speaking as a traumagenic system, the group supposedly hurt by endogenic systems: no they ain't ableist lmao. the blog headmatesfaq has a /tagged/endogenic and a faq that might be helpful to you, tumblr is a cesspool of information in a manner pretty similar to the panphobia that you work to disprove tbh. sorry about that ask it sucked
anonymous: i believe endogenic systems are systems without trauma , did/osdd thing
anonymous: Hi, as a system, you getting into syscourse as a singlet, no matter what āsideā your on, makes us EXTREMELY uncomfortable. You arenāt part of our intracommunity discourse. Please stay out of it. It comes off as ableist and uneducated. /not mad
anonymous: hey, DID system here. anons trying to get singlets into syscourse is extremely harmful. singlets have no place in syscourse and often just makes the topic even harder to get into when it's already a really intense topic. syscourse is extremely complicated and often aggressive for people involved. ntm there's medical sources discussing the idea of endogenic systems, so for people to try to push you into being against them when you're not a system is really dangerous and shitty of them to do.
so i hope you donāt mind i added the other messages i got about this into this one and am going to reply to them all at once. but yeah, that message did suck, because clearly they were trying to start shit or convince me of something. but idk why theyād think iād just take their anonymous word for it lmao have they ever been on my blog before. but thank you for the blog to check out! (although, given the second anon message, iām not sure i feel like i have any place so much as educating myself on the topic).
to the first anon......yeah, iāve gathered that much.
to the second anon..... iām not āgetting intoā anything. i included a term in a post about queer that iāve seen people i follow/trust including in queer, and told one anon who wanted to start shit that i donāt know anything about the topic they brought up and would rather learn about it than just take their word for it. iām sorry if my wording came off like i was going to like...start debating shit or whatever, but i have no intentions of doing that.
to the third anon......yeah i was just trying to be inclusive of folks i see on twitter who donāt want to be left out of queer stuff. i wasnāt opening up the blog to this conversation or whatever. and iām kind of annoyed that iām now being accused of getting involved in stuff that i shouldnāt (again, had no intention to ever get into discourse about this) and that others are upset about it. clearly i shouldāve just deleted that anonās message, but i didnāt think saying iām not taking the bait the anon was giving me and wanted to actually learn about the topic myself would cause issues.
anyways, i just wanted to clear that up and this is the last of this topic on here ā














