#purpledemonlilyposting

She’s also ableist as fuck too, she uses the r slur on the regular to insult others and has stated that it’s not actually a slur, meanwhile she thinks that because she doesn’t like the word ‘queer’ it should be a slur no one can reclaim.

Sai is racist, she’s queerphobic, and she’s ableist. And she also has defended Black Gryph0n in the past, claiming his relationship with his wife, Claire, is not grooming. She was so adamant about this that she got banned from the YouTube drama subreddit because she wouldn’t stop defending him and being a cunt.

This kind of behaviour, sprouting hateful ignorant garbage, isn’t new, Sai has always been like this! It’s just that she’s used Lily Orchard, who is indeed a horrible fucking person, as a way to hide it. Her coverage of Lily focuses on her media takes instead of her actual crimes, her purpledemonlilyposting account exists not to spread awareness of the fact that Lily is an abusive person, but rather to clown on her media takes.

So can we stop treating her like she’s a good person? Can we please start holding her accountable for her actions instead of letting her hide behind Lily Orchard or her status as a lesbian?

Did it take you 11 days to check your mentions?

What was 11 days ago mayhaps, a comedy holiday of some sort

Why haven't you told youtube you ain't interested in seeing mentions from sai or do you like being kept in the know when she posts

Perhaps I ought to preface this with a clarifying remark: user @Saiscribbles also known as @PurpleDemonLilyPosting MAY be a malicious liar, however there are also other alternatives that they may be instead which shall be elaborated on within.

To begin, this user has initially come forward with a very serious claim: They have received direct messaging from a now-deleted user "l4ffyp1n3" containing racially motivated hate speech.

As seen above, rather immediately, with no further investigation, user purpledemonlilyposting set the blame upon user Taffer.

Their rationale?

Said message incorporated the usage of text-based emoticons, and that's it. No further evidence is forthcoming aside from the use of emoticons.

I ought not have to discuss the reasoning as to why this excuse is as insubstantial and deficient as it is, but nevertheless I shall do so:

The usage of text-based emoticons is not exclusive to one individual

The usage of text-based emoticons is easily replicated

Both points are significant enough to cast serious doubt onto the claims without further investigation. Given that no other evidence was provided by this user, it should immediately raise red flags regarding their poor (absent) use of irrefutable evidence in order to make a serious allegation.

Indeed, user Taffer has also stated in a now-deleted post that they acknowledge it could have even been sent by user purpledemonlilyposting, however due to the lack of evidence they chose not to make that assumption.

User Taffer has also immediately denied the usage of such derogatory vocabulary, stating that they do not use hate speech.

At this surface-level evidence, there is naught that can be confidently claimed to either side. The ghastly lack of actual evidence provided by Saiscribbles is apparent, and we now have the word of another that it is naught but libelous misattribution.

With the inability to seek out in-depth information on this deleted account responsible for the hate-messages, as well as the inability to reach out and converse with this user in person, we are left with one last option to assess the most likely truth: Seeking patterns of behavior.

Upon an in-depth analysis of all of the posts created by user Taffer, the usage of derogatory hate speech has been documented a total of 0 times.

Across any known accounts, there has been not a single instance of racially driven hate speech of any form, nor speech that derides the disabled, religious, or disabled.

To prove a negative is a rather daunting task, so all who are skeptical of this claim are welcome to verify it for themselves. There has been no case of hate-speech utilized anywhere.

From this, we can conclude that the sudden usage of hate-speech would appear far out-of-character, and text-based emoticons aside, would greatly imply with a higher degree of confidence that the user who has sent race-based hate speech is not the same individual as user Taffer.

However, we are also able to assess the speech patterns of the individual who started to make such bold claims in the first place.

Usage of the n-word

Usage of the n-word

Usage of a racially coded slur

Usage of multiple race-based slurs

Usage of a racially coded slur

Usage of a mental disability-based slur

As we can see from the above evidence, user SaiScribbles, also known as Purpledemonlilyposting, has a much more significant history of using derogatory language towards others. Such evidence has been documented by many individuals and many of these messages are presently located on their Twitter account and are easily verifiable.

From this, the pattern of behavior far more greatly leans in favor of this user being the individual to message themselves and others with the race-based hate speech.

In addition, we see the usage of text-based emoticons. Not unlike what was used in the inflammatory messages in question. Despite their only claim being that user Taffer was responsible due to the utilization of emoticons, it appears user Saiscribbles is also just as capable and willing to utilize such.

However, I am not here to point the finger at user Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting as the one who is responsible for the act.

While the pattern of behavior is significantly in favor of them being more likely to utilize the derogatory language as opposed to user Taffer, we still must accept the reality of the matter that is we do not have sufficient information to state conclusively who is responsible for the hate-speech messaged to different users.

This leads me to my ultimate conclusion on the probable malice of user Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting:

Based on the information provided, we can confidently rule out user Taffer as the individual responsible for the hate-speech. The evidence presented is definitively lacking any substance that cannot be easily replicated by any other individual, and the stated pattern of behavior which is also verifiable by others does not correlate to the actions taken by the now deleted "l4ffyp1n3".

And yet despite this, user Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting has, with regularity, pushed forward the narrative that user Taffer was the individual responsible for the messages.

We can thus conclude one of the following possibilities:

User Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting is woefully ignorant of how to interpret information and draw any meaningful and unbiased analysis from any evidence presented.

User Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting is deeply ignorant of how to interpret patterns of behavior but chooses to utilize a flimsy argument regardless in order to push a narrative that allows them to target the character of a critic of theirs.

User Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting understands how feeble of an argument they presented happens to be and chooses to weaponize it anyways in an effort to maliciously target the character of their critic.

User Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting is fully aware that the source of the hate-speech is a different individual and chooses to place the blame on user Taffer regardless, as it allows them a chance to target their character and discredit them.

User Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting is responsible for the hate-speech in question and is deliberately forcing a libelous narrative to deride and attack the character of their critic.

Each of these scenarios, based on the pattern of their speech alone, is significantly more likely than their own initial claim they continue to present as fact to this day.

As for which of these conclusions is the correct one, none but they can say for certain. I would certainly hope that it is a case of egregious ignorance and lack of understanding of how to read speech patterns and investigate matters prior to making a serious allegation.

Such a conclusion would be humiliating to admit to as an adult, but far better than the alternative of planned and intentional malice.

Given the available information on this matter, regardless of the intent, user Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting is a liar, and cannot be trusted to be speaking the truth in any authority on this matter, as their "evidence" can hardly be considered as such, substandard and effectively nonexistent as it is. Rather, it is akin to a schoolyard gossip mill, deliberately inciting hatred and violence towards one individual for no reason other than to isolate, intimidate, and harass another.

There is no evidence of user Taffer being one to use hate-speech, and an overabundance of evidence showing user Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting far more likely and willing to do so instead.

On this matter, Saiscribbles/Purpledemonlilyposting is a liar, and their word should be discredited.

Do not believe them on this matter.

@purpledemonlilyposting is this her vague posting about dragons age again?

She’s claiming he’s being a misogynist and doing everything she can to make people look away from how hateful and phobic she is towards literally every group. She’s old and sad and I don’t think she knows what friendship is, she refuses to learn more about the world.

And what’s extra sad is that, while Sai loves Hazbin and Steven Universe, the creators of those things would hate her.

Viv and Rebecca are both queer, they’re both very accepting people from what I’ve seen, yes Viv isn’t a perfect person and the way she went about certain things with Al was well intentioned but ultimately done poorly (the voodoo), but they’re both people that, had they not made something Sai loves, Sai would hate, and I don’t think they’d like her much either.

Sai’s crashing and burning, she’s trying to act like she’s untouchable and like she doesn’t care while frantically deleting all evidence that could make her seem worse and throwing fits that people are cutting her off. She’s focusing on Ant distancing himself not because she’s actually hurt, not because she genuinely thinks he’s misogynistic (at least I hope not) but because she probably thinks if she keeps it up, people will forget about the racism and queerphobia and the ableism.

That’s all her giant tantrum is amounting too, trying to change the subject. And I don’t like Ant, I don’t trust him, but Sai is infinitely worse and right now what we need to do is not let her slip away. What she wants is for us to fight with Ant and argue whether he was a bad friend or not, and what we need to do is keep focusing on Sai’s racism and queerphobia and ableism.

User SaiScribbles is, indeed, grotesquely racist.

I will amend my prior analysis: the likelihood of this user being the one, or in proximity to the one, to use heinous racial slurs is significantly higher. I would assume that they happily surround themselves with like-minded bigots who are all too happy to deflect from their own despicable views.

The veritable rancorous elderly buffoon who pushed the fabricated narrative of my friend being racist with naught more than the most watery and feeble apophenia did so knowingly and with intent to deflect from her own proclivity towards bigotry.

An idle musing only, but that so often the masses are made aware of her vitriolic diatribes in such a cyclical manner paints a remarkable pattern.