#spinuids

用集玄论来解释光的波粒二重性。光的玻璃二重性。光就像是一幅用马赛克或者是像素拼成的画。 在你用那个双孔实验观察的时候，如果你另外设置一个仪器用来观察每一个光子的话，那就等于在看这幅画的时候是看它的像素，每个那个单独的像素，那自然这幅画就成马赛克状，是一粒一粒的，那个成粒子状。如果不用任何仪器去观察每个单独的光子，那就等于是远看这一幅画，这幅画就成为一个画，就就那用光的话来说，就成为那个光波，这就呈现那个波性。 所以你，你这一幅画，又可以成为将来一个更大的观察点的一个像素，或者你每一个像素，如果你再用细小的观察点去观察的话，也可能成为一幅画。呃关键的一点在这里最关键的一点就是如何判断一个物就是一个一个状就是任何物件在什么情况下他是那个从从一个急转向一个璇或者呃璇是对的从一个旋转像一个急旋在这里是指的是那个wave那个呃急在这里指particle.  

如果能在能能用一个很科学的理论来解释，就是如何预测把这个玄变成齐的话，那个在那个，那这个李集学论就会在那个自然科学的各种应用方面就产生极大的作用，那也，我觉得应该也能很在在宏观上能够能够统一相对论和量子物理，这样对那个科学发展是无贡献，是无限大的。

Interpreting the Wave-Particle Duality of Light with Zhuangzi's Philosophy

The Mosaic Analogy: Unveiling the Duality

Imagine a painting composed of tiny mosaic tiles or pixels. When observed through a double-slit experiment, where each photon is monitored individually, it's like examining the individual pixels, revealing the mosaic structure, the particle-like nature of light.

Conversely, observing the painting without scrutinizing each pixel is akin to viewing it from a distance, transforming the mosaic into a unified image, representing light's wave-like behavior.

This analogy extends further. Consider a pixel in a larger painting; it can become a pixel in an even larger observation.Similarly, a pixel, when examined with finer resolution, could transform into a painting itself.

The Key: Identifying the Transition

The crux lies in determining when an object transitions from wave to particle. In Zhuangzi's philosophy, this transition is akin to the transformation of a spinning wheel from a rapid rotation to a static state, or vice versa.

Towards a Unified Scientific Theory

If we can scientifically explain this transition, Zhuangzi's philosophy could revolutionize natural science applications. It could potentially unify relativity and quantum physics, making an immense contribution to scientific advancement.

The Potential Impact

A unified theory derived from Zhuangzi's philosophy could have profound implications for various fields, including:

Quantum Computing: Enhanced understanding of quantum phenomena could lead to breakthroughs in quantum computing, enabling faster and more powerful computers.

Material Science: A deeper grasp of the wave-particle duality could revolutionize material science, leading to the development of novel materials with extraordinary properties.

Cosmology: Unraveling the mysteries of light's behavior could shed light on the origins of the universe and the nature of dark matter and dark energy.

Conclusion

Two new entries

To Val : : The thing is, no matter how fantastical, interesting, or 'scientifically corrected' the current quantum mechanics theory looks like, it is by far, only a part of a much larger picture. According to my theory of spinuids. Quantum theory itself is 'quantised'. Quantum property (particle) of anything alternates with its non-quantum functions (waves) when the observation scale changes. In other words. When you observe light on a scale of daily life, they behave like waves. When you observe light on nano-scale, it behave like particles (becomes quantised). However, who says this alternation of behavior stops there? Theory of spinuids would dictate that once we go even more extreme on to scales, the property will change again. So, towards a smaller scale, maybe when we can observe pass the planck distance (and no it's not a limit of nature, but only a limit of our current observation method and our logic deduction (and no, logic is not absolute)), light (in this case photon) will behave like wave again. The string theory or m-theory partly demonstrate that. String <=> wave .... and all is spinuids. Towards a larger scale, when things are far enough, or mass are large enough, or the observation scale are grand enough, light and energy (and everything) will again no longer behave like a wave, but a particle <=> a mathematical point. Thus comes the black holes, thus is the reason we seem to observe the 'big bang'. But actually, these are just the threshold, the limit we observe, and the limit where the property alternation between wave and particle took place. the moment when 'spin' becomes 'uids'. (read 'uids' as a flipped 'spin'.) Where the positive infinity and negative infinity connects, and all becomes a 'spiral'. And this alternation never ceases. Inside the black hole, there is another universe where everything behaves similar but slightly altered physical & mathematical laws. Below the planck distance, there is yet another such alternative universe. And before the big band, there is another, and so on and so forth. To think we live in the only occurrence of the cosmos at large is a very 'arrogant' view. It's just like we used to think we are in the centre of the world (physically & metaphysically). According to my theory of spinuids, there is no end, there is no begining, there is only alternation from one to the other, from yin to yang, from +infinity to -infinity. So sorry Einstein, and your theory of relativity, it can only apply up to a certain scale, beyond which the theory will break down. Same as quantum physics, it can only apply down to a certain scale, below which 'particle' will break down. And the current view of theoretical physics confuses these two. A quantum particle is not a cosmological particle. So we CANNOT look at photons from a star far away, as we look at a photon on a quantum scale in our lab and expect it would behave the same. Once we understand this principle, we can they easily unite quantum physics and general theory of relativity, and expand it far beyond. The wave-particle duality is not 2 sides of a coin, but the 2 sides of a 'spinning' coin. Big bang is not the beginning, same as the birth of one individual life form is not origin of LIFE itself. Universe on the grandest and smallest scales, are Eternal! There is no begining, there is no end! Isn't that more elegant and more simple? - : :

———————————— 20-nov-2016

Rieman hypothethesis : : When series are convergent then association and 結合律 can apply it is because when to series are convergent under the same circumstant, they are spinuids of the same level. Convergent series (same level spinuids) are operatable (only)

Standard convergent => Cesaro convergent Cesaro convergent is to raise a level of spinuids Higher order of Cesaro convergence => higher level of spinuids

————25 oct-2015——————

New way to define Nth Dimension : :

Zeroth dimension => On or off the mathematical point (no quantify property, only binary)

One dimension => On or off the Zeroth dimension and how ‘far’ is it from Zeroth dimension in a whatever unit => Like this it can easily include a curved line as a one dimension object.

2D => On or off the 1D line (straight or curved) and how ‘far’ is it from 1D in a whatever unit => Like this it can easily include a curved surface as 2D object.

3D => On or off the 2D surface (flat or curved) and how ‘far’ is it from 2D in a whatever unit => Like this it can easily include a curved space in 3D (so we don’t need to involve the concept of ‘time’ to consider how gravity actually ‘distorts’ space)

Now the brilliant point : : HOW ABOUT WE CONSIDER THAT OUR COSMOS IS A 2D+2D object (spinuids)? Instead of 3D space + 1D time?