LittleWhitehead - Blackhood, 2018
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Martinique
seen from Peru
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Norway
seen from Indonesia

seen from Czechia
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from China
LittleWhitehead - Blackhood, 2018

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Discussing the group show âsensational and anti-generative successionsâ @ Nir Altman, Munich (opened 2019-10-25)
Participating artists: Brandon Covington Sam-Sumana, Steffani Jemison, Ndayé Kouagou, Kengné Téguia Curated by: Cédric Fauq
Conversants: The Bensplainer and Victor Sternweiler ... sitting on a bench at ca. 11 pm, after the opening of the above mentioned exhibition.
The Bensplainer: So, I think it was a good selection.
Victor: Probably the finest show at Nir Altmanâs up to date. But itâs a matter of taste.
The Bensplainer: On the other hand, the eccentricity of artists like NdayĂ© Kouagou and KengnĂ© TĂ©guia allows us to experience some weirdness. Kouagou comes from poetry, thus heâs not a trained visual artist. Nevertheless, there is something genuine about the way he visualized and acted his performance, as well as he presented his sculptures. Yeah, one cannot really say that this performance was somehow newâŠ
Victor: What do you mean with new?
The Bensplainer: There were many 1960s references. The first name which popped into my head is Bruce Nauman, of course. Magda made a further comment, mentioning Samuel Beckett. So, this is the kind of tradition Kouagou seems to refer to, yet interpreting it freely. On a reception levelâthus probably only through my eyes and experiencesâI also like to see it as an unintentional criticism at analogous performances so popular in Munich: Kouagou didnât read. He really performed.
Victor: It wasnât this type of lecture performance.
The Bensplainer: Exactly. Like those by Tris Vonna-Michell some 15 years ago. I find Kouagouâs performance was properly theatrical.
Victor: I donât think it was theatrical, in the stiff sense performances in the white cube are exercised nowadays, to my perception. It didnât come as a thoroughly choreographed piece. He reacted to the audienceâs reactions and comments in a natural wayâcall it postdramatic. He probably did it for the 20th time.
The Bensplainer: Isnât theater âtheater,â if you perform a piece more than once?
Victor: Even if it was, he performed it very 'leggero.' The reason why I liked it in particular is that most of the white cube performances nowadays don't seem to be informed by what has been happening in theater domain, they come along either as lecture performances or as sacred rituals in dramatic settingsâthese performances are oftentimes taken too seriously by their originators. The audience is supposed to be quiet and every move feels like an unwelcome interruption.
The Bensplainer: I wrote a message to Magda before, asking about her opinion on the performance, since she had to leave right after.
Magdaâs text response: NdayĂ© was performing his blackness most strongly (or rather the moment I felt my whiteness as part of the all-white audience) was when he said (and I misquote) "I like boundaries - you stand there and I am here." I think he might have also drawn a line with his hands. I wonder whether previous audiences were so homogeneous. What about the Childish Gambino's musical video?
Victor: I donât know the video in question, but it is funny, because it might have more to do with her general cultural sensibility apperception, than with Kouagouâs performance.
The Bensplainer: Magdalenaâs point is interesting, because formally that is consistent: Kouagou was performing with top half naked, only wearing sort of lacerated beige trousers and black sneakers. Gambinoâs costume is similar, as he wears some grayish trousers, which could refer to the Confederates' military uniform during the American Civil War. Thereâs probably a shared symbolism: this might be Magdalenaâs suggestion.
Victor: I donât really buy into that logic by linking gestures in an art performance, say not wearing a shirt, to the notion of origin or even of politics of blackness etc. I find it a very vague link. In that case we could paradoxically link it to Freddie Mercury's persona, as well. I mean, he performed most of his life topless, on stage. But letâs go to the factual description of the performance.
The Bensplainer: Well, in the first part Kouagou came into the gallery space, he carried a plastic white chair, then put it on one side of the invisible stage of the gallery.
Victor: That plastic garden chair is perhaps the most popular design object ever.
The Bensplainer: He turned on some music from his phone. He started moving quite mechanically Ă la Nauman, tracing a square around the chair on the floor, at first only step by step â 2 steps each side â, then framing it with tape for the audience. That task remained incomplete. Then he sat down on the chair, and stopped the music. So, the performanceâs second act started, and it was about him performing his material, randomly moving his body or the chair outside and inside the taped square. He acted in a Beckett-style text.
Victor: Kouagou seemed to improvise it, talking about love, and âI donât know what Iâm doing hereâ alike, so back and forth. Quite an ironic commentary of him on the bourgeois type of galleriesâ audience, I think. But what do you think about his objects?
The Bensplainer: You mean the sculptures, the Untitled (no dates) hanging from the ceiling? These are more problematic in my view. They were stashed between, I think, two layers of A3-sized Plexiglas. On one side there was printed some texts, which echoed what he recited within the performance. Inside the two plexiglass sheets, there were shirts crystalized with resin.
Victor: Then there was the frame jeans jacket, half folded and wrinkled.
The Bensplainer: This kind of visualization is very typical todayâSeth Priceâs practice comes to mindâas well as this kind of autobiographical attitude.
Victor: What was written on the objects?
The Bensplainer: Again, some statements which recalled the performance, which showed existential frailty.
Victor: Resembling his performance, so to speak.
The Bensplainer: Exactly, like a repetition with difference.
Victor: I liked the way his objects were installed, hanging from the ceiling in that space. There was no wall behind defining their aura. You can generate 360 images when looking at themâa parallax effect. I would like to see them in a real living space situation and I hope nobody installs them close to a wall.
The Bensplainer: They are theatrical in this sense.
Victor: You insist on the term theater, but then we have to talk about Micheal Friedâs rejection of theatricality. I disagree with Michael Fried here.
The Bensplainer: Me too. So, letâs talk about TĂ©guiaâs videos.
Victor: Iâm really curious about what you have to say about them, because, at an opening like that, there are so many people one happens to know and to greet, so I had to skip them completely. Prior to that, letâs talk a bit about the objects that were put or installed on the floor of the gallery.
The Bensplainer: I don't know really, since those works by Steffani Jamison didn't really catch my gaze.
Victor: The two transparent Plexiglas objects [Untitled (De Appel) (2018)] with a painted gesture on them, as big as a hand. They looked like those floor caution signs 'Danger â Slippery,' but the objects were transparent. Iâd love to see that, installed in a non-white cube ambient where people would bump into. There I think of that Barnett Newman quote âSculpture is what you bump into when you back up to look at a painting.â
The Bensplainer: As every great abstract painter, Newman has a sense for wit. At the same time Jamison's two sculptures may also be seen as a straight translation into Plexiglas of very common trestles, found in every artist's studio. The ironic element is clear to me, but not its pictorial concept though. On the other hand, TĂ©guia's three video installations challenged me. All three were shown on cube monitors (CRT) placed on the floor and the audio got blasted through rather modest loudspeakers. The three works deal with repetition both in moving image and sound. As for the moving imagesâbeing a mysterious shadow figure in Times goes by so slowly (2015), a recut of Disney classic Snowhite in Blanche-Neige is my Bitch (2015), or a fragmented reality in Soul Sista x KameugnĂ© (2014)âthey are a reflection on Dara Birnbaum's practice, I suppose. Nevertheless, TĂ©guia added complexity to it with the sound. It is not simply about Birnbaum's manipulation of a found object then, but about his own effort to cover some pop songs while dealing with his deafness. Not that personal narratives were here at stake as a statement: instead, the general claimâthat we can understand the world logo-centricallyâwas questioned here. Who's speaking, and how? And who's hearing, and how? The indeterminacy of perception was accompanied by the observer's possibility to engage relationally with the work, picking up the loudspeaker and listening materially to the sound through its vibration.
Victor: Sounds cool. Can't say anything about it. Whatâs our next drink? âŠ
The Bensplainer: GRAPPA!