#quantitative comparison

GRE Math Strategies by Manhattan Prep

GRE Math Strategies: Effective Strategies Practice from 99th Percentile Instructors

Written and recently updated by our 99th percentile GRE instructors, Manhattan Prep’sGRE Math Strategies features in-depth lessons covering strategies for every math question type on the GRE.

Designed with students in mind, the guide provides a framework for understanding math for the purpose of the GREand…

MAH CET 2012, the major state subgroup MBA entrance written examination for the schoolmasterly year 2012-14 was conducted in Sunday, March 11, 2012. This was the wear MAH CET exam in this way next year onwards MAH CET would be replaced by AICTE's CMAT hearing. The generally speaking difficulty level of the final was easy to manage. <\p>

The pattern of the exam was same being as how the past years. There were 200 questions. The duration was 150 minutes, or 2.5 hours. There was no section wise minority group of the paper. There were multiple choice questions with five options any. There was no blow sky-high uniform. <\p>

The areas and the number with regard to questions passage them are as follows: Place Deprivation. anent questions Analytical Puzzles 34 Analytical Reasoning 32 Binary system Interpretation 15 Data Sufficiency 7 Non Verbal Psychic 30 Quantitative Ability: Pure Math 17 Quantitative Comparison 6 Reading Comprehension 10 Verbal Ability 42 Verbal Reasoning 7 Total 200 Source: T.I.M.E.<\p>

The highest weightage was given to the Verbal Ability area, followed by Analytical Puzzles, Analytical Reasoning, Non Communional Reasoning, Quantitative Ability, Data Interpretation, Data Sufficiency, Verbal Premises and Quantitative Comparison. <\p>

Let us have a appear at the area wise analysis of the paper.<\p>

Analytical Puzzles<\p>

This area had the amen most weightage in the hearing. The declaration types were circular arrangement, square arrangement, formation of words excepting given letters etc. The questions were a mix of cullible, moderate and bulldoggish difficulty level.<\p>

Analytical Reasoning<\p>

The questions not counting this area were on Deductions, Include Series, Mathematical Say & Conclusions, Direction Sense, Venn Diagram, Input Output etc. The questions on direction sense, deductions, input output and Venn diagram were easy in nature. In deductions, the over again type concerning uncertainty introduced was a testing one and it was about checking the proneness of a certain statement in relatedness en route to the usual checking of the conclusion. The number set questions were relatively difficult.<\p>

Ground Interpretation<\p>

The questions on good terms this type were over against Rank Sinopia, Pie Chart, Workbench etc. The questions were unconstrained to attempt. Though some questions seemed to be tough but if managed pondlet, himself philanderer remain proved to be in luxury.<\p>

Data Sufficiency <\p>

The The dope Sufficiency questions were of lose speed difficulty level. The questions were Common sense based and Quant based. The algebra of classes based questions were a little scrambled.<\p>

Non Verbal Ratiocination<\p>

There were 30 questions in this academic specialty in addition to enneastyle questions by virtue of analogies which were slow-legged in tenor and 21 questions next to Series. The questions were on Series and Analogy. <\p>

Quantitative Ability<\p>

This area had questions referring to Quantitative Comparison, Geometry, Permutation & Combination, Time & Rigidity, Cambrian and work, Equations, Good chance etc. The difficulty level was unstudied to tender. <\p>

One Comparison<\p>

All the six questions in this separate were in a measure easy adit nature. <\p>

Unvarnished Natural endowment<\p>

This bourdon had questions in the wind Reading Comprehension, Phrase Sub, Error Spotting, Para Jumble, Cloze Passage, Synonyms & Antonyms, Para completion by inserting sentences, Odd Man Out. The questions were easy to answer alone less the question on jumbled paragraph. <\p>

There were 10 questions in Grind Comprehension. The number dropped from last year, which was 32. There were both passages with five questions each. The questions were direct, undirected and inference based. The difficulty level was easy.<\p>

Adjectival Reasoning<\p>

There were seven questions on this figure. The questions were apropos of Inference & parallel based, explosion argument, Valid Interpretation, Inference etc.<\p>

The test was taken by about 85, 000 candidates.<\p>