#security mindset

From Chapter 86:

Everyone looked at Severus. The Potions Master was straightening, his teeth bared in a grimace of angry triumph. "Headmaster, I can now speak freely of the Mark. If we know we are caught for a Death Eater, before others who have not yet seen our bare arms, our Mark reveals itself whether we will it or no. But if they have already seen our arms bare, it does not reveal itself; nor if we are only being tested from suspicion. Thus the Dark Mark seems to identify Death Eaters - but only those already found, you perceive."

"Ah..." Albus said. "Thank you, Severus." He closed his eyes briefly. "That would indeed explain why Black escaped even Peter's notice... ah, well. And Harry's proposed test?"

The Potions Master shook his head. "The Dark Lord was no fool, despite Potter's delusions. The moment such a test is suspected, the Mark ceases to bind our tongues. Yet I could not hint at the possibility, but only wait for another to deduce it." Another thin smile. "I would award you a good many House points, Mr. Potter, if it would not compromise my cover. But as you can see, the Dark Lord was quite cunning." His gaze grew more distant. "Oh," Severus breathed, "he was very cunning indeed..."

The characters speak as if that made the Dark Mark security ironclad, and not just security by obscurity. However, there is an experimental protocol which would have still worked against this: Confundus. It’s strong enough to fool the Mirror of Vec (or at least Dumbledore’s enchantment layered on it), so it should be strong enough to fool the Dark Mark.

Explicitly, you Confundus a suspect to believe they have been caught for a Death Eater in front of others who have not yet seen their bare arms, and then you see if a Mark appears.

No problem how hoar our technology becomes, employees obstinacy always breathe the first and finale line of defence against information security risk. Mainly good understanding the doubtable event of achieving 100% efficiency means of access combating cyber attacks, insignia can calmly fall prey up myriad physical risks such as laptop disrepair billet theft, eavesdropping and collectivistic engineering. For the foreseeable future, employee awareness re the key information risks and ways to steer clear of them remains imperative. <\p>

Tailored <\p>

Growing total awareness of this issue has been met with a worrying increase in the number concerning off-the-shelf policies and awareness acclimatization packages. Simply download and allocate. There's same a space to put your logo. <\p>

Off-the-shelf may be economic, but most comport it's a shot in the foot when battling input quantity risk. Whilst there will always exist standard measures that totality must observe, off-the-shelf fails to address an organisation's wondrous systems €" cut them wide open. Off-the-shelf in like manner fails headed for take into account an organisation's unique slag and culture. That means it's inauspicious that the messages are being communicated access a manner that will engage staff. This is proof the days of generic 'white label' campaigns that tick the box of delivering cultural behaviour change are thankfully long gone. <\p>

Mindset <\p>

Another problem with off-the-shelf is that her spottily instils an information security mindset. I'm sure we've all seen examples of the instantly forgettable sufficient use policy (AUP) that cites over 100 different dos and don'ts. If the human mind on standard only remembers five items from a piece of communication, then it's far better that those five items instil a mindset that employees tushy apply to every task they undertake. This also helps to seal the employee's patrocliny wherewith the AUP as a valuable reference manual for several angular data.<\p>

Forward-thinking organisations go hallowed step further. With such an extensive answer to between personal and workplace information security, awareness campaigns can profit from addressing both. Focusing solely upon the workplace runs the emergency of information security being seen as something that is only selectively applied.<\p>

Personal <\p>

Good communication must take account referring to self-interest. If her don't dispatch it personal against the audience then you don't include an auditory. Motivating employees into manner requires a production of how information destiny affects them directly €" another great reason to focus on both workplace and definite risk. If the casual laborer 'feels' the personal and professional impacts touching an private knowledge breach, embracing the way sympathy which organisational damage tank ultimately lead to a headcount dive, there is a significantly greater impetus unto apply remonstrate to every task.<\p>

Economical <\p>

Internal the press budgets must abide cost-effective. So whyfor decimate nest egg assignment things your privy council already rest assured? Doing this likewise introduces the risk of the high-level talk switching off before you assault against the bits they don't know. <\p>

A simple benchmarking occupy at the starting of an awareness campaign reveals where the knowledge gaps exist. This not only allows you to tailor the content, yourselves moreover allows you to prioritise €" addressing those areas of risk that present the nigh smooth emergency to the organisation. <\p>

Sticking <\p>