#rm situation

I've said this on another blog: but many are angelkin for reasons that are not tied to religion. Stop marking us as "religious" when we are not.

If you can respect Godkin and Divinekin as non-religious, you can do so with Angelkin.

I am Angelkin and I'm not part of Christianity or any kind of organized religion.

Please do not mark my posts that say "This term is not inherently religious" as "Theme: Religion" or "CW Religion" because it is not.

Thank you for your apology. I wholly accept it.

I also want to apologize to you for reblogging Lament's post, as that's kind of what started the spiral more than anything. I also want to apologize for pointing out the post I felt bullied by. Even though it's perfectly fine I felt hurt by the post you reblogged, I shouldn't have pointed it out so specifically. I should have just kept it vague. I also apologize for reawakening the discourse on your blog, which likely resulted in a lot of your followers who held a grudge from the last time this went down attacking you as well.

I will say, and this is absolutely nothing against you, but I have trouble with forgiving people due to it being used as an abuse tactic. So to keep my paranoia from overwhelming me, I'm going to keep your archive blog blocked just a little bit longer (until my delusions die down). When my paranoia has mostly subsided, I'll probably unblock your RM blog and let you know, if that sounds acceptable to you.

I'm hesitant to forgive, but I don't think you were trying to be malicious. I'll try to work through on forgiving you. And also, you're not obligated to forgive me either, I was also wrong in this situation. The least I can do is apologize.

Thank you so much anon. It is genuinely, GENUINELY infuriating to constantly be lumped in with something that just.. Does not hold good memories for me.

Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be stopping any time soon...

- @anonymous-archiver

Oh no, it's perfectly acceptable in that case!!

If you are an archival blog that wants to respect my wishes and boundaries and add an extra layer of archival, I'm wholly welcoming of it!

I'm just a bit scared since the RM situation that if I tag archival blogs, people might act like I'm forcing people to archive my terms (which they aren't forced to!). Overall, the RM situation has me super wary of a lot of things because of the flock of parasocial supporters that came after me (which don't blame RM for!).

WHOA. SIMMER DOWN THERE ANON.

Seriously though, I do agree somewhat. That was super out of line of them. I wish I could say I was surprised, but... I'm really not. And none of you better go after RM for parasocial followers, because RM has stated it doesn't want people sending me asks like that.

non-religious out of spite?

for when one experiences something typically seen as religious in a non-religious way out of spite!

could also do reclaimed non-religious, for when one is something that is seen as religious in a non-religious way because they are reclaiming it !

Ohhh, I like this idea! I can definitely do reclaimed non-religious, that is absolutely something I would love to coin!

Religious out of spite can go to someone else there, mainly because I just don't want to be spiteful.

Stop disrespecting RM's wishes. It has asked you to stop fighting for it. Quit being parasocial.

RM does not have to have my terms on its blog. It is not forced to reblog things that trigger it. I am not forcing it to put my terms on its blog. Your argument is invalid.