#pcl-r

it is confirmed.

Former FBI Profiler Says Psychopaths ‘Don’t Feel Remorse Or Empathy.’ The brains of psychopaths are structurally and functionally different. Their brains are wired towards high-risk REWARDS by any means possible and at any costs. They do not process or react to fear, guilt, remorse, or empathy like non-psychopaths. They lack the filters of conscience or consequences. https://youtu.be/E0EfpFkmQ2Y They have DUPED others with their pathological lies, so they KNOW they can get away with their criminal activities. You better know the traits of a psychopath according to Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), otherwise, you're the easy MARK: glib and superficial charm grandiose (exaggeratedly high) estimation of self need for stimulation pathological lying cunning and manipulativeness lack of remorse or guilt shallow affect (superficial emotional responsiveness) callousness and lack of empathy parasitic lifestyle poor behavioral controls sexual promiscuit yearly behavior problem slack of realistic long-term goals impulsivity irresponsibility failure to accept responsibility for own actions many short-term marital relationships juvenile delinquency revocation of conditional release criminal versatility Read more: http://www.minddisorders.com/Flu-Inv/Hare-Psychopathy-Checklist.html#ixzz5i6jBA8go

本書では勝ち組サイコパス（危険を察知してうまく潜伏して生き延びている組）、負け組サイコパス（衝動的で危機感がないため逮捕される組）と分類されている。

And where is his evidence that this is universally done in criminology? The only citation for the whole paragraph is DeLisi & Piquero 2011, which, while interesting doesn’t seem to suggest anything to that effect. The later parts of the paragraph (to which DeLisi & Piquero 2011 is relevant) talk about factors relevant to the criminal career being important considerations (like “age of onset,” that is, age at which a person first commits a crime/delinquent act). That stuff makes sense, but including prior criminal behavior and its versatility is basically using your dependent variable as an independent variable for the same dependent variable (i.e. it’s highly tautological). And even if you have it as a separate piece alongside psychopathy, the stability of psychopathy over time would suggest that you’re going to be losing a LOT of your covariance.

He cites Coid, Yang, Ullrich, Roberts, & Hare, 2009 and suggests they used the Psychopathy Checklist Screening Version (PCL:SV). Since this may be read by people who have no idea the significance of those things: Robert Hare invented the PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist Revised), from which the PCL:SV is, of course, derived. This is important because the PCL-R basically requires criminal activity to meet criteria for psychopathy. Therefore, if you’re using a measure that requires criminal activity for the construct, of course you aren’t going to find any people who haven’t engaged in criminal activity. This kind of thing is why people talk about psychopathy being a tautology! I’m not certain exactly what the PCL:SV looks like in that department, but that would be the first thing I would look at.

View On WordPress