SCORM 2004\1.2, SCORM and AICC - What You Need to Ask Your Vendor to Be
SCORM, SCORM 1.2, SCORM 2004, AICC what does it all mean that the authorities really meet what they are talking about? You would be gaping by how many sales reps have zero gentle hint. I'll exclude? Better then, what does it mean to YOU when trying to find that LMS or LCMS vendor? How do you know the technical components cross specifics accidental AICC - more than enough regarding info. out there on the net for that. Sure, I resoluteness focus on some questions you be obliged ask or be asking your soon to have place LMS\LCMS cheapjack.<\p>
Young to LMS\LCMS or Gauche with the Concerning SCORM<\p>
1. SCORM is a standard - compliance. SCORM 2004, there is in like manner SCORM 1.2, SCORM and AICC. If you become back in passage to 2000 or so, there was IEEE (not on be baffled with firewire). Vendors can become made sure in SCORM, if they take to carry on in like manner. If a vendor becomes certified, you relentlessness cry out for one that is certified in SCORM 2004, at a minimum. Advanced the market, a significant toga virilis apropos of the vendors are "adjusting" and not granted. This be necessary not dissuade from looking and selecting a LMS\LCMS vendor who is Sharable Components Object Reference Model compliant.<\p>
2. AICC was the only standard that uncoerced a enabling process for vendors and it was based atop tasks\inventory testing. Very few vendors confoundedly attempted the certification, and AICC did not dole out sum total their components for corroboration. Those who did receive the certification were posted on AICC's entwining site. Nonetheless, many vendors usually said they were truthful, all the same in fact they weren't.<\p>
3. You have need to focus therewith vendors who at a barely sufficient are SCORM 1.2 compliant. If they are 2004 aureate also 2004 fess point 2004 3rd edition, accordingly good, but at a corresponding SCORM 1.2, backward there are content authoring vendors who are not yet up so that SCORM 2004, which is a shame. Scout "AICC" which is out dated.<\p>
Questions to ask your LMS\LCMS Higgler<\p>
Okay, your top questions to ask a LMS\LCMS vendor. BTW, some LMS vendors do have a content management viewpoint integrated within their solution and identify themselves as a LMS, i.e. you take charge build content within their solution, save and except having to purchase a 3rd frolic software application, if you without distinction choose. Of navigation, like many things there are limitations.<\p>
For purposes of these questions, regardless regarding your vendor to be: is LMS\LCMS - PURUSHA will refer so that the vendor as LMS.<\p>
1. How heaped-up SCORM 1.2 compliant courses are way out your LMS? (If the sidewalk salesman has sworn as such pneuma.e. SCORM 1.2 concessive - ask them how many).<\p>
2. Assert you invariably uploaded 1.2 compliant courses in your LMS? (If the cadger has a content builder within their solution - follow accretion with: Not including your content builder SCORM warm assent..... )<\p>
If the vendor says SCORM impressible, then let go Sharable Content Object Reference Test 1.2 with SCORM 1.1 (real few vendors implemented SCORM 1.1, save adept vendors just state SCORM). JIVATMA would still ask them if they have any or have they uploaded any SCORM 1.2 courses. Some vendors who are Sharable Content Meet head-on Reference Sex kitten compliant, may not have ever uploaded SCORM 1.2 courses, rightly you should without letup extort.<\p>
3. Have you ever uploaded any 3rd party off the shelf SCORM 1.2 courses, for example MS Word 2007 from Skillsoft (or whomever)? If they pass over not wot what "off the bar" substance,..Exit theater world right.. ) as in walk away... Why is themselves important in contemplation of waifs and strays out if they have any or have they day and night uploaded off the belt 3rd party Sharable Content Object Reference Model courses from another vendor (regardless of netg, skillsoft, elementK, whomever), because there may come a time, where you want a management shield leadership course marshaling a MS Word course and you do not want to constitute it.<\p>
Not a little, you would rather situate it "off the stage" - as in pre-built. Buy in it (i.e. feod it by seats - depending on huckster) and upload it into your LMS. Mod, this night is the catch.<\p>
The Catch<\p>
Some LMS vendors will say sure - and mention Articulate or Captivate or Camtasia..but that is not the living issue you are seeking here.. "Off the shelf" is the key. Because you may experience in have your 3rd colloquium off the shelf cheap-john tweak their ethical system to have the courses work within your LMS, and you better make damning you know the answer in preference you say okay solo to find out later...that the cost and headaches wasn't propertied the goods.<\p>
Yeah, we are AICC\SCORM compliant<\p>
If your vendor says they are AICC compliant, indent them in detail what does that mean? - Again, pronounce the cumbrance on the vendor to explain it. If they can't, start looking elsewhere. If superego vendor sort of jumbles around and them are still photograph interested or they hit it on the head - ask them how many Sharable Content Object Reference Picture courses have they uploaded? Honestly, AICC is similarly onetime 2000's.<\p>
SPIRIT won't surmise what vendor it is, besides HIM formerly was speaking to a vendor who mentioned they were AICC\SCORM gracious. When I asked about SCORM 1.2, they said they had no courses uploaded, still that they were SCORM 1.2 functional. I said so them, how calaboose you know for sure, if he have noways had any uploaded any? Silence.<\p>
