You cannot rules-lawyer your way safe from bad faith
*jazz hands*
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Doug Jones
Cosimo Galluzzi

ellievsbear

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
$LAYYYTER
Interview Vampire Daily
The Stonewall Inn
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

PR's Tumblrdome
Claire Keane
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Product Placement
The Bowery Presents

gracie abrams
â

Mike Driver
seen from Chile
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Nepal

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Kenya
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@thatstormygeek
You cannot rules-lawyer your way safe from bad faith
*jazz hands*

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear a case that could determine whether publicly funded preschool programs can exclude children of LGBTQ+ parents. The case, St. Mary Catholic Parish in Littleton v. Roy, challenges Coloradoâs universal preschool program, which requires participating providers, including religious schools, to follow nondiscrimination rules covering sexual orientation and gender identity. Justices granted review for this case on Monday (20 April). The court is expected to decide on this case by June of next year. Arguments will be held during the courtâs next term, which begins in October. Lower courts have so far upheld Coloradoâs policy, finding it applies equally to both religious and non-religious providers. But the challengers argue the rule forces faith-based schools to choose between receiving public funding and adhering to their religious beliefs about marriage and family.
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could determine whether publicly funded preschools can exclude children of LGBT+ parents
The irony of nonblack people specifically calling Black Americans âAmerikkkansâ is baffling to me. Hey I need you to look at me. Who do you think is the predominant target and victim to the kkk. Do you know what the kkk even is. Why do you think calling random black people online and comparing them to the racist group of white people who systematically target, abuse, and execute black people (that are still doing this to this day currently), why do you think doing that is acceptable? Do you have a fucking brain. You can (rightfully) criticize the country of America and its government *without* being fucking antiblack to the people who are historically marginalized.
"just go to a food pantry"
"get a second job"
"start your own garden"
"stop buying name brand"
"don't get your nails done"
"learn to budget"
"live within your means"
Temporary individualistic fixes will never solve systemic issues! God forbid EVERYONE eats and not just me!!
If you can't even say the word "transandrophobia" in a discord, because it's against one of the rules.
How privileged can a group be who's very oppression can't be mentioned without getting kicked out of a 'community space' this is kind of a niche example, but a lot of us(trans people) only have online community spaces.
this is how they treated 'exorsexism' and 'enbyphobia' too. Is what I'm saying. it's the same old same old

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I am reminded of historian Howard Zinnâs âA Peopleâs History of the United States.â In the chapter explaining the rise of the robber barons in the last quarter of the 19th Century, Zinn noted the concentration of power and wealth among an elite few. At the top of the power pyramid were J.P. Morgan, of U.S. Steel, and John D. Rockefeller, of Standard Oil. âMeanwhile, the government of the United States was behaving almost exactly as Karl Marx described a capitalist state: pretending neutrality to maintain order, but serving the interests of the rich. Not that the rich agreed among themselves; they had disputes over policies. But the purpose of the state was to settle upper-class disputes peacefully, control lower-class rebellion, and adopt policies that would further the long-range stability of the system,â he wrote. What is happening in Emporia during the last seven weeks, and in rural communities across the country, has disrupted the local political system of the kind we havenât seen in decades. Once small town governments could be relied upon to provide the necessary services of modern life, such as water and sewer and trash collection, schools for our children, and police to keep us safe on the streets. It typically did so with little fuss, through nonpartisan elections in which feelings might get hurt, but which were of little note to the rest of the country.
Claridge has become the face of data center resistance because video of their arrest at a city commission meeting went hyperscale.
Today my Advanced Clinical Pathology professor trailed off in the middle of class and said, âIf I seem distracted, itâs because last night I was talking with a friend and she asked âWhoâs that chick in Titanic?â but all I heard was âChicken Titanic,â and ever since then Iâve been thinking about a chicken on the bow of the Titanic like Kate Winslet, wings held high. Itâs all I can think about.â
My hand moved on its own
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allieâs roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. âThis night is for the straights,â Swindellâs character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). Itâs also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, thatâs not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They arenât the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond ârepealâ signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. Thatâs just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheepâs clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
can yâall maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia
The years-old joke goes that centrists fight the Left harder than they fight Donald Trump. Itâs no longer a joke: after ârolling over and pl
The political opponents that have the centrist Democrats newly energized and willing to fight like hell are the democratic socialists who have become a powerful organizing force within their party and some of its most popular national figures. Thatâs according to the New York Times, which reported yesterday that the centrist organization Third Way, in concert with unnamed âmoderates,â plan to launch a âdiscrediting campaignâ lasting from now until 2028 that takes aim at the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the group whose members include Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and is a key part of the coalition behind the partyâs Senate candidate in Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed. That campaign will see Third Way not just do opposition research into DSA and target its elected officials but also go after politicians like El-Sayed, who donât identify as socialists but make common cause with the group. âWe are preparing for the next war that is coming,â Third Wayâs president, Jonathan Cowan, told the Times about the campaign. This is a month after Cowan and Third Wayâs executive vice president, Matt Bennett, warned in the Washington Post that DSA was ânot a faction to be appeased,â urging the party to âfightâ the group by pledging âmoney, organization, and spine.â Itâs a well-worn joke at this point that Democratic centrists fight the Left harder than they fight the far right. But here, Third Way and whatever âmoderatesâ are part of this effort are actually giving us an honest-to-God, real-life example of it: centrist Democratsâ big play to push back against Trumpâs wrecking ball of a presidency was to literally do nothing. Third Way itself has been largely invisible, other than to make a list of words Democrats shouldnât use, lead a public campaign against leftist streamer Hasan Piker, and tell Dems to be more hawkish. But now that the Left is winning elections, they are jumping into action, pledging to âfightâ a âwarâ and calling on Democrats to show âspine.â You canât make this stuff up.
[...]
This is the crux of it: centrist Democrats are clearly willing to tear apart their own party and hand power to the forces behind Trump, as long as it means stopping the Left from having any power.Â
7 August 2026
Literally pulling a Weimar Republic. The Republicans have concentration camps, they've jailed political enemies for distributing pamphlets, they are openly trying to destroy democracy and rig elections, but the so-called "moderates" think the "next war to fight" is against people wanting to tax the rich and raise the minimum wage.
This is not about being moderate or centrist. This is class warfare, and rich Democrats are deciding they are on the same team as rich fascists.
The thing about people using delusional as an insult or "delulu" as the trendy new term is that sometimes I really want to sit someone down and tell them that I think they're genuinely delusional and that they can get support and help if they're living with psychosis and that they absolutely aren't alone but even the most neurodivergent-positive person will respond as if I'm calling them the most horrible words in existence.
Delusional is a neutral term. Being delusional is a neutral state. When you contribute to the stigma around delusions and being delusional, you are stealing valuable language from people dealing with psychosis and people who are seeking help and support for the things they're going through. And as a delusional person, it really fucking sucks.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
A movement that says it exists to protect womenâs sports spent Monday mocking womenâs sports as a punchline, attacking the sportâs biggest star, and demanding a league expel transgender women it does not have and has never had.
Three weeks ago the Heritage Foundation â the organization behind Project 2025 â published a report by senior fellow Scott Yenor titled âTitle IXâs Failed Experiment,â which calls the lawâs equal-opportunity requirements for womenâs athletics âpart of a sustained social engineering effortâ designed to produce women who are âmore aggressive, more competitive, more male, less relationalâ â and recommends rolling the requirements back, steering women toward recreation instead of competition while preserving âmajor revenue producing male sports.â The report arrived the month after the Supreme Court let states ban trans athletes from school sports. The trans athletes went first. The plan for whatâs left of womenâs sports followed within weeks: less of it.
A profile, a pile-on, and a loyalty oath.
The years-old joke goes that centrists fight the Left harder than they fight Donald Trump. Itâs no longer a joke: after ârolling over and pl
The political opponents that have the centrist Democrats newly energized and willing to fight like hell are the democratic socialists who have become a powerful organizing force within their party and some of its most popular national figures. Thatâs according to the New York Times, which reported yesterday that the centrist organization Third Way, in concert with unnamed âmoderates,â plan to launch a âdiscrediting campaignâ lasting from now until 2028 that takes aim at the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the group whose members include Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and is a key part of the coalition behind the partyâs Senate candidate in Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed. That campaign will see Third Way not just do opposition research into DSA and target its elected officials but also go after politicians like El-Sayed, who donât identify as socialists but make common cause with the group. âWe are preparing for the next war that is coming,â Third Wayâs president, Jonathan Cowan, told the Times about the campaign. This is a month after Cowan and Third Wayâs executive vice president, Matt Bennett, warned in the Washington Post that DSA was ânot a faction to be appeased,â urging the party to âfightâ the group by pledging âmoney, organization, and spine.â Itâs a well-worn joke at this point that Democratic centrists fight the Left harder than they fight the far right. But here, Third Way and whatever âmoderatesâ are part of this effort are actually giving us an honest-to-God, real-life example of it: centrist Democratsâ big play to push back against Trumpâs wrecking ball of a presidency was to literally do nothing. Third Way itself has been largely invisible, other than to make a list of words Democrats shouldnât use, lead a public campaign against leftist streamer Hasan Piker, and tell Dems to be more hawkish. But now that the Left is winning elections, they are jumping into action, pledging to âfightâ a âwarâ and calling on Democrats to show âspine.â You canât make this stuff up.
[...]
This is the crux of it: centrist Democrats are clearly willing to tear apart their own party and hand power to the forces behind Trump, as long as it means stopping the Left from having any power.Â
7 August 2026
you people gotta get more respectful about disabled and fat people having a sexuality or being sexually desirable đ¤ˇđžââď¸
im tired of it being seen as immoral to find the two/overlapping people from those groups attractive or desirable in a sexual way. I'll be honest, most people who try to advocate for disability or fat lib have been ableist or fatphobic in this instance and it's quite astonishing to see this happen.
how performative justice turns into reactionary disgust.
âtrans men belong to men (the gender) but not men (the sociopolitical class)â
the way you made this distinction has me wondering if the opposite situation is possible: for someone to belong to men (the sociopolitical class) but not men (the gender). im amab nb but im not out to anyone irl, so i feel like i get the same treatment/privilege from society that a cis man would, regardless of if i want it or not. is there some minimum threshold of outward queerness that i need to pass to lose my position as a man (sociopolitical)? if so, is it possible for a trans man to cross that threshold the other way?
Being closeted in my opinion isn't really a point of privelege, so I think once you recognize and identify as non-cis, you aren't really a part of sociopolitical class "men" anymore, since youd lose it once you come out or if someone outs you. To keep the privelege of the SP class Men, you'd have to stay in the closet and outwardly pass as a cis man forever. Which isn't great.
Same logic applies to trans men, particularly those who pass in the eyes of cis men. Sociopolitical class of men requires cis-ness or the assumption thereof. Conditional privelege on being stealth isn't truly privelege because as soon as a trans man is outed to be trans, they lose that privelege and are often punished further for attempting to "claim" something that wasn't theirs. Being out is of course someone's choice, but the privelege in this situation comes from having that choice in the first place. It's just a different closet someone has to hide in, and that's not privelege it's a cage.
and for that matter why have i seen posts on here trying to rehabilitate the reputation of fucking 4chan. like i say this as a person of color tumblr is racist yes but it is not "incited multiple white supremacist mass shootings" levels of racist. it is not "started gamergate" levels of misogynist. what are we doing here. if you found community and support in 4chan good for you but everyone else has the right to feel uncomfortable that you found community among nazis and racists

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Weâve seen this phenomenon for decades with environmental/health and safety regulations. It is cheaper for coal companies to pay the fines than to follow the law, so the coal companies just pay the fines. Weâve also seen it in Elon Muskâs legal arbitrage. We know how this goes. When a company says they are âgoing to treat the water with chemicals so it doesnât flow into the lakes,â that is a limited-duration promise. What the company actually means â the only thing that it can mean, in fact â is that it is willing to make this promise to the community right now in order to sign the deal it is pursuing. At some later date, some C-suite executive (or outside consultant, or politically-connected VC, take your pick) is free to notice that treating the water with chemicals costs a lot of money, and that it would be cheaper to just stop treating the water with chemicals. And then, unless the enforcement mechanism is absolutely ruinous (and, in 2026, they never are), the company will abandon its former promises. And probably give the exec a bonus. The companies could build out the electric grid, constructing massive solar farms to support their massive data centers. But it would be cheaper (for them, in the short term) if they didnât. So, in practice, they generally wonât. You donât have to believe the hyperscalers are particularly villainous companies to conclude you shouldnât believe their promises. You just have to believe they behave like large companies, and obey the same short-term profit-maximizing incentives as every other large company.
you don't have to believe hyperscalers are particularly villainous companies. You just have to believe they behave like all the other large
every now n then i think about how native americans as human beings just dont exist in like 99% of mainstream media. in movies or tv shows or books or video games or you know even in porn like we just arent people. when theres a native character theyre like a wild west indian. like truly to ppl we all died back in the 1900s.
even in things like surveys we are often forgotten about entirely, made out to be so small weâre not important enough/statistically significant enough to bother polling or weâre relegated as literal âotherâs
saw this addition again recently and reminded of this which i saw recently too
A list of recognized religion codes used by military chaplains to aid service members has been reduced from over 200 to just 31