Defining the Line Between Spin & Sin
For spokespeople to be effective, itās vital that they understand the nuances between lies, deception and spin.
In her book LYING: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life, philosopher Sissela Bok defines deception as that which occurs when āwe communicate messages meant to mislead ā¦ meant to make them believe what we ourselves do not believe.ā Ā To her, lying is āany intentionally deceptive message which is stated.ā
In other words, to lie, you must make some form of statement; you cannot lie by simply omitting facts. If you omit facts to create a false impression, you are practicing a form of deception. Ā
During my 33-year career, I have seen very few media training consultants or public relations practitioners counsel clients to lie or intentionally deceive the world when they face stakeholder groups or reporters. However, I have witnessed many situations in which the client (as spokesperson) has spun an issue or not been forthcoming with the truth. (Ignoring the question and talking about āwhatās really importantā is a perfect case in point.)
In a presentation to the American Political Association a few years ago, political scientist John J. Mearsheimer provided a definition of spin that I have used many times because it clearly delineates spin from both lying and deception. According to Mr. Mearsheimer, spin occurs when someone links together facts in a way that attempts to portray an individual or organization in the best possible light. Ā
Chances are, if youāve ever sent out a rĆ©sumĆ©, you have practiced a form of spin. Spin involves downplaying or ignoring certain facts that would create a negative perception, and emphasizing those that create a positive perception. The emphasis is on making the individual or organization look as good as possible by focusing attention on the positives. Ā
The thin line between spin and sin lies somewhere between the creation of a true impression and a false impression, resulting from which decisions or facts are included, which facts are omitted, and how the facts are structured.
In other words, if the facts are true and the impression left by those facts is true, the overall approach is ethical.
However, if the facts are true but the impression left by the selection or organization of those facts is false or misleading, the precise location of the ethical line needs to be discussed or reviewed by all those involved. If we leave this impression, are we opening ourselves to criticism?
If the facts are untrue, and people in the organization know them to be untrue, the organization is lying. Ā
Spin is not necessarily a form of deception, provided that the story created by the facts is not intended to mislead and the facts underlying the story are true. But the line between spin and sin is definitely crossed when there is no conscious effort to portray an accurate or truthful version of the story. Ā Ā
Asking Questionsāthe Only Protection
The only protection someone has against deception, lies or spin is asking questions. By definition, this makes the skill of answering questions extremely important if an organizationās spokespeople hope to maintain high moral ground during situations of real or perceived hostility.
By asking questions, stakeholders and journalists can determine which facts are highlighted and which are ignored, and whether the person answering questions is engaging in some form of deception, lie or spin. This is why interviews, not just rƩsumƩs, are important to the hiring process.
From a formal perspective, this is what happens when prosecutors and defense attorneys (or plaintiffs and defendants) square off against each other in a court of law. This is also what happens in the court of public opinion when reporters ask spokespeople about the actions, activities, opinions and behaviours of the organizations they represent. Ā
And, in an information-driven world, this makes the skill of answering questions clearly and concisely absolutely critical, and pause-answer-stop the foundation on which the line between spin and sin can be constructed and maintained.
Eric Bergman, BPA, ABC, APR, MC, FCPRS, is arguably the worldās most credentialed and experienced media training consultant. He has helped organizations manage issues and crises, and coached spokespeople, for more than 30 years.
To learn more about his media training program, At Ease With the Media, please click here.
