🤍 Opusfem & Opusmasc 🤍
OKAY, this is very specific term made for someone so let me explain, ima use Opusfem since that’s what I was conceptualizing first
Someone who could consider themself Opusfem is someone who is Masc and or a presentation/gender that isn’t fem in nature but if their partner (romantic. Platonic, whatever terms you use) desired them to be feminine within their relationship (whether around others or simply behind closed doors) the Opusfem person would be totally okay expressing that way!
But they only feel that comfortably being Fem in the confines of The relationship and only if their partner shows interest in that, otherwise a opusfem who isn’t in a relationship or in a relationship where the partner shows no desire for that feminine presentation the opusfem will have no desire to present or be perceived as feminine
(Fem doesn’t make the person female, it’s fem to be more open and it’s up to the user what that means)
If there’s a term like this already uh!!! I couldn’t find it!!!
OpusMasc is this but in reverse, someone who’s usually Fem/not masc but can be Masc within a relationship
Opus is the Latin word for “Need”, I used opus since someone who identifies this way NEEDS that desire from their parter to feel the need to present in a way they wouldn’t on their own
@mogai-archive - @radiomogai - @fem-mogai













