a certain type of discourse-entrenched blogger is really fucking married to the idea that trans people could only ever be gnc on accident and we're doing our best to stop being gnc as soon as possible

im not a fan of broad "it's not intelligent/it isn't thinking" statements about llms for the same reason im not a fan of statements that someone is objectively not a women

i cant take anyone discussing politics on tumblr seriously because this is the website where we morally equivocate having a shitty tattoo to being a nazi

one day ill own a leather jacket and then youll all see

pmtfo when they make a "low sodium" version of something that wasnt all that salty to begin with. congrats you've made the tomato soup taste like shit and i have to add the damn salt myself. im not buying a tomato soup diy kit for fucks sake

tbh most sex ed type stuff i see seems way more concerned with conveying the Correct Method for [pleasure/intimacy/consent/kink/flirting/birth control/std prevention/etc] than it does with conveying that sex should be a mutually empowering and fulfilling experience for everyone involved, whatever that means to them. like im including a lot of leftish, queer-positive, kink-positive sex ed stuff here. a lot of it seems more concerned with "intimacy is when you have one of these specific emotional dynamics" or "consent is sought and expressed in these ways" or "the intention of participating in kink should be this goal" over, like, the idea that good sex is whatever interactions you and your sex partners have that leave you both with positive relationships to your selfhoods/bodies/all that good stuff and in which you do not feel the burden of pressure or performance. like if what youre saying isnt leaving room for, like, sex work to include good sex, what are you even doing shelving it under sex-positive feminist sex ed. idgi basically.