#steven paddock

Democrat: *shoots and kills 58 people, wounds 400+ more at a concert*

Democrats: “we need too stop mass shooting by banning guns and getting rid of the 2nd Amendment!!”

As the days have passed from the mass shooting on October 1st 2017, the attention of the public has shifted to the ongoing debate about whether the gunman, Stephen Paddock, is a terrorist or not. Many articles were published on the subject within three days of the shooting. The argument goes that Stephen Paddock is not being labeled a terrorist because he is white, and that a darker skinned person would be labeled a terrorist immediately. I think that this discussion all together is offensive.

The event that took place killed at least 58 people and injured more than 500 others. The fact that people are thinking about this on a grander scale three days after the event is abhorrent. 58 people died. 500 people were injured. It is disgraceful to the families who are mourning to take this and morph it into an opportunity to fight even more. People died, people were injured, and no one knows how many more people were affected by this event. It destroys me to think that this is the world we live in. National tragedies are happening left and right, and all we can think of is proving what we think is absolutely and unequivocally correct. From the debates over shootings, floods, and earthquakes, it seems no one is thinking of the people actually grieving. The media is only showing those who are a secondary or tertiary source fighting about it.

We should be coming together and showing we care about the people who are affected by what has happened. Talking about race is important, don’t get me wrong. The problem with this situation is the timing. There has been no time to gain perspective. When the articles were published about the “terrorism debate”, there wasn’t even a solid timeline about the events that There needs to be room to think before people start shouting at one another. There should be discussion about if Paddock is a terrorism, but not then, and maybe even not now. There’s not even a clear motive as of when I am writing this. Until this is, this topic should be tabled.

Shooter’s Hotel Room: Bad News After What Was Just Found on Shooter’s Hotel Room Video, Who He Was Caught Paying -Video

BAD News After What Was Just Found On Shooter’s Hotel Room Video And Who He Was Caught Paying Details surrounding the Las Vegas shooter have been shrouded in secrecy over the last two days. The country has been waiting for answers as to how a seemingly average older man, who blended into society, died in infamy Sunday night after committing the largest shooting our country has ever seen. He wasn’t known for having any political or religious views and no recon knowledge to plan an attack like this in such fine detail.

Perhaps knowing that he wasn’t going to leave his Mandalay Bay hotel suite alive, 64-year-old Steven Paddock decided to film himself within the three days he occupied his room. This footage along with some crucial financial evidence has now surfaced and the pieces of the horrific puzzle are starting to come together forming an answer to a motive that every American has been waiting to hear.

New Post has been published on https://www.hagmannreport.com/from-the-wires/we-have-looked-at-everything-still-no-clear-motive-for-las-vegas-attack-officials-say/

'We have looked at everything': Still no clear motive for Las Vegas attack, officials say