#solostarwars

Listen. I am a huge... HUGE.. Darth Maul fan, love him to bits because he has so much potential, he is just one of the Star Wars characters that would have such a good movie plot because he's been through a lot and he's seen every side of the Galaxy, and he's fought the entire way.

This snippet of Maul was priceless, and I really hope they don't waste this opportunity.

Hopefully he appears more in action either in #Solo2 or he finally gets his own film.

As a devoted superfan of Star Wars, I felt the usual excitement towards knowing that a new Star Wars movie is coming up. I tried my best not to open any reviews from Rotten Tomatoes or any other websites that wrote an analysis. But as I finally watched the movie, left the cinema, processed Solo in my brain, and went home reading a review from the ‘said’ websites, I kind of understood (or maybe didn’t) why Solo was given such "harsh" ratings. Other People’s Opinions (Don’t Be Triggered) I admire the amount of work that is placed in every Star Wars Film; each movie is made out of creativity and magnificence. It never fails to give the audience that certain hype as we see what could be beyond our own world and unravel what life would be like living with other rationale creatures (like us) while being in one galactic empire. As much as I would love to annoyingly speak my love for Star Wars, some risks are there to take while criticizing one of the most historical films that ever existed in the world of Hollywood. Carefulness is the key with this one.

I understand why some people think that the movie is playing safe and they didn’t feel that much of a kick in the plot (it feels sad that some people think like this but an opinion is an opinion). With no bias aside, if I ever became someone else and am not that hyped about Solo, the movie would be like the third action movie you watched right after two really awesome and sickening action movies. Therefore, people think it's fine, it doesn’t suck, but you don’t have to watch it. An article I read said that Solo was the take-out cheeseburger that you ate in the middle of the night knowing how unnecessary it was because you ate a scrumptious dinner hours before (I think that it was pretty clever how this writer described his feelings towards the film but then I don’t think the same way). People felt neutral about it, even the ratings on Rotten Tomatoes said that only 58 percent agreed that the movie is good. It was characterized as one of the movies with the potential to put you to sleep while being in the cinema. Even though this movie has been subjected as boring by half of the audience, we could say that the trouble in the production phase could be the probable root of ‘mediocrity’. Two of the main directors, Phil Lord and Chris Miller exited the team halfway of the film’s progress. It is even said that Miller and Lord’s style of filmmaking did not match the Lucasfilm’s franchise, that’s why another director had to switch their place.

As a devoted superfan of Star Wars, I felt the usual excitement towards knowing that a new Star Wars movie is coming up. I tried my best not to open any reviews from Rotten Tomatoes or any other websites that wrote an analysis. But as I finally watched the movie, left the cinema, processed Solo in my brain, and went home reading a review from the ‘said’ websites, I kind of understood (or maybe didn’t) why Solo was given such "harsh" ratings. Other People’s Opinions (Don’t Be Triggered) I admire the amount of work that is placed in every Star Wars Film; each movie is made out of creativity and magnificence. It never fails to give the audience that certain hype as we see what could be beyond our own world and unravel what life would be like living with other rationale creatures (like us) while being in one galactic empire. As much as I would love to annoyingly speak my love for Star Wars, some risks are there to take while criticizing one of the most historical films that ever existed in the world of Hollywood. Carefulness is the key with this one.

I understand why some people think that the movie is playing safe and they didn’t feel that much of a kick in the plot (it feels sad that some people think like this but an opinion is an opinion). With no bias aside, if I ever became someone else and am not that hyped about Solo, the movie would be like the third action movie you watched right after two really awesome and sickening action movies. Therefore, people think it's fine, it doesn’t suck, but you don’t have to watch it. An article I read said that Solo was the take-out cheeseburger that you ate in the middle of the night knowing how unnecessary it was because you ate a scrumptious dinner hours before (I think that it was pretty clever how this writer described his feelings towards the film but then I don’t think the same way). People felt neutral about it, even the ratings on Rotten Tomatoes said that only 58 percent agreed that the movie is good. It was characterized as one of the movies with the potential to put you to sleep while being in the cinema. Even though this movie has been subjected as boring by half of the audience, we could say that the trouble in the production phase could be the probable root of ‘mediocrity’. Two of the main directors, Phil Lord and Chris Miller exited the team halfway of the film’s progress. It is even said that Miller and Lord’s style of filmmaking did not match the Lucasfilm’s franchise, that’s why another director had to switch their place.