#outoniar

For the relationship thing, she is independent you’re right and she has a few aspects/placements that can indicate her constant growth/pursuit for change and self-improvement. She’s head strong in herself, and her multiple Scorpio/Aries placement (aspects to pluto/uranus) might make her seem like the type to seek constant stimulation.

But the part about having difficulties with long-lasting relationship probably isn’t true. Just because a sign is in detriment when it’s on a planet doesn’t mean it indicates someone who struggles to build long-lasting relationship. 

The sign is working to fulfill the planet’s duties as faithfully as any other signs, the behaviour of the sign in the planet is unconventional, but her aspects such as sun-venus and venus-saturn (conjunct) indicates a strong-willed person who sometimes does thing for the sake of principality/loyalty to the subject.

The behaviour of Aries usually leads to wanting to confront the problem/get it over with (**emphasis on the ‘want’: they want to but sometimes they don’t). At the same time, with her sun-venus she tends to hesitate a lot before talking to someone about it.

Her inner-depth is usually reflective of her inner-insecurities and self-comfort (Moon) and thus she might judge something based around how much she knows of herself/how much she can handle and then working that as a ‘base’ for someone else as well (being ‘considerate’ for them in a way - Aries Sun/Venus).

Considering Aries Venus reputations and how people think they’re usually really bad at lasting long in a relationship, as a Sagittarius Venus I have to stand up for them. The problem in Lisa’s chart isn’t her Aries placement, it’s more about how she handles her inner-insecurities and if she expresses them at all in the way that’s good for her. 

From what we can tell (generally) the things she aligns herself to generally do tend to last just because she pushes for it to endure (pushes herself to endure) – she’s resourceful and find her own way to create her own stimuli within the realms of what she’s given (within a constructed ‘box’ of her already-made decisions). 

The problem was never her not lasting long in relationships, the problem is how she deals with her own constriction/weight of her inner-subconscious and not pile it on to herself even more (not knowing when to confront/let go of something when she needs to do it)– rather. 

So yes, she is independent in a way that she wants to be self-sufficient. No, she doesn’t have problems making relationships last, but she does have a problem with balancing herself (inner-> outwards) sometimes. 

As for the sexuality thing, there’s ways to check through astrology for attraction in different shade/ranges (same sex/different sex, platonic/romantic, different types of sexual ranges) – for those of you interested in astrology generally (not-specific to lisa). 

But to check for someone else, sexuality/gender-identity is something the person themselves has to have a choice to express it or not. And it shouldn’t be assumed by the astrologer’s interpretation, before the other person makes their choice. This is just out of respect, privacy and personal rights of someone else. I don’t have the authority/right to express something so personal as her sexuality to the internet. Even if she herself confirm/denies, there’ll be allegations against her anyways. People think what they want to think, but not putting their own words/messages first and taking our opinion/thoughts before theirs undermines their personal freedom.

I hope that’s not too harsh, I wasn’t trying to be mean or anything, I’m just trying to say there’s moral decisions to be made. The field of sexuality can be studied (through astrological lens) but it shouldn’t be presumed of someone without their consent/decision on the matter. (Coming out is a constant fear/anxiety for people in regards to any field/astrology or otherwise)