#probability wave

Geometry & Space-time

Understanding the Geometry:

When one thinks about gravity what one takes away is that it is convergent in character. It [tends to] draw(s) [mass] bodies together/closer.

Thinking about a funnel it takes fluid matterial from a greater space/volume containment to a smaller/lesser space/volume.

We think of space as being fully Euclidean 3D.

Imagine if a paper sheet factory made a mistake. That the sheet movers got slowly jammed up.

The front of the prospective sheet was virtually 2 dimensionally flat, but as the movement slowed the sheet got thicker and thicker with paper pulp until it was a 3D wedge shape on the other end.

If one traces from the 2D end to the 3D end one is going from lower dimension to higher dimension.

Conversely if one traces from the 3D end to the 2D end one is going from higher dimension to lower dimension.

On the 2D end there are less options on one's thickness position. On the 3D end there are more options on one's thickness position.

Going from 2D to 3D is divergent which means there is less predictiveness as our thickness position options increase.

Going from 3D to 2D the thickness options decrease [converge] which increases the degree of certainty/predictability.

This hypothetical universe in paper illustrates adding or subtracting a dimension,

It is non-Euclidean, non-orthogonol in character.

Gravity is convergent.

Gravity demonstrates a dimensional transition from higher [fully Euclidean 3D] to something less than fully 3D [ --->2.9 - 2.7 - 2.5 - 2.3…. D].

Probability Waves:

A mass field is radial/circular in configuration.

So the fact that probability waves get denser with the passage of time on the side closer to an external center of mass means the center of probability moves towards any external center of mass.

Mass's time-dilation is concentric in form.

Now think about a slice of pizza.

The shape of time-dilation around a center of mass is going to move the probability wave towards the sharp point of the pizza slice.

So the probability wave is shrinking along the longwise axis of the slice, but it is also shrinking crosswise as the slice gets narrower & narrower.

The probability wave occupies less space [& less time] as it gets closer to an external center of mass.

The probability wave is shrinking and moving towards lower dimensionality.

It is condensing, consolidating, converging [towards a point].

The physical shrinkage of space in a mass field is exactly proportional to the changes in the time speed there.

Very precise measuring will demonstrate it.

The Sun's interior [vs exterior] higher rotation speed is extant evidence of the fact.

I'm running low on steam & will terminate this diatribe,

In opening my blogging 'mouth' I have caused myself to think about what i said, only from a different perspective.

When i talked about my probability wave explanation of gravity i was thinking of a non-zero mass particle at rest in a time-dilation gradient.

In my imagination gravity imparts actual additional vector inertia, an actual energy exchange upon a mass particle/body as it is accelerated towards an external center of mass. [or conversely removes vector energy as a mass body moves away from an external center of mass.]

Which [perhaps wrongly] in my imagination is separate and distinct from photons following the non-Euclidean geometry of relativity.

Because the probability wave explanation [also] describes why a photon's trajectory proximate to a mass field would arc/curve around it.

A photon can't accelerate, so it can't gain any vector energy so in my mind it just follows the non-Euclidean geometry of space-time/relativity,

which is not what I would label 'gravity'.

Do photons lose or gain frequency energy [which would also mean relative mass] moving towards or away from an external center of mass?

Actually thinking about things always raises [more] questions, arrgghh!

Paul Levy, Quantum Physics: The Physics of Dreaming, Awaken in the Dream