I'm not sure why these attacks are different from the others. Let me back up. For those of you who don't have family in places other than the States and certain areas of Europe terrorism might be something that you read in papers or hear sound bites of on CNN, NPR, etc. You shake your head at the state of the world; we all do. It's hard to understand, even as a student of politics. This is not to imply that as people, humans, we don't all feel pain and fear when we hear about these events. But, aside from the tremendous tragedy of 9-11, terrorism seems to be something that's 'out there'. For me and most Indians(for that matter, Easter Europeans, Israelis, Palestinians, people all over different countries in Africa, Indonesia, Thailand, the list goes on) it's definitely not.
My initial statement was regarding the attacks in Mumbai this week. Why is it different to me than the attacks in Delhi last summer or indeed attacks anywhere in India the years previous? Perhaps with Delhi, I knew that most of my family was safe, as they live in the suburbs (I use the word 'safe' loosely here, last year the attacks were in marketplaces that my friends and family frequent). I guess the fact that Purwa was stuck in a restaurant right next to the Taj Mahal Hotel, where the initial bombings took place, had something to do with it. Hearing her voice over my mobile, worried but strong, small but steady, hit me harder than I expected it to. I was very worried about my friend, someone I've been close to since high school and regard as a sister. She's still not entirely safe (though now at home), which is why this attack might be different from the others. I'm not sure, but what is of a deeper concern is the jaded nature I might have fallen into when it comes to these security issues. It's easier to look away, flip the channel, navigate away from the web page, etc. It's much harder to ignore the material reality of someone I love in danger.
[images from ny times]