Postman too heavy? The best Postman alternative in 2026
You open Postman to send one quick request, and your fans spin up like you just launched a game. Check Activity Monitor and there it is, hundreds of megabytes gone before you've touched a single endpoint. This isn't you imagining things. It's one of the most documented complaints about Postman on Reddit, dev forums, and long-form Medium teardowns, and there's a specific technical reason behind it.
Why Postman feels heavy
Postman runs on Electron, which means it bundles an entire Chromium browser inside the app just to render its interface. A developer writeup on Medium didn't mince words, framing Postman as little more than a bloated, memory-hungry shell wrapped around basic curl requests. Even Electron's own documentation admits the trade-off, acknowledging that you're exchanging memory for developer convenience. On a machine with limited RAM or an older CPU, that trade-off turns into real friction, and it gets worse the moment you run a collection with multiple scripted requests, since CPU spikes show up even for tasks that are mostly just network calls.
That overhead isn't hypothetical either. There's an open GitHub issue on Postman's own repo describing serious performance problems tied to how Electron interacts with recent macOS versions, causing high GPU usage that has nothing to do with the API you're actually testing. So if you've felt like your API client is fighting your Mac instead of helping you, you're not wrong, and you're not alone.
What a real Postman alternative should look like
If you're searching for the best Postman alternative, resource use should be the first filter, not an afterthought. A genuinely lightweight tool should:
Launch in under a second, not spin up a browser engine behind the scenes
Use a fraction of the memory for the same request and response workflow
Stay responsive during multi-request collection runs
Still support the essentials: REST, GraphQL, WebSockets, OAuth 2.0, JWT, and Postman collection import so migrating doesn't mean starting from zero
Where HTTPBot fits in
This is exactly the gap HTTPBot was built for. It's a native REST API client for Mac, iPhone, and iPad app written with Swift, not Electron, so it talks directly to macOS instead of routing through a browser layer. That native architecture is the whole reason it launches fast and stays light even during longer testing sessions.
If you want the deeper technical breakdown of why that matters, this piece on native REST clients for Apple devices covers it well, and the HTTPBot vs Paw vs Insomnia comparison lays out pricing and features side by side.
HTTPBot supports Postman collection import directly, so an existing library of requests doesn't have to be rebuilt from scratch. Pricing is straightforward too: $4.99 per week, $19.99 per year, or $49.99 for a lifetime license, with no mandatory account and no per-seat costs.
The easiest way to feel the difference is to open both apps side by side and watch Activity Monitor. Download HTTPBot and see how much lighter API testing can feel when the app underneath it was actually built for your Mac.
