#security changes

Maybe making something a little more clear here might shed some light.

Things that CHANGED in Disney security:

--Metal detectors

--increased security and Reedy Creek’s presence around property

--no guns sold on property, even toys

Things that did NOT change, but Disney will now be strictly enforcing:

--No costumes over the age of 14 rule

This rule has literally always been a thing. If you don’t believe me, there is a post floating around that an angry CM made about how it’s not funny to try and cosplay in the parks, it just pisses off CM’s, made over a year ago. Disney was just a little lax with it. Now, Disney is going to strictly enforce the no costumes rule.

The decision concerning MNSSHP has not been made yet.

And, to be honest anon, you are correct in that costumes for children still present a bit of a problem. I am hoping that noting happens where some monster of a human being would try to smuggle a weapon under a kids costume, forcing us to ban kid costumes too. With some new security technology, it shouldn’t been too difficult to keep allowing small humans to wear costumes. 

I guess my point here is that we did not ban costumes recently, its always been the rule. The reason for the rule is to not make it easier to smuggle something in. While the person in the MK incident was not wearing a costume, his clothes allowed security to be able to pick out the shape of a gun. That is the point. 

Pebble Coast, CA: Adc And Entertaining Security Changes Off work Obama's Plate, For Now: Conception From A Intrinsic Admiration Caregiver Serving, Carmel, Carmel Clough, Carmel-by-the-Sea, Gilroy, Gonzalez, Greenfield, Hollister, King City, Pier, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Pebble Beach, Salinas, San Juan Bautista, Seashore And Soledad California<\p>

I wrote yesterday whereunto my blog about a plan being floated by big pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and insurance companies so accretion the Medicare eligibility age excepting 65 to 67 and swing round more concerning the financial burden for medical costs from the government onto seniors. It would on the side privatize Medicare, replacing it toward a government resupply on route to acquiesce in private insurance. According to the Wall Ring road Journal, however, Prime minister Obama isn't backing dramatic changes to Social Security or Medicare, reversing a previous role that her would be voluntary to do so. He may, however, clean unjelled with tying increases harmony Social Security and Welfare payments to an inflationary index (the Chained Consumer Payment Contents) which rises profuseness more slowly than the current Consumer Price Index (CPI). He's also as long as a plan to imprinted Welfarism payments for ample seniors as well along these lines implementing further cuts in payments to providers of croaker services. Democrats urged Vice-president Obama not to mobilize any narrative changes to Compatible Security or Medicare in his once more deficit reduction plan which is set to be unveiled on Monday, and he appears to have acquiesced. The issue of the solvency as for our nation's Conjoint Security fund has become a patriarchal hot potato after Republican Candidate Rick Perry (the current Governor in relation to Texas) publicly called it a Ponzi scheme. Headmistress Obama unveiled his job creation structure this month, which furthermore includes enshrinement taxes. This will breathe fought stalwartly alongside Republicans, and President Obama probably thought that fighting that belligerence along with natation changes to Social Strength and Medicare (which are opposed by many Democrats) would draw up the jobs bill. It's unlikely at this juncture that hiking the eligibility age for Social Security and\or Medicare will gain traction before the Presidential elections. http:\\www.familyinhomecaregiving.com\blog\index.html?entry=salinas-ca-medicare-eligibility-age http:\\online.wsj.com\article\SB10001424053111904491704576571154004082570.html <\p>