Am I the last Holmesian to learn that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (yes, that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) co-wrote a trilogy of mystery novels starring Mycroft?
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
Am I the last Holmesian to learn that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (yes, that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) co-wrote a trilogy of mystery novels starring Mycroft?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Sherlockiana and Literary Scholarship
The most prevalent of Sherlockian and Holmesian theorists were and are generally those involved in academics before their engagement with the practice of Sherlockiana; that is, a decidedly un-meta critique of the Sherlock Holmes saga, whose sole activity is explaining discrepancies not with artistic merit but with real-world functional answers. These figures include Dorothy L. Sayers and Ronald Knox, alumni of Oxford, in medieval literature and classics respectively; fellow theologists and key figures in detective fiction’s generic discourse. There is Professor Jay Finley Christ and David Stuart Davies, who wrote his university dissertation on Conan Doyle; and Leslie S. Klinger who is noted as a leading expert on the most critically pervasive of the Victorian literary canon. Their analytical dispositions latched onto Sherlock Holmes as a fun, unserious exercise of a skill—Holmes being quite suited to this as a rather low-brow piece of literature but one full of encouragements to use powers of observation and mordancy. However, for myself, entering this space from the young age of fifteen created Holmes as my very introduction to this treatment of literature. I had been drawn into the key common interest of this sphere: literary analysis.
And not merely any surface level of literary analysis, but a kind in which one reads their text so many times it is memorised inside and out in their head. The text is no longer treated as a linear story but as an artifact rich with data, where its navigation then develops into a roving fashion; moving forwards and backwards, sometimes by large leaps, to cross-examine and make sense of its data. This level of knowledge and commitment in approach is required for the makings of chronologies and elaborate Sherlockian theories. I now use this same approach in my learning of literary theory and criticism—to pay attention to each and every word, to understand them anew on each return, to love them thoroughly and navigate them like a treasure map, and then evaluating and developing seminal readings. In imitating Sherlockians, I imitated academics, and unknowingly developed the skills required for sedulous literary study.
Why is it a truism right now on Bsky that Sherlock Holmes was into phrenology, when it literally never comes up in canon to my recollection
Sure, he has an overreliance on old fashioned ideas about physiognomy (but not even as often as people think), and his forensics can be pre-scientific (though I think a lot of people would be dismayed at what modern-day forensics is like), but not phrenology. That was a highly specific insane thing that was largely out of vogue before Holmes was ever (fictionally) born and which, while it slightly poked its head into early anthropology, was not really one of Holmes's vices. (MAYBE Dr Mortimer's, though?)
Incidentally: you want a book with weird phrenology? Jane Eyre.
"Criticise me: does my forehead not please you?” He lifted up the sable waves of hair which lay horizontally over his brow, and showed a solid enough mass of intellectual organs, but an abrupt deficiency where the suave sign of benevolence should have risen. “Now, ma’am, am I a fool?” “Far from it, sir. You would, perhaps, think me rude if I inquired in return whether you are a philanthropist?” “There again! Another stick of the penknife, when she pretended to pat my head: and that is because I said I did not like the society of children and old women (low be it spoken!). No, young lady, I am not a general philanthropist; but I bear a conscience;” and he pointed to the prominences which are said to indicate that faculty, and which, fortunately for him, were sufficiently conspicuous; giving, indeed, a marked breadth to the upper part of his head: “and, besides, I once had a kind of rude tenderness of heart."
Now THAT's phrenology.
Mid-Nero Wolfe kick, read the Arnold Zeck trilogy, and it is actually wild how In The Best Families is basically just The Final Problem/The Empty House, His Last Bow, and Charles Augustus Milverton shoved in a blender.
What else would one expect, after all, from an irreverent* yet devoted Sherlockian and Baker Street Irregular like Rex Stout?
*I defy anyone to apply another term to the writer and deliverer of the 1941 BSI dinner keynote, Watson was a Woman, in which Stout claimed that Watson was a woman, that she was married to Holmes, that this female Watson was also Irene Adler, and that they, improbably, were the parents of, for some reason, Lord Peter Wimsey of all people.
That said... and spoilers for the book itself below the cut...
In case you were still thinking about Sadie Shaw:
A fan nominated Sadie's Sherlock Holmes story, A Master of Magic, for a Featured Article at Fanlore. https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fanlore:Featured_Article_Nominations#A_Master_of_Magic
I added some context to the page yesterday about the prompt she had been working from and some brief descriptions about some other short stories she wrote.
Then I did some sleuthing about Sadie herself. https://fanlore.org/wiki/User:Mrs._Potato_Head#Sadie_Shaw
Your post about Sadie's story last July is what spurned it!
Oh my goodness that's incredible!! I love the thorough research you did on Sadie as well. It's so sweet that we know she got to travel to England and move there. Thanks for putting this information out there and letting me know!
Highly recommend everyone checks out the Fanlore article plus the research into Sadie!
(The original post for context)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Was just reading Richard Lancelyn Green's The Uncollected Sherlock Holmes and he makes a really good point in the introduction that I hadn't thought about in quite this way- that the Golden Age of detective fiction, in all its variety, was kick-started in the early 20c by a bunch of writers (EC Bentley, Baroness Orczy, Agatha Christie, etc) reacting to Sherlock Holmes by creating detectives who were as different from him as it was possible to be.
I find it a really interesting thought (and I'm sure there are other writers who can be said to have done the same, though Green doesn't mention them)- the idea that a very varied and creative genre could spring from writers all being so influenced by one particular character that they wrote something as distinctive as possible from it. If Holmes's existence spurred creativity enough to give us the Old Man in the Corner and Poirot (I'll admit, I never really got into Trent's Last Case), not to mention the other varied detectives who would arrive over the coming decades, then that's a great legacy in its own right. To be fair, the cultural penetration of Holmes and ACD was so massive that it's almost impossible for subsequent writers not to have been influenced by the canon, but the idea of the reaction to him triggering this 1910s-30s flourishing of creativity does tickle me.
happy 221b day from me and my holmes stuffies! ft. the fabulous canon lamp shade my lovely and talented gf made me :)
“Watson was a woman?” By Rex Stout I will always love you