#seeking

As artificial intelligence cements its role across more U.S. job sectors, career training experts say the technology is actually reviving the need for liberal arts skills and diminishing the need for more traditional technical skills. CBS News MoneyWatch reporter Megan Cerullo has more. Source link

~ Islamiyatsb

Seeking is not a calm activity. It is tension. A gap trying to close itself.

Neurologically and psychologically, searching often operates like hunger. The brain detects incompleteness, uncertainty, contradiction, lack of orientation, or threatened identity, and mobilizes attention toward resolution. Curiosity and anxiety are deeply linked. The organism wants cognitive closure because unresolved uncertainty consumes energy and destabilizes prediction.

This is why metaphysical seeking can become addictive. Every answer gives temporary relief, but then new uncertainty appears. The mind starts looping.

“What am I?” “What is reality?” “What happens after death?” “What is enlightenment?” “What is the meaning?”

The organism imagines that one final answer will finally end the agitation. But often the agitation itself is generating the questions. The seeking machinery survives by producing new lack. This is why some Buddhist traditions saw craving itself, not merely objects of craving, as the deeper issue. The mind does not only desire food, sex, status, or certainty. It structurally operates through reaching. Through becoming. Through “not yet.” Through not enough.

And modern spirituality often secretly intensifies this mechanism instead of dissolving it. The seeker becomes spiritually ambitious.

More awareness. More awakening. More transcendence. More purity. More truth.

The ego converts enlightenment into another acquisition project. Seeking and wanting are like bodily hunger because both involve predictive systems trying to restore equilibrium. A hungry body seeks food. An existentially destabilized mind seeks orientation. The subjective feeling is agitation moving toward imagined completion. The irony is that some questions may not possess the kind of closure the organism wants. So the seeking continues indefinitely, feeding itself.

This is why stopping can feel strangely relieving. Not because reality has been solved, but because the compulsive demand for final resolution loosens. The nervous system temporarily exits the loop of “something essential is missing.” But there is an important nuance. Humans cannot completely stop seeking. Life itself involves movement, curiosity, adaptation, questioning, and desire. Total absence of seeking would resemble death, severe depression, or catatonia. The issue is not seeking as such, but the fantasy that ultimate existential completion lies one more answer away.

With wanting, suffering increases. Insatiability is like leprosy.

This is the moment where many traditions become confused. They take moments of ego-softening, silence, boundary dissolution, or cognitive quiet and inflate them into metaphysical omniscience. The experience may be real while the interpretation becomes grandiose. The paradox is that the human mind craves transcendence precisely because it experiences limitation. But the craving itself may be structurally endless. The ego wants escape from being a finite organism. Spirituality often becomes the continuation of ego by subtler means.

“I will become infinite.” “I will awaken.” “I will transcend suffering.” “I will merge with ultimate reality.”

The “I” survives by trying to become cosmic and immortal. The soul in Christianity is nothing more than a personal 'I'. I understand the death of the body, but... the soul...

So yes, there is wisdom in stopping the compulsive hunt for final metaphysical completion. Not because one has discovered ultimate truth, but because one recognizes the machinery of endless psychological reaching. But one should also avoid another trap, which is turning disillusionment itself into a frozen doctrine. “Nothing is possible, everything is meaningless, all seeking is stupid.” That too can become another identity structure, another final answer.