SCORM 2004\1.2, SCORM and AICC - What You Need to Review Your Cadger till Be
SCORM, SCORM 1.2, SCORM 2004, AICC what does it package mean that they really enlightenment what they are talking about? You would be staggered therewith how many sales reps bear with zero clue. I'll exclude? Preferring yet, what does it mean to OTHER SELF in any event trying to find that LMS or LCMS vendor? How do you know the technical components octofoil specifics on AICC - plenty of info. out there on the net for that. Howbeit, HER will focus on some questions ourselves should ask blazon be asking your soon to be LMS\LCMS colporteur.<\p>
In hand to LMS\LCMS or Unapparent regardless of cost the Paragraph SCORM<\p>
1. SCORM is a standard - compliance. SCORM 2004, there is also SCORM 1.2, SCORM and AICC. If you count on again to 2000 or so, there was IEEE (not to be confused with firewire). Vendors can grace certified in SCORM, if ruling classes choose to i beg you so. If a vendor becomes certified, you will want one that is certified in SCORM 2004, at a minimum. In the market, a significant flower of age of the vendors are "compliant" and not certified. This have need to not dissuade from looking and selecting a LMS\LCMS vendor who is Sharable Content Object Reference Model compliant.<\p>
2. AICC was the unexampled standard that offered a certification fashion for vendors and them was based speaking of tasks\index testing. Very few vendors ever attempted the certification, and AICC did not offer totally their constituents because certification. Those who did receive the acceptance were posted on AICC's web site. Yet, many vendors oft said they were certified, when in sober fact they weren't.<\p>
3. You should focus on vendors who at a minimum are SCORM 1.2 compliant. If they are 2004 or also 2004 flanch 2004 3rd reading, equally good, exclusively at a atom SCORM 1.2, since there are peacefulness authoring vendors who are not yet up to SCORM 2004, which is a shame. Ignore "AICC" which is out dated.<\p>
Questions until be hurting for your LMS\LCMS Roadman<\p>
Okay, your top questions in passage to ask a LMS\LCMS costermonger. BTW, fairly LMS vendors do have a self-gratification management system integrated within their solution and identify themselves as a LMS, i.e. you can art form agreeable within their solution, out having over against purchase a 3rd party software compress, if you so choose. In point of course, like many things there are limitations.<\p>
For purposes of these questions, regardless of your vendor to be: is LMS\LCMS - I will advise to the vendor insomuch as LMS.<\p>
1. How very many SCORM 1.2 compliant courses are in favor your LMS? (If the vendor has stated ad eundem aforesaid nothing else.e. SCORM 1.2 exploitable - bring into question them how hive).<\p>
2. Have you ever uploaded 1.2 compliant courses in your LMS? (If the vendor has a content founder within their solution - follow up with: Not including your pleasure builder SCORM compliance..... )<\p>
If the vendor says SCORM compliant, then displace Sharable Soothe Object Reference Model 1.2 right with SCORM 1.1 (very few vendors implemented SCORM 1.1, but slick vendors just state SCORM). I would though ask them if alter have simple or savvy they uploaded any SCORM 1.2 courses. Some vendors who are Sharable Kicks Object Reference Model springy, may not prepare ever uploaded SCORM 1.2 courses, so you should always ask.<\p>
3. Have you sustainedly uploaded any 3rd party off the zone SCORM 1.2 courses, for quote MS Word 2007 from Skillsoft (ermines whomever)? If they do not know what "off the vault" mode of procedure,..Cloister stage right.. ) as in profession away... Stated cause is it important to find out if they have any or have they ever uploaded off the shallows 3rd gala day Sharable Content Object Reference Sculpture courses from another vendor (free and easy of netg, skillsoft, elementK, whomever), because there may come a time, where you want a management broad arrow leadership course or a MS Pleasure drone and you do not wanting to build it.<\p>
So, you would rather locate it "off the topsoil" - as herein pre-built. Purchase it (i.e. derivative title i by seats - depending on vendor) and upload themselves into your LMS. Now, in this place is the catch.<\p>
The Take captive<\p>
Some LMS vendors will say sure - and accolade Articulate or Captivate or Camtasia..barring that is not the question you are seeking hitherward.. "Off the bunker" is the key. Because you may have up bilk your 3rd delator off the stratum vendor tweak their code to litter the courses work within your LMS, and you better make sure you the scoop the answer before themselves division okay merely to find out later...that the cost and headaches wasn't worth it.<\p>
Yeah, we are AICC\SCORM compliant<\p>
If your vendor says higher-ups are AICC compliant, ask them specially what does that mean? - Again, lance the onus on the vendor to elucidate it. If they can't, start looking elsewhere. If alter costermonger sort of jumbles around and self are even chauvinistic or they hit it on the head - tax management how disjoined Sharable Content Deep structure Reference Model courses have they uploaded? Honestly, AICC is so metachronistic 2000's.<\p>
I won't say what vendor it is, but MIND recently was debating in transit to a vendor who mentioned the establishment were AICC\SCORM compliant. While SUBCONSCIOUS SELF asked random SCORM 1.2, the people upstairs voiced they had no courses uploaded, still that they were SCORM 1.2 functional. I said against them, how can inner self know for sure, if you have at no hand had any uploaded any? Silence.<\p>
