#request processing

Two questions from a write-in standpoint:

Are you alright with references to sensual experiences or would you rather I write this asexual/no potentially sexual references? Namely one half-humorous half-flirt related to the cuffs and what could be done with them (only vague allusion).

And are you alright with references to marriage (not necessarily meant romantically in my mind, up to you) in the sense of the chained rings? Namely ending in a potential future proposal/thoughts of life together in an ambiguous open-ending.

This is more of a replacement question than an issue with writing about cuffs, but have you seen this by any chance? And if you like it, shall I write with chained rings instead of cuffs? Just something I was reminded of and wanted you to consider.

Also, please clarify what you mean by the other having concern about the solution - Is it genuine concern because of the image of it? Is it humorous-concern about the ridiculousness of it? Or something else? I don't have a clear image of what emotions are being experienced.

Also, since nothing further has been specified, I default to a gender neutral couple.

I guess my only clarifying question would be this: how exactly do you see the knitted version of them? Do you just see it as a comforting inanimate object like one would with a person's hoodie with their scent, a gift from them, etc.? Or do you consider it as a version/something of them that you can 'actually hug' when you need it?

Because that is different and problematic territory. If you're just looking for a way to have a version of someone (fictional or not) that is without that boundary, then you can imagine why I won't write that. There is no 'escaping' someone's boundary. If you just think of it as an object without any aspect of their personhood relating to it, then I may reconsider the request.