Many American workplaces are hierarchical. Decision-making is opaque. Mechanisms of accountability are either nonexistent or weak and deceptive. Yet, at the same time, many workers are enthusiastically told how democratic their workplaces are, much to their frustration. Workplace culture in the U.S. teaches employees that arbitrary rule is normal and that democracy is a deception and a lie. In that context, Trump can seem like an acceptable alternative to the status quo.
The pretense of democracy (during but also before the pandemic) was experienced as intensely alienating and frustrating. Employees felt like they were being lied to and manipulated. In these circumstances, open authoritarianism can feel like a relief. If you are going to be told what to do and can’t discuss or offer feedback that someone will actually listen to, maybe it is better not to even have the pretense of democracy. Open authoritarianism is, of course, what Trump offers. Like many employees, Trump is contemptuous of decision-making by committee. Even before he began his second term, he was arguing that he should be allowed to make recess Cabinet appointments to circumvent the Senate confirmation process. And, of course, on his reality show The Apprentice, Trump was marketed as a decisive boss who made firm, abrupt decisions about hiring and firing, all on his own. The buck, supposedly, stopped with him, for better or worse. As on television, so in the White House: Trump is good at acting as if he has the answers, and providing simple explanations for his decisions, which can feel satisfying to his followers even if those decisions are nonsense or based on lies.
How undemocratic workplaces sowed the seeds of Trumpism












