theory of spinuids : : 極旋相對論

用集玄论来解释光的波粒二重性。光的玻璃二重性。光就像是一幅用马赛克或者是像素拼成的画。 在你用那个双孔实验观察的时候，如果你另外设置一个仪器用来观察每一个光子的话，那就等于在看这幅画的时候是看它的像素，每个那个单独的像素，那自然这幅画就成马赛克状，是一粒一粒的，那个成粒子状。如果不用任何仪器去观察每个单独的光子，那就等于是远看这一幅画，这幅画就成为一个画，就就那用光的话来说，就成为那个光波，这就呈现那个波性。 所以你，你这一幅画，又可以成为将来一个更大的观察点的一个像素，或者你每一个像素，如果你再用细小的观察点去观察的话，也可能成为一幅画。呃关键的一点在这里最关键的一点就是如何判断一个物就是一个一个状就是任何物件在什么情况下他是那个从从一个急转向一个璇或者呃璇是对的从一个旋转像一个急旋在这里是指的是那个wave那个呃急在这里指particle.  

如果能在能能用一个很科学的理论来解释，就是如何预测把这个玄变成齐的话，那个在那个，那这个李集学论就会在那个自然科学的各种应用方面就产生极大的作用，那也，我觉得应该也能很在在宏观上能够能够统一相对论和量子物理，这样对那个科学发展是无贡献，是无限大的。

Interpreting the Wave-Particle Duality of Light with Zhuangzi's Philosophy

The Mosaic Analogy: Unveiling the Duality

Imagine a painting composed of tiny mosaic tiles or pixels. When observed through a double-slit experiment, where each photon is monitored individually, it's like examining the individual pixels, revealing the mosaic structure, the particle-like nature of light.

Conversely, observing the painting without scrutinizing each pixel is akin to viewing it from a distance, transforming the mosaic into a unified image, representing light's wave-like behavior.

This analogy extends further. Consider a pixel in a larger painting; it can become a pixel in an even larger observation.Similarly, a pixel, when examined with finer resolution, could transform into a painting itself.

The Key: Identifying the Transition

The crux lies in determining when an object transitions from wave to particle. In Zhuangzi's philosophy, this transition is akin to the transformation of a spinning wheel from a rapid rotation to a static state, or vice versa.

Towards a Unified Scientific Theory

If we can scientifically explain this transition, Zhuangzi's philosophy could revolutionize natural science applications. It could potentially unify relativity and quantum physics, making an immense contribution to scientific advancement.

The Potential Impact

A unified theory derived from Zhuangzi's philosophy could have profound implications for various fields, including:

Quantum Computing: Enhanced understanding of quantum phenomena could lead to breakthroughs in quantum computing, enabling faster and more powerful computers.

Material Science: A deeper grasp of the wave-particle duality could revolutionize material science, leading to the development of novel materials with extraordinary properties.

Cosmology: Unraveling the mysteries of light's behavior could shed light on the origins of the universe and the nature of dark matter and dark energy.

Conclusion

Two new entries

To Val : : The thing is, no matter how fantastical, interesting, or 'scientifically corrected' the current quantum mechanics theory looks like, it is by far, only a part of a much larger picture. According to my theory of spinuids. Quantum theory itself is 'quantised'. Quantum property (particle) of anything alternates with its non-quantum functions (waves) when the observation scale changes. In other words. When you observe light on a scale of daily life, they behave like waves. When you observe light on nano-scale, it behave like particles (becomes quantised). However, who says this alternation of behavior stops there? Theory of spinuids would dictate that once we go even more extreme on to scales, the property will change again. So, towards a smaller scale, maybe when we can observe pass the planck distance (and no it's not a limit of nature, but only a limit of our current observation method and our logic deduction (and no, logic is not absolute)), light (in this case photon) will behave like wave again. The string theory or m-theory partly demonstrate that. String <=> wave .... and all is spinuids. Towards a larger scale, when things are far enough, or mass are large enough, or the observation scale are grand enough, light and energy (and everything) will again no longer behave like a wave, but a particle <=> a mathematical point. Thus comes the black holes, thus is the reason we seem to observe the 'big bang'. But actually, these are just the threshold, the limit we observe, and the limit where the property alternation between wave and particle took place. the moment when 'spin' becomes 'uids'. (read 'uids' as a flipped 'spin'.) Where the positive infinity and negative infinity connects, and all becomes a 'spiral'. And this alternation never ceases. Inside the black hole, there is another universe where everything behaves similar but slightly altered physical & mathematical laws. Below the planck distance, there is yet another such alternative universe. And before the big band, there is another, and so on and so forth. To think we live in the only occurrence of the cosmos at large is a very 'arrogant' view. It's just like we used to think we are in the centre of the world (physically & metaphysically). According to my theory of spinuids, there is no end, there is no begining, there is only alternation from one to the other, from yin to yang, from +infinity to -infinity. So sorry Einstein, and your theory of relativity, it can only apply up to a certain scale, beyond which the theory will break down. Same as quantum physics, it can only apply down to a certain scale, below which 'particle' will break down. And the current view of theoretical physics confuses these two. A quantum particle is not a cosmological particle. So we CANNOT look at photons from a star far away, as we look at a photon on a quantum scale in our lab and expect it would behave the same. Once we understand this principle, we can they easily unite quantum physics and general theory of relativity, and expand it far beyond. The wave-particle duality is not 2 sides of a coin, but the 2 sides of a 'spinning' coin. Big bang is not the beginning, same as the birth of one individual life form is not origin of LIFE itself. Universe on the grandest and smallest scales, are Eternal! There is no begining, there is no end! Isn't that more elegant and more simple? - : :

———————————— 20-nov-2016

Rieman hypothethesis : : When series are convergent then association and 結合律 can apply it is because when to series are convergent under the same circumstant, they are spinuids of the same level. Convergent series (same level spinuids) are operatable (only)

Standard convergent => Cesaro convergent Cesaro convergent is to raise a level of spinuids Higher order of Cesaro convergence => higher level of spinuids

——————04 Nov-2015————————

As pink is not a spectrum colour yet human eye can very well perceive it. The premature cutting & short-circuiting of the spinuids circle (in this case, the cutting the visible light out of electro-magnetic spectrum and short-circuiting by connecting red-purple is what created pink.) can create “none-existence” phantoms in physical universe.

——————28 oct-2015————————

: : spinuids cosmology : :

at core of every thing / every one / every concept / every idea / and ALL, there lie spin(s), not one, not many, but two. they are inseparable yet self-similar, fractal and entangled yet each indomitable of the other. They are self-generated & self-sustained. They always pop in and out of existence together. Together, 2 as 1, they are call spinuids. However, to define or understand any spinuids, we must bias one spin over the other, and collapse the other into the axis of one spin with duo-poles. We must choose sides, spinuids are forever dynamic or imbalance. Perfectly static spinuids in balance is void itself. It is from void the cosmos / multiverse sprang. Yet, as long as anything / any one / any idea exists, the void exists not.

: :  極旋論 的宇宙觀  : :

萬物皆極旋。 在一切的核心，隱藏著, (不是一個，也不是很多,) 而是兩個自旋。他們是不可分離，自我相似的，分形的 爾又 相互糾纏，且一不屈不撓另一。他們始終存在於一起。 其二合一 稱 spinuids (極旋子)。 然而，若要定義或理解任何 spinuids 極旋，我們必須偏視一個自旋，並讓成另一成為這一自旋的兩極軸。 我們必須兩選其一。spinuids 極旋 永處於動態或不平衡狀態。 處於完美平衡靜態的 spinuids 是‘虛.空.無’的本身。 從‘虛.空.無’中 誕生了 多元宇宙。然而，只要任何一個物體/任何一個想法存在，‘虛.空.無.’便不存在。

The Way that can be told of is not an unvarying universal Way; The concept that can be named or defined cannot include all concepts. It was from the Nameless / Void that Heaven and Earth sprang; - Laozi << Dao De Jing >> Chapter 1 verse 1

————25 oct-2015——————

New way to define Nth Dimension : :

Zeroth dimension => On or off the mathematical point (no quantify property, only binary)

One dimension => On or off the Zeroth dimension and how ‘far’ is it from Zeroth dimension in a whatever unit => Like this it can easily include a curved line as a one dimension object.

2D => On or off the 1D line (straight or curved) and how ‘far’ is it from 1D in a whatever unit => Like this it can easily include a curved surface as 2D object.

3D => On or off the 2D surface (flat or curved) and how ‘far’ is it from 2D in a whatever unit => Like this it can easily include a curved space in 3D (so we don’t need to involve the concept of ‘time’ to consider how gravity actually ‘distorts’ space)

Now the brilliant point : : HOW ABOUT WE CONSIDER THAT OUR COSMOS IS A 2D+2D object (spinuids)? Instead of 3D space + 1D time?

spinuids mathematics : : The mathematics developed here are not to replace the classical mathematics, but to serve as a more specific tool for physics and all other empirical science.

image : : The grand cycle of empirical study shall remain intact under the scrutiny of spinuids, with slight modification to the logic behind the Induction & Deduction process. See Chapter 2 for more details.



spinuids mathematics : :  is fractal mathematics, it’s a self-contained, self-similar mathematical tool to the empirical study.

Major modification from the classical maths includes but not limited to : :

- number line => number circle : :  connecting the positive infinity and the negative infinity into one single position, the classical number line is turned into a spinuids number circle. - the ’size / circumference’ of the circle are finite, yet the number ‘dot’ it contains are infinite. - number => number circle : : each number ‘dot’ on the number circle is by itself a number circle as well. While the finite size of this number ‘dot’ circle is negligible, it is not absolute zero*. And the property of that number ‘dot’ being a number circle that contains number ‘dots’ of its own, should always be taken into consideration on all level of operations for empirical studies. - each number, whether or not it’s real, natural, irrational, or transcendental, all have it’s unique place on the number circle, and all are number circles by themselves.

- Because each number by itself is a number circle, no absolute accurate position can be give to any number on number circle. However, an accurate approximation can always be obtained. - Any approximation might become no longer accurate enough to describe the position of a number on the number circle if the circumstance so dictates.

(in other words, the spinuids number circle are made of number circles, and any number circle, are a ‘number’ on the number circle. self-contained, self-similar)  

The classical number 0 : : the 0 that shall be used to express the meaning of (absolute) 0, the absolute void, DOES NOT exist within the realm of spinuids mathematics. However, whenever necessary to evoke the absolute zero, we shall use the symbol ⦁ (massive black dot).

- The 0 on spinuids number circle : : evoked by symbol ⊙ (dot within a circle), is defined by the current position, the initial position, or the ground status. ⊙ however shall always have a value, and is not by definition any different from any other number on the number circle. - The position of ⊙ on number circle can shift under circumstances. - ⊙ ≢ ⦁  ⊙ ≄ ⦁

The classical ∞  : :  that shall be used to express the meaning of (absolute) Infinity, the absolute ALL, the absolute Everthing, DOES NOT exist within the realm of spinuids mathematics. However, whenever necessary to evoke the absolute infinity, we shall use the symbol ∞ (massive bold). - spinuids infinity : : evoked by symbol ⊚ (circle within a circle)

underneath needs refinement

- spinuids negation : : evoked by symbol ⊝ (dash/minus sign inside a circle), ⊝N (negation of number N) means taking the opposite position of N on the number circle by placing exactly the same distance between left and right …

The implication of this is HUGE.

现实就像个洋葱，去更深我们需要一层一层的剝。 但总是会有内在，因为它是外表尽可能多层。 所以下一次我们遙望地平线，我们要问自己， 我们在哪层？我们在看哪层？我们想要去多深？

reality is like an onion, we need to pill it layer by layer to go deeper. yet there will always be as much layer inside as it is outside. so next time we look at a horizon, we should always ask ourselves, which layer we are? which layer we look at? & how deep we wanna go?

: :  Simple, the event horizon is not a line, but a 2Ds-2Dt (yes, 2D space dimension and 2D temporal dimension) fussy shell, it is not an perfect mathematical sphere. It is a grey zone, with many many shades of grey. And has no clear boundary with our world (where lights can still escape)

: :  Inside the black hole, information is never lost, but transformed from our 3Ds-1Dt format, to 1Ds-3Dt format; (1D space dimension and 3D temporal dimension) until it reaches the SINGULARITY (which doesn’t really exist, according to theory of spinuids.)

: :  This “singularity” in classical astrophysics sense, is just merely an manifest or partial observation of spinuids REVELATION (which take places follows the law of revelation).

: :   So information is never lost, information becomes unaccessible. Information enters the event horizon of a blackhole does not depart our physical world. Blackhole is a part of our physical world.