ive been thinking about your posts about nonrealization a lot lately, realizing there was a term that encompassed a few different things like that has been very helpful in helping me process stuff.. a lot about the "parts vs people" kind of topics especially, since i knew before that feeling a certain way about that was a sympton, but tying into the bigger concept like that made it feel a lot more "legitimized" i supposed, especially in trying to get the point of things across. but, that's also why i'm in your inbox right now. i feel like i can effectively argue that aspect of the conversation, but there's like one thing that still almost like.. is keeping me from being able to hold onto things strongly and keep convincing myself
what would you argue in response to like... definitions of being a "person"? because of course things like "personality" or "self" are flexible/can be differently defined enough as it is, and i feel like in some (maybe even a lot of?) peoples cases they might simply be stretching the definition of a "person" (extending to i guess a state of conciousness being enough to qualify) and for me it feels.. kind of hard to battle even with myself about it
I'm glad you found the concept of nonrealization helpful. It's been very helpful for me too.
It's been really helpful for me to have a label for my own experiences; to be able to say, "I'm feeling this way because of nonrealization," or "that part of me is stuck in nonrealization, how can I help them shift perspectives a little?"
It's also been helpful for me to view others with more compassion, when I recognize that they are speaking from a place of nonrealization and that it's not helpful for me to argue with them about their beliefs/feelings. (It's not my job either!)
[ Link for folks who don't know what we're talking about. ]
When we take a big philosophical or existential view of things, the concept of "personhood" does get harder to define. Philosophers have been arguing about this sort of thing forever. But I'm not viewing my experiences with DID through a philosophical, existential, or spiritual lens. I'm viewing my experiences with DID through a psychological lens, where the concept of personhood is more specifically defined.
Every modern scholarly source on DID that I have read affirms that alters are not separate people and are dissociated parts of one whole person. Psychology's perspective is DID is not "multiple people in one body" but a fragmented sense of self.
I have my own struggles with parts who don't realize that they are part of one whole person, and because of that I'm sometimes very triggered by people who share their belief that alters are separate people. Whether it's in dealing with my own parts or other people who are expressing those feelings, I'm working on responding with more compassion and understanding. I do think it is best viewed as another aspect of nonrealization and something that is an expected symptom of DID/OSDD, but also something that many of us are choosing to work on and decrease.















