You cannot rules-lawyer your way safe from bad faith
*jazz hands*
Mike Driver
sheepfilms

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

PR's Tumblrdome
Jules of Nature
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Kaledo Art
dirt enthusiast
h

2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

if i look back, i am lost

tannertan36
taylor price
🪼
Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin

oozey mess

izzy's playlists!
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Georgia
seen from Georgia
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Kuwait
@thatstormygeek
You cannot rules-lawyer your way safe from bad faith
*jazz hands*

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
something you don't learn until you get really far into the making and tinkering life is that there's no such thing as "glue" really. there are so many kinds of substances that stick other substances together and they are all very different and if you just go look at the adhesives aisle in the hardware store the packaging never actually tells you anything useful. it's like "this is SUPER T-REX POWER GLUE" and the fine print says "good for use on wood metal and plastic". okay. but WHICH PLASTICS MY GOOD BITCH,
because SURPRISE, there's no such thing as "plastic" either. every kind of wood is basically the same on a chemical level, but the only thing every plastic has in common is "some of its molecules are long" and that is NOT a quality that determines how things stick together.
I just ordered some stuff I hope will permanently stick a circuit board to a steel sheet and withstand temperatures up to 150 degrees. by the way circuit boards are made of epoxy-bound woven glass cloth which is cool as hell but what the fuck do you glue that with? can any of the 12 kinds of adhesives I currently own do that? no of course not. if I want to stick two pieces of acrylic together so hard they become watertight to a depth of 3000 metres I have some shit that does that, but it does literally nothing else.
anyway. once you start learning how many kinds of sticking things together there are, the people at 3M start to seem like witches and I don't know if they're the kind we can trust with that level of arcane knowledge
Can I introduce you to one of the most useful sites from the early web? It’s thistothat.com and it tells you what kind of adhesives work to stick different types of substances together. It looks like it was designed in 1999 with some ads slapped over the top, because it was designed in 1999…. But like most things from the early web, it does what’s on the label: tells you how to stick this to that.
Arcane knowledge my ass, the internet used to be useful about shit.
FDR already solved the "what are people supposed to DO in a post-scarcity capitalist society besides imploding and then overthrowing the government" with the New Deal and specifically the public works project/Works Progress Administration. the library doesnt really NEED a cubist mural, especially not a government-funded one, but that's the kind of shit you actually should be directing taxpayer money towards if you want to create a relatively stable capitalist socialist state. i mean we did and do actually need bridges and manhole covers and asphalt and apartment blocks which were also a major part of the program as i understand it, in current year of our lord a ton of American infrastructure is still running on top of New Deal concrete which desperately needs retrofitting and maintenance lol, but the new deal funded a lot of library murals too. borderline unthinkable in 2025 to imagine a widely-known and publicly-accepted presidential plan to occupy idle labor force during an employment crisis with building playgrounds and lawns and so on
“Let’s send archivists and historians around to interview old people about their memories of slavery and the Civil War.” 🤯
I mean, if you start thinking creatively about what is worthwhile, you can keep a lot of people employed, and generate incredible things for the next generations of citizens!
You have to actually care about people, now and in the future, though.
we've fully reached "misgendering isn't real" btw. insane take
Right that's why "You will never be a woman/man" is such a common phrase. Because transphobes don't see trans women as women and trans men as men.
And that's why they let trans women into women's sports and "women only" spaces while forcing trans men into women's spaces. Because they see trans men as men, right?
"transphobes do see you as the gender you are" This is not only incorrect, but also exorsexist
Transphobes can't even conceive of my gender identity, let alone know intrinsically what I am on sight. Get real.
and if i said you can draw a direct line from this shit to people rejecting queer theory and the work of nonbinary transfeminists......
Nobody quoted above is confused about what a voluntary conservation notice is. They’re doing a bit. And we’re all expected to sit through the bit every single time a Democrat suggests anything, delivered by people who treat playing dumb like a full-time job with a quota to hit.
There are real criticisms you can make of any politician. Screaming “communism” at boilerplate heat-wave advice probably isn’t one of them.
And the truly maddening part of all this is that none of it was necessary, because Mamdani isn’t above criticism. No politician is, and this one happens to be attempting some of the most ambitious and most contested municipal policy in the country. If you want to come after the mayor over this week specifically, there’s material. Start with the grid. The premise of the whole request is that New York’s power system gets shaky when every air conditioner in the city runs at once. Okay: why? Why does the largest city in the wealthiest country on Earth have a grid that needs coaxing through a predictable summer? What’s the plan to fix it, on what timeline, at what cost? Those are real questions, a serious opposition would be asking them loudly, and I’d honestly like to hear the answers myself. Or push on fairness. Asking people in sweltering walkups to conserve while Midtown blazes all night and Taylor Swift holds her wedding at Madison Square Garden is a genuinely uncomfortable look, and plenty of New Yorkers said exactly that. The city has an answer: Con Edison says the Times Square billboards run on separate distribution networks, so darkening them wouldn’t free up power anywhere else, and the Times Square Alliance asked screen operators to dim their displays anyway. Maybe that answer holds up. Maybe it doesn’t! A critic’s job would be to stress-test it instead of tweeting through the feeling.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Lather, rinse, repeat until you have a new nifty alphabetic acronym (that, as Louise found in her research, people were excited sounds like “ob*sity” if you say it fast) and allows the weight loss industry to get buy-in for their “treatments”
I’ve written at length about the inventing of the term “ob*sity” (aka, simply existing in a larger body) as a way to pathologize bodies, along with subsequent attempts to turn “ob*sity” into a disease itself, based on shared size rather than shared symptomatology and cardiometabolic profile etc. that we use to define real diseases. But the weight loss industry is nothing if not malleable, and despite working hard to convince healthcare providers of this disease construct, there are still some who remain unconvinced. Facing pushback on the idea that a height/weight ratio (or other body size measurement) is all we need to diagnose a “disease,” (though there are plenty of people happy to go along with it,) the weight loss industry has made numerous attempts to more palatably pathologize higher-weight bodies based on whether or not higher-weight people have health issues (that thin people also get.) The “Edmonton Staging System” and the Lancet Commission opinion piece both attempt to diseasify the existence of higher-weight bodies in this way - such that a thin person with health issues like type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension is just a person who has T2D and hypertension, while a fat* person who has the same health issues now has T2D, hypertension, and the “disease” of “ob*sity” or “clinical ob*sity.”
This is the Weight and Healthcare newsletter! If you like what you are reading, please consider subscribing and/or sharing!
We’re going to move on but this is just a reminder that they don’t have a definition or diagnostic criteria, this is diagnosis by vibes and we should not be impressed, or jumping on this bandwagon - it’s not science, it’s not medicine (clinical or otherwise), It’s just plain marketing.
This is the Weight and Healthcare newsletter! If you like what you are reading, please consider subscribing and/or sharing!
The paper was published 4 years after Novo Nordisk launched their 10-year plan to help their GLP-1 weight loss drug reach its “full potential,” centered on “convincing” healthcare providers that “ob*sity” is a disease including by infiltrating research and guidelines. In this iteration “ob*sity” is no longer being re-named adipose based chronic diease but rather, “ob*sity” IS an adiposity based chronic disease (as opposed to the more recent evolution in which ob*sity causes adipose based chronic diseases, but we’ll get to that.) ... More recently I’ve seen the vague claim that adiposity causes “adipose based chronic diseases” which, again, are diseases that people of all sizes (and with all amounts of adipose tissue) get, but that get called “adipose based” when fat people have them. This has predominantly been based on papers that suggest that adipose tissue in some, always undefined, amount could cause (typically risk factors of) diseases. The authors of these papers are typically deeply financially and ideologically tied to the weight loss industry and setting out not to explore a question or hypothesis, but to “prove” that adipose tissue causes disease. An oft-cited paper of this type is “Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ” by Erin E Kershaw and Jeffrey S Flier, 2024 which I discussed in my piece taking dr_idz to school. So what is “adipose based chronic disease (ABCD)”? The harsh reality is that it is whatever the weight loss industry says it is or, perhaps more accurately, whatever they can convince well-meaning people to believe it is.
they should invent putting on sunscreen that doesn't feel like putting on sunscreen
With tightened jawlines, luminious skin, and LinkedIn-ready poses, familiar historical figures get an uncanny makeover from the president’s
The glossy uniformity of the images also serves a political purpose, Anishanslin said. “The message is clearly being sent that the founders were a united group of people and that they were united in their ideologies and politics in creating the nation,” she said. “And that narrative just isn’t true.”
PragerU and Trump are using AI to try and rewrite US history.
The only figure, man or woman, not shown wearing identical American-flag blue is the poet Phillis Wheatley, who wears a pastel shade and who also happens to be the only Black person featured in the gallery. “That light blue gown really sticks out,” said Anishanslin. “It’s meant to set her apart from the others.”
Also no surprise they're racist as fuck.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
being forced to take a second to try and remember if 'reblog' or 'reblog now' is the one where you can add tags and then still picking incorrectly
The thing that Democrats, as a party, have still not yet accepted is that they have to solve the problems. Incrementalism, by definition, solves only part of a problem, which to the regular people who suffer the genuine consequences is the same as not solving the problem. What does this mean, concretely? It means that you need to give people decent health care that they can afford, rather than boasting about taking minor steps down the long road towards that goal. It means that you must give people wages that they can live on, rather than boasting about small economic gains that still leave them too broke. It means that you must attack the power of billionaires until the billionaires do not have too much power any more, rather than advocating for modest tax increases that leave an oligarchy substantially in place. It means you have to expand the Supreme Court and put in term limits and end the antidemocratic unaccountability of the institution, rather than hoping that the inherent robustness of our storied institutions will somehow reassert itself in time to save the day. The distinction that I’m making here is less ideological than practical. The entire pseudo-civil war inside of the Democratic Party over “socialism” is a canard. Nobody really knows what socialism means, and the policy overlap between the socialists and the “progessives” is significant. What is propelling the popularity of the socialists in certain districts is less an upswell in Marx-reading and more the fact that these candidates are touting both policy positions and a fighting attitude that would solve the problems of the people. Medicare for All solves a problem; incremental improvements to Obamacare do not. Aggressive wealth taxes combined with aggressive promotion of mass unionization solve a problem; minor tax increases on the rich and “business and workers can thrive together” platitudes do not. Expanding the Supreme Court and imposing term limits on justices solves a problem; calling on the next Democratic president to appoint someone liberal does not. This list can go on and on and on. The point is that in each of these cases, the left-most position is the one that would actually make a significant positive material impact on the macro-level problem, whereas the incremental approach would mitigate the underlying problem to such a small extent that the average person could be forgiven for not perceiving the change at all. Instead of thinking of the differing approaches to these issues on a left-to-right or radical-to-conservative axis, it can be helpful sometimes to just ask: “What would it take to actually solve this problem, as opposed to just moving somewhat in the right direction on it?”
The moderate's delusion.
Moderates seem not to comprehend that it takes roughly the same amount of political capital to do a little bit of good as it takes to do a lot of good.
It is almost as hard to raise taxes on billionaires by 5% as it is to raise taxes on them by 90%, because it is the direction that generates the opposition, more than the magnitude. Billionaires are going to fight against you raising their taxes, period. If you’re going to have the fight, it might as well be over a change that would, if you win, solve the problem. Moderates are shocked when they can’t mobilize Americans over policies that would not meaningfully change their lives for the better. This is, frankly, stupid. Assess our economic and social and political problems honestly. Decide what measures are necessary to solve those problems. Then fight for those measures. Do not cut your request in half before you begin to fight, due to your mistaken belief that this will make winning your fight more realistic. It won’t.
“you’re such a ray of sunshine!” thanks! one day i chose to act happy and then i kept choosing it over and over and over and over until the neurological pathways formed like desire paths in the thicket. i dug and clawed my nails into the grooves of my brain and carved out joy. i retouch it every day.
"Give us your government-issued ID to access our app's full features" babydoll you are text messages.
i don't remember so i'm not sure this is a thing but how were you taught about the 3/5ths Compromise? that clause of the US constitution that says slaves will be counted as 3/5ths of a person? was it like, oh that's bad because it is dehumanizing to be considered less than a full person?
like that isn't the problem there. these people were already enslaved. everything about how society and the economy and whatever was structured was premised on them not being human. The Problem is for what propose they were being counted as 3/5ths of a person. it was for apportioning representatives and taxes. the south had millions of people enslaved. 3/5ths of those millions were considered for how many representatives the states had in congress. the more slaves, the more political power. and this had repercussions that echo down through to today. and this is reflected today in prison populations being counted for political representation but incarcerated people being disenfranchised. and in gerrymandering and in gutting the voting rights act. in the continued denial of political power to black people.
literally like everything this country does is a badge of slavery. everything is reproducing slavery while trying to forget it.
oh and the other side of the compromises: the taxes. the south could continue to benefit from slavery and accumulated political power as long as it meant the north and the federal govt could accumulate wealth and capital in tandem.
maybe everyone knows this shit already but like the good guys were always benefitting from slavery from the absolute earliest days of this country's founding. they just didn't want the south to keep all the wealth generated from it. everything that happens today is designed to reproduce this.
what i wanna say is that the founding of the United States was premised on benefitting from chattel slavery and any compromise was to make sure every state and the federal government, not just southern slave owning states, could share in the wealth

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"poc person" you are saying person of color person. "poc artist poc writer poc media" that's not what it means!! stop that!!!
why are you guys acting like i'm asking you to move heaven and earth to change how you use one term