#rtcay

I know this exactly.

I was always giving 1 and 2 on these threads to the people who posted their generic dog characters. You know, the ones that are a full solid colour, but oh, just maybe have a star on their ass to make them “unique?” Yeah, people didn’t like that. So I always got low ratings on my characters. Some of mine from that time weren’t really that great either, but some were, and on those ones I used to get the comments of “just because” or some shit with it. Making an obvious jab that they were saying “Enjoy your low rating because you’re a dick” without actually saying that.

I also used to gives zeros especially when I really did not like the characters, but I couldn’t do that either. But fuck it, I did anyway.

Those types of threads are just meant to be circle jerks where no rating will ever be below five.

When I used to post on the RTCAY thread, I was always rude, but heh, never like this. Nor was I this stupid with what I say.

Any colour combination can be considered common, and there’s really nothing wrong with them honestly. Colour combination rarity doesn’t determine if it looks good.

A simple design is too complex? What, are they into the whole: Character is a solid colour with a different solid colour for an underbelly? Because those starter designs have nothing to them. [No offense guys, they’re just the plainest of plain and you can’t get anymore boring than that.]

I can understand about the story part though, I never really care to read them and I don’t really care much for them. Last I checked, there was nothing stating you had to include one, read one, or reflect back on one in your response, so I never bother with them. But you know, you don’t have to just go and say it directly to the person.

Airbrushed though? Any strictly airbrushed character gets a -50/10 by default.