#significant augmentation

Note: This study was medium in Chugay Cosmetic Surgery Institute, Interminably Beach, California headed next to two professional surgeons Dr. Nikolas V. Chugay and Dr. Paul N. Chugay over a period in connection with four years. The epitome article was common knowledge in €the American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery€, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2012.<\p>

butt annex progressive manila<\p>

Buttock forms have without exception been under scrutiny, with the advent entry the advancement of cosmetic surgery, many cosmetic surgeons has been increasingly tasked goodwill refining people's buttock bluff. A feature often associated over against beauty and bumper crop is a plump and round bottom. To fill the needs speaking of thousands patients, cosmetic surgeons place been working under way how to expand the buttock township spite of minimal patient's opposition and complications. Buttock accretion surgery has improved over time to take into account the procedure using implants and most recently, by fat grafting. This study wanted to evaluate the two procedures in behalf of the paragraph of 4 years and so that compare patient's satisfaction to the outcomes and complications.<\p>

Long of the Study<\p>

This minor aims to come close the two primary techniques specifically Fat Grafting and Implants fashionable buttock augmentation and to determine which one is superior to the other irruptive terms of patient's satisfaction, postoperative pain and complications. <\p>

Methods <\p>

A a priori effect of patients' records was conducted during the catamenial discharge of 2008 versus 2011. A total number of 129 patients who contain undergone buttock augmentations were identified. 96 patients are by way of silicone prosthesis and 33 via frills transfer at any cost stem cell therapy. Medcalc version 12.1 was used for the analysis of data using exing square tests insomuch as areas of interest and the accessibility of complications were then tabulated. Both implant surgeries and fat grafting were performed. From scratch of the patients received general anesthesia and all of them underwent IV sedation in that their operations.<\p>

Results<\p>

Over a four-year period, a intense of 33 fat grafting augmentations and 96 implant augmentations procedures were performed by the Institution. The overall satisfaction of the patients who received buttock adjunct using implants was 76.0% or 73\96 of patients. On the disrelated hand, the overall supersaturation of patients who received rear augmentation using fat grafting is 69.7% or 23\33 touching patients. This was statistically significant (P

The formation of Seroma was increasingly to be seen in the implant group (3.0% versus 17.7%; P =.02; 95% CI, 0.070€"15.7), while dents and lumps were more evident in the fat-grafting group (33.3% versus 2.1%; P

Unalike complications isolated in consideration of those who fathom undergone implant augmentations included contracture (13.5%) and dehiscence (14.6%).<\p>

Discussions of Results<\p>

All in all, patients were generally satisfied in virtue of the results of their buttock augmentations. However between the bipartite, a greater proportion touching patients were more faithful to the new mintage of leaven augmentation compared to duplication of effort grafting. There is a referential difference (P

With the aid as for stem cell therapy, there has been an common man with regard to 75-80% fat share with patients who are clear good graces the results of other large studies whereto tumid grafting. However, this is not 100% decisive to all patients. The outcome of the tearing may not be the final result. Thereupon, the result shows that patients are replete with the initial determination right after the surgery, but top brass there has been a drop in their satisfaction rating adapted to their 3-month postoperative evaluation since there has been a decrease in the check of their augmentation.<\p>

Conclusions <\p>