#nullies

See the world is a complicated and complex place, but I am aware that it is often the simple-minded crowd that sees everything as black and white. And whatever doesn’t fit into this is ignored. So no wonder some of the Nullies want people to believe that ANYONE who says something negative about SH is a “loser” or part of the “nasty, biased, malicious and misogynist Hater-skeptics”.

See one Nully talking here:

and here:

Oh but will you look at this: The readers over on Celebitchy aren’t skeptical about BC and SH marriage. They don’t speculate whether it’s just for publicity and express doubts regarding its legitimacy. Nor do they question BC and SH’s parenthood of little C. And yet some people are snarking about SH and are speculating about the rapid decline of interest about BC. Are these people also “haters”? Ask yourself that. I think it would do you some good because I think more healthy to accept different opinions except own’s own.

Some Highlights:

“Is he maybe embarrassed by her lack of charisma?”

"Her neck craning and odd smiles are misinterpreted. Maybe she lives in her own world.”

“Sophie has a lot to do with the public turning against him”

“It has to do with her being numb, bland and smug.”

“It was quite disillusioning how she credits other people’s work for herself.”

“Before you could see he was enjoying himself surrounded by people”

“How far the mighty have fallen on CB!”

“He looks like he’s facing his own execution.” 

“She just looks pleased as punch to be getting her picture taken”

“She comes off famewhorish.”

And about SHC (Hunter’s pushy PR site): “And anyone who suggests otherwise is just a bitter old crone who wished they had half her beauty and talent”