Linguistics
Was thinking a bit about the divide that exists between academic language andĀ āregularā language. Itās sort of funny to me, and absurd in a way (not that Iām not slightly conditioned to do the same at this point), how archaic and sort of unnecessarily complicated a lot of academic papers and such really are. A thought that struck me was how there are a lot of unnecessary words out there, where any choice is just matter of avoiding sounding colloquial by any means.Ā
So is width of language always a good thing? Is linguistic choice always a good thing? Would using one language socially be more or less equitable?
I really donāt know.
Iām curious though..
If two words has, letās say, theoretically, exactly identical meanings, is there a value in keeping both or is there something inherently hierachical about it? I mean, we, as humans, tend to classify. It makes sense from a survival-perspective. Good, bad, whatever comes between.Ā
And then, can language really be separated from culture? Theoretically you can talk about identical meaning all you want, but is that everĀ something that exists in the field?Ā What about dying languages? If culture is language and language is culture, then itās worth protecting, isnāt it? At the same time there is the issue of whether a descriptor can ever be a sufficient approximation of the subject. What does it take to be ofĀ aĀ culture? Can you truly learn a culture or is it just a question of more or less successful assimilation? To know is not to understand.
Maybe itāll all end up as art in a museum one day; arrogant recollections of something that was real once, to others, but without anyone who could truly understand left.Ā












