#only foils

Is Magic: The Gathering Losing Its Magic?

The buzz around Magic: The Gathering never truly settles, does it? Just as we're digesting the intricacies of the very recently released Aetherdrift set and navigating its impact on the ever-evolving meta, Wizards of the Coast (WotC) have dropped a bombshell – or rather, two. The long-awaited Final Fantasy and Marvel Spider-Man Universes Beyond crossovers are on the horizon, but with a twist that's leaving many players scratching their heads.

A Long, Long Wait: Why the Early Reveal?

Let's address the elephant in the room: the timing. Both Final Fantasy and Marvel Spider-Man are slated for release well into 2025. This is an unusually long lead time, even by WotC's standards. We're talking about previews that precede multiple mainline sets. Why the early reveal?

One theory is that WotC are aiming to build anticipation, creating a sustained marketing campaign that will keep these crossovers at the forefront of players' minds. It's a calculated move, designed to ensure these sets don't get lost in the shuffle of the ever-expanding MTG release schedule. However, it also raises questions about potential spoiler fatigue. Are we being primed for a year of carefully curated leaks and teases?

The Price of Crossover: A Hefty Hike

Now, let's talk about the cost. Both Final Fantasy and Marvel Spider-Man will feature a significant price increase, with Play Boosters now sporting a recommended retail price (RRP) of $6.99. This represents a near 30% jump, and it comes hot on the heels of the Play Booster introduction earlier this year, which already saw a price adjustment, as well as a reduction in the number of cards per pack.

This begs the question: is this the new normal for Standard? A year ago, players were adjusting to the Play Booster shift. Now, we're facing another hike, and with these Universes Beyond sets being Standard-legal, the cost of participating in competitive play is undeniably on the rise. While WotC might argue that the premium IP justifies the price, the reality is that players' wallets are feeling the pinch.

Spider-Man's Solo Act: No Commander Precons?

One of the most striking differences between the two crossovers is the absence of preconstructed Commander decks for Marvel Spider-Man. This is a significant departure from the Final Fantasy release, which will feature a full complement of four preconstructed Commander decks.

Is this a deliberate move to push players towards Standard? WotC have consistently emphasised Standard play, with store events and promotional support heavily skewed in its favour. Universes Beyond are designed to attract new players, and it seems WotC are keen to funnel these newcomers into the 60-card format.

The allure of Standard is undeniable. The rotating card pool and constantly shifting meta keep players engaged and, let's be honest, buying packs. Is this a purely financial decision? It's hard to ignore the potential for increased revenue when players are constantly chasing the latest meta-defining cards.

A Gap in the Market: Where Are the Standard Precons?

While Commander precons are absent for Spider-Man, there is a gaping hole in the form of Standard preconstructed decks. These decks have historically been a fantastic way to introduce new players to the game, providing a ready-to-play experience straight out of the box.

The lack of such an offering is puzzling. Are WotC banking on the appeal of the Marvel IP to draw players in, regardless of entry points? Or is this a sign that they are solely focused on the Standard and limited formats with these releases? It feels like a missed opportunity to provide a more accessible entry point for newcomers.

A Call to Action: Join the Conversation!

These Universes Beyond releases raise some serious questions about the direction of Magic: The Gathering. The early announcements, the price hikes, and the format focus all point to a bold, if potentially risky, strategy.

We want to hear from you! What are your thoughts on these upcoming releases? Are you excited about the crossovers, or concerned about the rising costs? Join the discussion on our social media platforms:

* Bluesky: @onlyfoils.bsky.social

* Instagram: @onlyfoilsuk

* Facebook: @OnlyFoils

* TikTok: @onlyfoils_mtg

Should Secret Lairs Remain Secret?

Magic: The Gathering has always been a game of evolution. From its humble beginnings with limited card art and no foil options, to the explosion of alternate art treatments we see today, the game has constantly adapted to player desires and market trends. But has this evolution gone too far? We've gone from the excitement of pulling a single, rare foil in a booster pack to some cards in the recent Aetherdrift set boasting six different art/printing variations. Is this too much? Are we drowning in a sea of "special" treatments, diluting what made them special in the first place?

Remember when foil cards were a rare and exciting pull? Now, most standard play boosters contain at least one. This wider availability of foils mirrors the trajectory of alternate art treatments. What was once a unique offering, primarily confined to Secret Lair Drops, has become increasingly prevalent within standard set releases. These Secret Lairs, initially a way for players to opt-in to unique and often wacky art styles, provided a dedicated space for the truly out-there designs. They allowed players to curate their collections with the styles they loved, without forcing them upon those who preferred the classic Magic aesthetic.

However, the lines have blurred. Sets like Aetherdrift showcase some of the most divisive artwork in recent memory. While some players embrace the bold, unconventional styles, others feel alienated by them. This has led to a split in the player base, with pre-release events and online forums buzzing with debate. Anecdotal evidence from recent pre-releases suggests that the "funky" artworks and card treatments in Aetherdrift have been particularly controversial, creating two distinct camps of opinion.

This isn’t the first time Wizards of the Coast has tried to inject more "fun" into the game. Project Booster Fun, launched a few years ago, aimed to address a perceived demand for more special artwork cards. However, this initiative was scaled back due to unintended negative consequences. It appears that the initial concept, whilst well-intentioned, began to negatively impact the game as a whole. This scaling back demonstrates that even Wizards of the Coast have realised that maybe they have gone too far in flooding the market with different card variations.

In my opinion, a few special treatments as chase cards are a welcome addition. They add excitement and collectability. However, when everything is special, nothing is special. The value and impact of these treatments are diminished when they become ubiquitous. It's like that old saying: if you shout all the time, no one hears you when you really need to be heard.

Furthermore, while I appreciate artistic expression, I believe that unique or showcase artwork included in standard set releases should still adhere to the templating rules of standard card design and remain in keeping with the set's aesthetic. Whacky, cartoony, sparkly, glittery, or otherwise unusual cards have a place, but that place should be in optional offerings like Secret Lairs. Players should be able to choose to pursue these styles, knowing exactly what they are getting. They shouldn't be forced upon players who are simply looking for the standard MTG gaming experience.

This also feeds into the ongoing debate around Universes Beyond and IPs outside of MTG being included. Many players feel that these crossovers, while sometimes interesting, detract from the core fantasy world and experience of Magic: The Gathering.

The question remains: should Secret Lairs remain secret? Or has Wizards of the Coast lost its focus when it comes to unique card treatments and their use? The Aetherdrift controversy highlights the growing tension between artistic experimentation and the core MTG experience.