#step length

"In walking faster than 3 km/h, transverse pelvic rotation lengthens the step (“pelvic step”). The shift in pelvis–thorax coordination from in-phase to out of phase with increasing velocity was found to depend on the pelvis beginning to move in-phase with the femur, while the thorax continued to counter rotate with respect to the femur. "

We are always trying to bring greater understanding to this group at TGG regarding gait mechanics. One must understand the implications of rotational work, and anti-rotational work on the phasic and antiphasic nature of the thorax and the pelvis. We have talked about becoming more phasic when there is spine pain. With today's study, we delve just al little deeper, particularly noting how the pelvis and the femur moving together first, before that is offset by the antiphasic nature of the thorax at higher speeds of gait. This article uses the terms in phase and out of phase. We have learned over time that those terms to relate more so the description of how the limbs are, or are not, pairing up when a couple is walking together. None the less, the reader here should understand how they are referring to out of phase as antiphasic.

In this article, I tell you how you can teach someone to march with a 30” step.

Does running cadence matter? Not as much as previously thought (in terms of speed and efficiency, but this is not a comment on altering biomechanics to avoid or manage running through injury. One of the first things we ask of a runner, who insists they will be running with their injury while we attempt to get ahead of it, is to increase their cadence and land with more finesse (if they are a heavy "plunker", which often happens on longer runs when people fatigue).

“Some ran at 160 steps per minutes and others ran at 210 steps per minute, and it wasn’t related at all to how good they were or how fast they were,” Burns said. “Height influenced it a little bit, but even people who were the same height had an enormous amount of variability.”

"Another unexpected finding is that by the end of a race, cadence varied much less per minute, as if the fatigued runner’s body had locked into an optimal steps-per-minute turnover. It’s unclear why, Burns said, but this deserves further study."

When they walk back. What we are not aware of. Gait initiation is a different and more complex motor program than the simple gait motor program.

Here is a little something we do in our clinics, all the time. When the session room is open for the next client, we greet our client in the lobby. We do not have our staff send them back to the room to change and wait for us. We watch them closely, but without them knowing. How does the client stand up? How do they initiate their gait cycle ? How is their balance? How do they carry their bags, purse, backpack ? We ask them to head back to the session room to get changed, letting them think we are grabbing a drink of water. And then, in a sneaky manner, we watch them stand, initiate gait, and walk back to the room. We do this, because, gait initiation is separate motor program. It requires several component parts, a squat, weight shift, double support balance acquisition, COP (center of pressure acquisition), step length precalculations, step width precalculation, foot strike targeting, weight shift again, initial weight transition, and then the gait cycle. And gait initiation is different and asymmetrical in people with pain, we know this for a fact in clients with painful osteoarthritis. These clients develop adaptive posturomotor strategies that shorten the monopodal phase on the affected leg.* For many gait disorders, these are the component parts that will first show up if there is a problem in the system. Gait initiation is more difficult than gait perpetuation. Besides, how we walk when we do not think we are being watched, when we are carrying our things (purse, phone, bottle of water, backpack, etc) is how we typically walk. Clients will show all the goodies we need to see: the turned out foot, the hiked shoulder, the limps, the staggers, stumbles, speed, step width, and the like. We also get to see how they move in the shoes they live in, the heeled ones, the broken down ones, the work shoes.

So, when your client is having a formal treadmill gait analysis, what are you seeing? Their best behavior, or the truth ? One thing is for sure, you do not see the most important program the precedes their treadmill analysis, namely, how they get out of the chair and up onto the treadmill. This stuff matters. There are clues everywhere, grab all of them, in as natural a manner as possible.

The Gait Guys

Researchers have discovered that we most accurately hit targets when we see them 1 to 1.5 steps ahead of where we were. This is more difficult that it seems because we are making a plan, and at the same time we're making that plan, we're making a movement based on the stuff that we saw a second and half in the past. Below this link, you will find our post on projecting and estimating steps. Much along the same lines but with a great video to set it up.

We have talked about step with hundreds of times it seems. We get asked all the time about optimal or proper step width in our runners, especially the ones that have a tendency to drop into the higher risk category of "cross over" gait. We like to refer them to our standard reply, "many good things happen with increasing your step width, but there is no need to go beyond the hip distance width, no wider than the hips. You should find more gluteal activation there. However, this is less economical than a narrower step width. But, the narrower the step width, you are juggling the increased economy with increased liability (for injury) and riskier biomechanics. One must earn their way into the higher economy narrow step width with gaining durability in these potentially riskier narrow step with mechanics. Failure to do so is a choice taken at your own risk." This article suggest costly risks to a narrow step width as well.

From the Shorter Abstract

"Humans tend to walk economically, with preferred step width and length corresponding to an energetic optimum. In the case of step width, it is costlier to walk with either wider or narrower steps than normally preferred. Wider steps require more mechanical work to redirect the body's motion laterally with each step, but the cost for narrower steps remains unexplained. Here we show that narrow steps are costly because they require the swing leg to be circumducted around the stance leg. And, we could not agree more. There is definitely a sweet spot for every runner, finding it, and earning the durability required to fend off injury is where the magic lies. RAther than tell your runners where to place their feet , thus you defining their step width, give your clients the appropriate hip and frontal plane stability work to find their low risk sweet spot. After all, most of the foot posturing placement is dictated from the hip and pelvis mechanics, as we have written about extensively previously.

Gait Posture. 2017 Mar 23;54:265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.021.

The high cost of swing leg circumduction during human walking.

Shorter KA1, Wu AR2, Kuo AD3.

  We speak often about the 3 foot rockers, with particular attention often to ankle rocker (ankle mortise). But one must not forget about the rear and forefoot rockers, they have their important place as well. But, we all too often only think of these parameters when the foot is on the ground.  The truth is, the swing limb is very important as well. How we swing, how the foot prepares for initial contact is also critical. 

Last week Ivo wrote about toe walkers, a topic we have written about several times previously on our blog "The Gait Guys". 

In this study, the researchers were appearing to look at plantarflexion posturing of the foot-ankle complex. the noted that"unilateral restricted ankle motion influenced kinematics mainly in the swing phase" as we proposed. Again, swing phase is just as critical as the stance phase of gait.  One might recall our mnemonic, "when the foot is on the ground, the glutes are in charge, and when the foot is in the air, the abdominals are in charge". This admittedly is a very loose statement, but it has its place to begin the dialogue. Meaning, there is more to it.  Yes, the hip flexors are key, but they have to be active on a precursor, sufficient control of the pelvis, via the abdominals in part.  To this point, the researchers noted that, "hip and knee peak flexion in the swing phase were increased on the restricted side". Meaning, that to clear a plantarflexed foot-ankle complex, one might have to accentuate flexion elsewhere.  No rocket science here. This is the "foot drop" strategy most of us are all to familiar with. People with foot drop have an inability to dorsiflex the ankle to clear the ground in swing, thus, to avoid tripping, one has to flex the limb higher up the chain, perhaps even hike the pelvis with the opposite leg hip abductors (plus a little frontal plane lean perhaps). This article however discusses restrictions, and not what we just discussed, loss of function. 

Furthermore, "Walking with unilateral restricted ankle motion had a negative effect on walking velocity, cadence, step time, and step length." Gait Posture. 2015 Mar;41(3):835-40.  Immediate effects of unilateral restricted ankle motion on gait kinematics in healthy subjects.  Romkes J1, Schweizer K2.