Collecting this genre of image if anyone has any additions:
seen from China

seen from Brazil
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Japan
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Russia
seen from Russia
Collecting this genre of image if anyone has any additions:

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
If a creator is vocally pro-piracy I will buy their stuff out of respect. If a creator is vocally anti-piracy I will pirate their stuff out of spite. Sit your entire ass down
Back to the "Gamers need to be more comfortable not owning their games" BS again for a second
No, I genuinely do not believe that anybody should be "comfortable" with the idea of not owning something they bought.
If you buy something, you should own it, and the company that sold it to you should not be able to take it away on a whim. The idea that you don't own your purchases is one that you should never be comfortable with.
Imagine if you bought a movie on DVD, and then later on, the person who sold it to you breaks into your house and takes it back. Would you be comfortable with that? Didn't think so.
Anyway, it's been said by so many people, and I said it in my original post about this, but it bears repeating; if buying something isn't owning it, then pirating it isn't stealing.
How I sleep at night knowing that the concept of intellectual property is ontologically evil and there is no action against it which is immoral
short version: Orchard records made claims on a video that existed forever before the "song" that they're saying he stole
It's such fucking bullshit, like, don't fucking use content ID to "protect" your shit anyway (it ends up limiting your audience and pissing people off), but the fucking hypocrisy of sampling someone else without their explicit permission then using content ID? Already absurd on its own, but this case is even more stupid. I'm betting you noticed that I put the word "song" in quotes up there, well it seems like the "artist" just sliced out the silence in the video and put some effects + their own name on it.
Apparently it wasn't even the stock samples it was samples his friends gave him. This is what IP theft actually looks like, and it's being done by a record label in the name of "protecting copyright."

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'd be a lot less pro-piracy if these huge companies actually paid their workers well instead of making massive profits for their shareholders year after year. I don't care if my money could have gone to the person doing the work if 99% of it just gets siphoned into some greedy asshole's wallet.
I don't even actually pirate that much stuff, nowadays I've mostly replaced TV with Twitch streams, which, yeah, Twitch keeps 50% of sub revenue, which sucks, but most of these streamers have ways to tip them where they keep everything but paypal fees.
I'm not going to claim it's perfect. There are huge disparities in streamer revenue that have little to do with how much work they put in or how good they are at it, but at least the money actually goes to the streamers.
And with games, indie studios are doing so much cool stuff while the AAA space is all $70 games with microtransactions and rushed buggy launches.
So, like, I'm pro-piracy, but I don't pirate that much. Most of the stuff I'd feel okay pirating is stuff I don't even want. It's all kinda boring, the people with money don't want to take any risks so it's all just adpatations and reboots and none of it actually looks that interesting.
The famous quote by Gabe Newell, the CEO of Valve Corporation, the company which created the following critically and commercially mega-successful franchises:
Half-Life,
Counter-Strike,
Team Fortress,
Portal,
DOTA 2,
and the biggest digital store for buying games, Steam, goes something like this:
“One thing that we have learned is that piracy is not a pricing issue. It’s a service issue. The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work. It’s by giving those people a service that’s better than what they’re receiving from the pirates.” (Source: “How Valve Experiments with the Economics of Video Games.” GeekWire, 23 Oct. 2011, www.geekwire.com/2011/experiments-video-game-economics-valves-gabe-newell/. )
And thus, pro-piracy advocates have taken that statement and ran with it. They tell you how successful Steam is in places that have had huge issues with video game piracy such as Russia, and they talk about how music piracy cratered once Spotify and Soundcloud and Bandcamp and all the other music streaming services came out, and they jump up and down and say “See? See? People WANT to spend money on things! They WANT to give artists and large companies money! They want to spend money on books and movies and TV shows and video games and other consumer media! Just let them have easy access to it at an affordable price, and people will stop pirating! It’s not because piracy lets them have it for free, it’s because piracy just lets them have it at all in the first place!”
My response is two-fold, and has been for a long time:
1: Anyone who pays money for media they can get for free is an un-serious idiot and should be ignored completely.
2: How can anyone make a better service than piracy?
For point 1: Several months back I was at a local Barnes and Noble. I was looking through their bargain bin section when I saw a book called The Diabolic by S. J. Kincaid. It looked so new, it seemed like it had just been pulled from the shelf. A “Cheap $5″ sticker was attached to it. The MSRP? $17.99.
I saw the book, picked it up, read the synopsis on the inside of the dust jacket, and figured that I wanted to read this book and support this author by buying it. But I realized that I had a choice on how to do that. I could purchase the $5 book, which was in as near pristine a condition as a book in the bargain section could be, or I could go and purchase the full price, $17.99 version of the book, either online or at a different store.
Anyone with a basic understanding of economics will probably look at that dilemma and go “That’s so stupid! You OBVIOUSLY pick the $5 book! You get the exact same thing at a lower price!”
So piracy advocates: Why should I, a reasonable consumer, pay money to any streaming service like Netflix or HBO Max or pay any amount of money to any store when I can find a place to have access to all of it, in one place, for free, without any ads or other interruptions?
For point 2: Steam is one of the biggest video game digital storefronts in the entire world. It has more video games for sale than anyone can feasibly keep track of, with more being released on the platform for purchase every day.
Except for Nintendo products.
If you like Pokemon, Metroid, Legend of Zelda, Smash Bros., Kirby, Splatoon, or any other product made by/for Nintendo game consoles, you’re shit out of luck. You have to buy Nintendo made game consoles to play them.
Unless you pirate them. In which case you can play any of those games on an emulator on your computer.
So, Steam isn’t the best possible service, right? It doesn’t have the most video games accessible to their audience, piracy does by having games for nearly every console you can think of and even a few you might have forgotten about. It doesn’t have the best price, because piracy is free. And it doesn’t even consistently have the best product; time and time again people who release pirated versions of games also take the time to make a better version of it. Case in point, when Metroid: Dread was released, Kotaku had a whole article about how the pirated emulator version had a better visual quality than the official version available for sale by Nintendo for their Switch console. (Source: “Metroid Dread Is Already Running on Switch Emulators.” Kotaku, kotaku.com/metroid-dread-is-already-running-great-on-switch-emulat-1847833403. Accessed 6 May 2022. )
This extends to movies, tv shows, but particularly to stuff that’s made outside of the United States like manga or anime. The manga and anime you can have access to from your bookstore or retail store or even from websites like Amazon or RightStuf is constantly limited by licensing agreements, companies going bankrupt, and other factors that result in “official” material becoming out-of-print and much more expensive than it should be. My personal favorite manga ever, Lucifer and the Biscuit Hammer, has been out of print for YEARS and despite an anime adaptation coming in the near future as of writing this, there is no way to legally purchase the five omnibuses that make up the series without being willing to spend HUNDREDS of dollars.
Now, before anyone calls me a consumer whore licking the boots of the corporations because I’m criticizing people who advocate piracy, I want you to understand something: I am 100% in favor of having art of all kinds being readily accessible to everyone, everywhere, all the time. I work at a library, for God’s sake! A library! A public service that lets people access more books, movies, TV shows, music, and other media than you can shake a stick at for the low, low price of $0! Newspapers, cookbooks, art instruction books, craft instruction books, audio books and large-type books for the visually impaired, children’s books, young adult books, multi-lingual books, databases, books about local history, books about world history, documentaries, magazines, poetry, short stories, stories with BIPOC characters, stories with LGBTQ+ characters, books written BY BIPOC and LGBTQ+ authors, even some video games in some libraries, and if we don’t have it physically in the library, we can either place a request for it to be physically shipped to us for you to check out or you can probably find it online with one of the MANY library apps that let you check out EVEN MORE THINGS! Everyone should LOVE libraries and have a library card and check out all the things you want for free! Libraries are AMAZING! Everything should be like the library: readily accessible to the public, free, and easy for anyone to use.
And piracy, time and time again, has proven to be the closest thing to a library that I have ever seen. Piracy is the best way for the consumer to find what they want, get what they want, and keep it forever.
But so rarely do I ever see people who claim to be “pro-piracy” ever behave like they are IN FAVOR OF piracy. They always talk about piracy as if it’s a bad thing, that it’s a thing they HAVE to do, that they wouldn’t pirate stuff if they had any other option. And as someone who doesn’t pirate on purely ideological grounds (the “Piracy feels like I’m stealing and I don’t like stealing” argument) that do NOT stand up to scrutiny in any way besides being 100% emotion driven, I have to say you all sound like unserious idiots and bigger corporate bootlickers than I could ever be. The corporations who make the media you want do not care about you, have never cared about you, and will never care about you; why do you spend time trying to change that?
Just say “Fuck ‘em”, and take what you want. You don’t have to bend yourself into pretzels over who it is or isn’t morally correct to pirate from, you just pirate.
Of course, that makes you sound like entitled assholes who just want shit for free, but hey, at least it’s honest and straight-forward.
look im 100% a law-abiding citizen and would never think of stealing from a meg corporation. But if someone just so happened to help me find an adobe premiere pro download for mac it would be v nice