#pologate

Graham w/ 7 years old Marco: maps :)

Graham: our child Marco 🌞

Newgate: what?

Graham: congrats on the surprise adoption!

PoloGate: The Curious Case of the Missing Polo Shirt

📍Jurisdiction: Instagram, agency rosters, and the hallowed archives of deleted posts 🗂️ Case No. 08-PR-SPIN-2025 👩‍⚖️ Presiding: The Honorable Judge Groupchat

RE: VANISHING POSTS, FOLLOWING GAMES & THE FATE OF A POLO SHIRT

Earlier this week, one of this Court’s brightest Prosecutors — tenacious, underpaid, and fueled by almond milk lattes — submitted a compelling argument concerning a certain suspiciously public display of contractual affection between Actress A (of C-List filmography and A-List algorithm strategy) and Actor S (beloved by his fandom, if not by box office numbers).

This morning, the digital streets grew louder: Actress A has now followed @CulturalInfluence, a PR agency of considerable repute (and even more curated client rosters), which this Court has previously associated with brand placements in this very case.

Why now? Was it an unfollow-refollow event meant to send a signal? An algorithm accident? A strategic move whispered from a crisis comms intern?

This Court does not speculate on matters of follows, likes, or soft launches unless accompanied by verified Exhibits and/or a Notes app apology. However...

THE REAL ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT:

EXHIBIT A – The image of Actor S posted on @CulturalInfluence, proudly wearing That Polo Shirt™, has mysteriously disappeared. EXHIBIT B – The @CHE.Studios group shot featuring both Actor S and Actress A (also featuring That Same Polo Shirt™ in what now appears to be a crime scene) has likewise been deleted.

The sudden and synchronized evaporation of both images suggests either:

A strategic scrubbing of narrative (common during contract renegotiations, messy exits, or bad lighting), or

A hasty PR mop-up amid an unforeseen branding entanglement (read: someone wasn’t cleared for campaign usage and Legal got nervous).

Let the record reflect: images do not vanish without cause, particularly not when tied to active campaigns, high-dollar agencies, and contractually obligated torsos.

QUESTIONS FOR THE JURY (AND STAN ACCOUNTS WITH ALLEGED INSIDE INFO):

Is Agency C.I. quietly ghosting Actor S, having deemed his influence... insufficient to move units?

Did Actress A refollow to reclaim narrative control — or simply to trigger gossip algorithms into overdrive?

Was there ever a formal contract with Actor S in place at all? Or was the polo shirt... aspirational?

Were the “romantic strolls” and sun-drenched “vacations” candid love stories... or location-scattered brand activations masquerading as intimacy?

And most importantly: when affection is public, coordinated, and suspiciously well-lit — is it love, or just the last deliverable before the PR budget ran out?

CONCLUSION & CLOSING REMARKS:

Having reviewed the timeline of conveniently timed refollows, disappeared Exhibits, and suspiciously styled “spontaneity,” this Court finds itself at the intersection of Contract Law and Cinematic Coincidence — a place where NDAs go to die and Instagram captions read like Exhibit C.

Let the record reflect: affection this curated rarely comes without deliverables.

The Court will now recess to sip its matcha, review the screenshots, and await further influencer activity masquerading as romance. Counsel for the gossip is advised to remain extremely online.

Jurors — both sworn in and self-appointed — are formally invited to perform their civic duty in the notes, tags, and replies. Your opinions may not be legally binding, but they will be entered into the public record (a.k.a. Tumblr discourse).

Until then...

This Court is adjourned — but never offline. 🧾💼💋

Don't forget Pologate

Actually, we could stay like this all night.