I have to say I'm just so disappointed in this blog. I was excited to see such great art with a Pride related spin on it. However, more and more, I just see gatekeeping constantly popping up. It's become too much and I hope that the people I shared it with at my school's Pride group aren't hurt by reading the dismissive things you've had to say about their sexualities, romantic orientations or gender identities.
Well, Iâm sorry you feel so disappointed in this blog, but I really donât think thereâs anything I can do to make you feel better about the situation. Â I do not believe in censoring my beliefs, and do not wish to expend the time and energy on drawing pride art for identities that I see as unnecessary and even detrimental to LGBT communities (looking at you, stargenders).
I donât understand this obsession tumblr has with making gatekeeping seem like the root of all evils. Â Every community has gatekeeping. Â If youâre cis, you do not belong in the transgender community. Â If you feel sexual attraction, you donât belong in the asexual community. Â If you feel romantic attraction, you donât belong in the aromantic community. Â Itâs as simple as that.Â
Of course, people who are gender nonconforming may find it easer to relate to trans people and even find some sense of safety among them when compared to being around gender conforming people, just as someone who experiences very minimal sexual/romantic attraction may enjoy the company of asexual and aromantic people more than that of other allosexuals.  And thatâs perfectly fine! I know I personally donât have a problem with allies who are able to relate somewhat to my experience with my asexuality sharing their thoughts around me. Â
The problem is, however, when cis GNC people and low attraction heterosexuals overstep their bounds as allies and try to claim an equal place in formerly closed communities. Â Thatâs how you get non-dysphoric âtransâ kids who ID as vague things like stargender because they have never experienced what it really is like to be trans, and how you get ridiculously specific labels like âfrayromanticâ and non-aromantics overanalyzing every aspect of their love lives in order to fit in with aromantics. Â Itâs not good, and itâs extremely detrimental to the LGBT community in that it lessens the validity of actual identities like asexual and makes all of us look like weâre just trying to be âspecialâ and âdifferent.â Â And since this blog is intended to celebrate LGBT identities, I would rather not contribute to this toxic belief that has gained traction on here, that anyone can be LGBT if they âidentifyâ as LGBT. Â
I never said there was anything wrong with being demisexual, lithsexual, etc.  These terms work very well for describing levels and preferences of attraction that otherwise might be hard to put into words.  And Iâve stated that you can still belong to the LGBT community if you are demisexual, as long as you are either non-heterosexual, non-heteroromantic, transgender or intersex as well.  But on the other hand, there isnât anything wrong with being cis or being straight, and I hope these children labeling themselves as ânebularomantic lithsexual stargender nanogirls uwuâ one day wake up and realize this. Â
I think your schoolâs pride group will survive me putting demisexuality and graysexuality on a lower pedestal than actual sexual and romantic orientations. Â And if not, then they can find another pride art blog ÂŻ\_(ă)_/ÂŻ Thereâs plenty on them on here that accept all identities as equal, and so will let any straight/cis kid with bunself pronouns and a neurodivergent-only sexual orientation use them as a mouthpiece. Â My blog is not one of them, and I urge anyone who had that impression of me to unfollow or block me.Â
All said, thank you for being polite in your comment. Â Good luck with your pride group, and I hope you find another, more accepting blog that better fits your standards of inclusivity. Â