do the same in turn.
Think about that show or movie being panned? What if... you actually like it?
Not everybody is a critic... but we can at least try to.