You cannot rules-lawyer your way safe from bad faith
*jazz hands*
Keni
🪼
art blog(derogatory)

ellievsbear

Kaledo Art

Janaina Medeiros
Sade Olutola
One Nice Bug Per Day

#extradirty
Cosimo Galluzzi
Not today Justin
Monterey Bay Aquarium
official daine visual archive
Noah Kahan

Andulka
ojovivo
Game of Thrones Daily
sheepfilms
cherry valley forever
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Mauritius
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Chile
seen from Germany
seen from Chile
seen from Spain

seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Austria

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
@thatstormygeek
You cannot rules-lawyer your way safe from bad faith
*jazz hands*

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
On June 29, Bannon said the White House’s document effort and Pulte would together supply the predicate, his word, for an emergency declaration.
On June 20, Steve Bannon told his War Room audience that Bill Pulte’s job at ODNI is “to get to the bottom of the 2020 stolen election.” Pulte has no intelligence background at all and still runs the Federal Housing Finance Agency while nominally overseeing all 18 spy agencies (a part-time gig, apparently). ... NBC News reported on June 30 that a White House task force is pulling thousands of pages from the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, the Justice Department, and Pulte’s ODNI, with plans to declassify a chunk of it. Running it is John Solomon, the Just the News founder whose Biden-Ukraine misinformation earned him 2019 Misinformer of the Year from my old colleagues at Media Matters, alongside Derek Harvey, a first-term Trump national security aide. And per NBC’s sources, members have been urged to keep redactions light, even where that means leaving in the names of officials and private citizens. The only reasons to publish private citizens’ names in declassified intelligence files are political ones. And Trump keeps leaving fingerprints. On July 1, he told reporters that Pulte has free rein to declassify whatever he wants, 2020 records included, while noting Pulte would only be around another month or two. That same week he posted about meeting Tina Peters, the former Colorado clerk convicted of tampering with voting machines in service of his stolen-election claims, and in late June he torched a bipartisan housing bill’s signing ceremony to squeeze Congress on the SAVE America Act, which he’s taken to calling a national emergency in itself. The one thing this plan still needs, besides a president willing to deliver it on camera, is an audience that hasn’t seen the actual record.
Steve Bannon already said what Thursday’s speech is for. The only question left is whether ABC, CBS, and NBC hand over the airwaves to deliv
Here’s what Thursday’s staging is built to make you forget: the question of foreign involvement in the 2020 election was investigated to death, in real time, by Donald Trump’s own government, under rules Donald Trump signed. His September 2018 executive order requires the intelligence community to formally assess foreign interference after every federal election. The assessment for 2020, declassified in March 2021, found “no indications that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect” of the voting process. Registration, ballot casting, tabulation, reporting: all clean. A companion review by the Justice Department and DHS, with the FBI and CISA doing the digging, hit the same dead end: no evidence any foreign government-linked actor blocked anyone from voting, changed a vote, disrupted a count, or compromised registration data or ballots. Foreign governments did run operations around that election. They aimed at voters’ heads, which is a different thing from touching the vote, and that difference is important. ... Bill Barr, then Trump’s own attorney general, said in December 2020 that the department found no outcome-flipping fraud. Courts tossed the lawsuits by the dozen. Georgia counted its ballots three times, once by hand; Biden won every count. On China, where this push keeps pointing: the intelligence community assessed with high confidence that Beijing considered getting involved and decided it wasn’t worth it. As for Thursday’s declassified props, the likely seed material is already public, and it’s embarrassing. In June 2025, Kash Patel declassified an anonymous tip from August 2020 claiming China had manufactured fake driver’s licenses, built on TikTok data, to flood the mail with fraudulent Biden ballots. The FBI’s own files describe the tip as recalled and never fully pursued, and it falls apart on contact: TikTok accounts had no address field, so the scheme’s fake voters have no addresses; registration checks and ballot signature matching would catch it at any scale; it would require armies of noncitizens to commit a deportable felony officials and courts keep finding vanishingly rare; and when Customs did seize counterfeit licenses at O’Hare in 2020, the government found no link to voting. The Center for Democracy and Technology, anticipating this exact moment back in March, laid out the bar for any new 2020 claim: genuinely new intelligence, an accounting of how it differs from what the spy agencies, DOJ, and DHS already reviewed, and a reason the original conclusions were wrong. Watch Thursday with that checklist in hand.
sorry to keep complaining about serano but also like. the frustrating thing about the "subversivism" narrative is that it puts nb/gq/gnc people in a position where we can never be casually flippant about the binary, or find pride in being nb/gq/gnc in spite of the oppression we face for it. god fucking forbid you make a joke about the binary being boring around the wrong person & now they are talking about you thinking feminine trans women are transphobic for not being transgressive enough, because they feel empowered to interpret nonbinary people in bad faith. can't make any theory which depicts being nonbinary as politically powerful or something that can motivate one's dedication feminism and the fight for collective liberation, cause now that means you think binary gender conforming straight trans people are regressive and you want to forceandrogynize everybody.
its just Funny how nonbinary people are always being depicted as irrational feminine children but also aggressive masculine oppressors who are unfairly attacking the natural binary that must be centered at all costs! i'm sure this implies nothing about certain ideas that have been internalized by everyone by patriarchal society.
btw i have seen some people using ''birthday girl'' to refer to transphobic trans women and i Do Not Like That. don't do that shit.
primarily because i think its fucking weird to have catty little insults for trans people we disagree with, even and perhaps especially when we disagree with them over actually harmful things they've done or rhetoric they contribute to. its unhelpful and adds fuel to the fire of emotion-first "my pain justifies being an asshole, if you want me to be kinder you just don't get my suffering" trans infighting, and no matter how good it feels i do not think it is right! it hurts all of us whether directly or indirectly because it contributes to a toxic culture, and it is genuinely poison to organizing socially and politically against patriarchy.
but also, on a practical level (which as a pragmatist i do not think is actually separate from the ethical level), its a bad fucking look! it is weird and shitty that people are so invested in coming up with catty little insults, or just adopting pre-existing slurs, to describe trans people they think are being transmisogynistic instead of just saying they are being transmisogynistic, and i think it is illustrative of the trends prevalent in the "transandrophobia isn't real" sphere that this is a thing people engage in and defend so much. if you agree with that point, you should understand that turning around and calling trans women "birthday girls" weakens that criticism! it makes it look hypocritical and easily written off!
when done right, taking the moral high ground should strengthen your arguments by making it so that people cannot argue you are being cruel or vindictive or bigoted when you make your point. it may be less satisfying but it is all around better for all of us. if you genuinely want there to be less cruelty from trans people towards trans people, you have to take some responsibility for the role you play in that. we all do! if The Discourse is really pissing you off, find ways to process that anger and frustration and pain that don't contribute to the very thing causing them in the first place.
any insult that can be boiled down to "you're not special and you need to stop acting like you are" doesn't address the core issue that the things they say make others feel not special. or human. or whatever. it's just bickering about who matters less.
btw i have seen some people using ''birthday girl'' to refer to transphobic trans women and i Do Not Like That. don't do that shit.
primarily because i think its fucking weird to have catty little insults for trans people we disagree with, even and perhaps especially when we disagree with them over actually harmful things they've done or rhetoric they contribute to. its unhelpful and adds fuel to the fire of emotion-first "my pain justifies being an asshole, if you want me to be kinder you just don't get my suffering" trans infighting, and no matter how good it feels i do not think it is right! it hurts all of us whether directly or indirectly because it contributes to a toxic culture, and it is genuinely poison to organizing socially and politically against patriarchy.
but also, on a practical level (which as a pragmatist i do not think is actually separate from the ethical level), its a bad fucking look! it is weird and shitty that people are so invested in coming up with catty little insults, or just adopting pre-existing slurs, to describe trans people they think are being transmisogynistic instead of just saying they are being transmisogynistic, and i think it is illustrative of the trends prevalent in the "transandrophobia isn't real" sphere that this is a thing people engage in and defend so much. if you agree with that point, you should understand that turning around and calling trans women "birthday girls" weakens that criticism! it makes it look hypocritical and easily written off!
when done right, taking the moral high ground should strengthen your arguments by making it so that people cannot argue you are being cruel or vindictive or bigoted when you make your point. it may be less satisfying but it is all around better for all of us. if you genuinely want there to be less cruelty from trans people towards trans people, you have to take some responsibility for the role you play in that. we all do! if The Discourse is really pissing you off, find ways to process that anger and frustration and pain that don't contribute to the very thing causing them in the first place.
#get peer reviewed#also for fuck's sake do NOT pull out any variation of feminazi.#i've seen it once or twice and if you pull that shit you are being a bigot#incredibly counterproductive and DEEPLY embarassing.#no I don't care what they said to you don't fucking do it.
get peer reviewed x2
never let your opponent dictate what the moral high road is, but that doesn't mean you stop giving a fuck about morality. taking a firm ethical stance on how you engage with other people, especially other oppressed people, will ALWAYS do a million times more for actual liberation than the cathartic mud-slinging ever will. you are hurting everyone when you pull this kind of bullshit.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Politicians keep pushing surveillance state legislation "for the children" like, bitch, none of us can afford children, what the hell are you talking about
Started The Obelisk Gate. First impressions, as always, are "wow, Jemisin really does never miss".
I'm not sure if it's style or skill or what, but her books so far have been just so fun to jump right into and start exploring. I'm realizing how I finished The Fifth Season in a single week- I just devour this because it's that good. Almost like Antimony devouring Alabaster's limbs.
It’s skill. She does shit w her prose I’ve never seen anyone else do and I catch new shit every reread in just how she shapes her writing.
I wanted a black Tolkien and Jemisin really is the closest I've found to that. This living, breathing world that moves and shifts even when I'm not looking at it, the characters and how they move both the plot and each other, not only am I itching to get through to the end because I really have a difficult time predicting where it's going in an exciting way- but I also am interested now in her other books because man. If these are just that good, I hope her others are equally show-stopping. I know it's the only trilogy to have ever won a Hugo award for all three books at publish, but man, it's also not hard to see why. These books are GOOD good.
I can vouch for the Great Cities duology* at least. It gets very poetic with its language, and does great things with switching between multiple characters with very different voices. And it's funny.
*That also was planned as a trilogy but it got a little close to the real world. Which, I just think it's great, since comparing Jemisin to Tolkien is inevitable, where he spent his whole life tinkering with and arguing about the one trilogy she keeps writing new ones.
Hell yes! I love to see people reading The Broken Earth Trilogy! I can't recommend the books enough; they really are something special. I read these books back in 2017 or 2018 and they're still my #1 recommendation for people looking for something to read. I love the way we get bits and pieces of fractured lore through excerpts from in world articles/letters/quotes and how those start to contradict themselves if you pay attention and how elegantly this writing choice shows how information is manipulated to tell an untrue narrative about an oppressed minority group & the way of the world.
It is truly worth everyone's while to check these books out. And if comics are your thing N. K. Jemisin also did a stand alone run of The Green Lantern called Far Sector. I haven't read it yet but the art looks fantastic and I've heard very good things.
The juxtaposition of these tweets...
Started The Obelisk Gate. First impressions, as always, are "wow, Jemisin really does never miss".
I'm not sure if it's style or skill or what, but her books so far have been just so fun to jump right into and start exploring. I'm realizing how I finished The Fifth Season in a single week- I just devour this because it's that good. Almost like Antimony devouring Alabaster's limbs.
It’s skill. She does shit w her prose I’ve never seen anyone else do and I catch new shit every reread in just how she shapes her writing.
I wanted a black Tolkien and Jemisin really is the closest I've found to that. This living, breathing world that moves and shifts even when I'm not looking at it, the characters and how they move both the plot and each other, not only am I itching to get through to the end because I really have a difficult time predicting where it's going in an exciting way- but I also am interested now in her other books because man. If these are just that good, I hope her others are equally show-stopping. I know it's the only trilogy to have ever won a Hugo award for all three books at publish, but man, it's also not hard to see why. These books are GOOD good.
I can vouch for the Great Cities duology* at least. It gets very poetic with its language, and does great things with switching between multiple characters with very different voices. And it's funny.
*That also was planned as a trilogy but it got a little close to the real world. Which, I just think it's great, since comparing Jemisin to Tolkien is inevitable, where he spent his whole life tinkering with and arguing about the one trilogy she keeps writing new ones.
All gays will go to hellsite
What if in hellsite but not gay
NO!
String identified: A ga g t t at t t t ga T tag g a Ag agag Acctac ! T tag g a Ag agag Acctac
Closest match: Psylliodes chrysocephala genome assembly, chromosome: 4 Common name: Cabbage Stem Flea Beetle
(image source)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I worry a little bit that people who refuse to learn about ai as a part of their anti ai position are going to be extremely unprepared to understand what’s actually scary about it and already have their digital literacy at risk tbh
not that I am some genius in this regard but if you follow ai developments even slightly you might change the things you are most worried about. do people know the extent to which ai is already eating itself and how meaningless this is making swaths of the internet. do people know that there are plenty of random mid-sized companies today buying their employees’ likenesses to create digital clones and using these to make hundreds of videos. I am so much more worried about labor and surveillance and abuse than people becoming lazy about writing emails. and idk man I sort of like and respect people who are willfully ignorant about it as a way of minimizing its force in their lives and I am in some ways jealous but also when I see posts that basically still boil down to “chatgpt will never fool me” I am like 😭😭😭 for one thing not the only thing to be concerned about, for another thing I am really sorry but I don’t think you’re right
Judge Williams: "[T]his was an attempt to use the Court to provide some legitimacy to an agreement to confer immunity to people and entities
In the end, what all of this mostly does is add to the chain of rulings that confirm that (1) Donald Trump is violating laws with reckless abandon, (2) his hand-picked toadies are violating those same laws with the same abandon, and (3) every federal courtroom in America save for the fanciest and crookedest one knows it.
Judge Kathleen Williams singles out Trump crony Todd Blanche in particular.
This might be controversial to say but a lot of people, mostly cis but some trans people do it too, see their partner coming out as nonbinary not as an important part of their life and an evolution of their identity and the couple's relationship but instead as a. . . phase. Something to tolerate and "allow" until their partner "gets over it" all while they pretend to be supportive. This tends to get overlooked a lot, because they often use their partner's pronouns and name, but there is a point where that "indulgence" for their partner's "whims" turns to tolerance and then to impatience and then to anger, especially if their partner wants to medically/legally transition or come out to other people.
This is especially obvious to me personally with cishet men who are "fine" with their partners coming out as nonbinary until those partners want to take hormones or have surgery or even asks that they not be so attached to the label of straight when in a relationship with someone who isn't a woman. It all comes down to the fact that they were just putting up with their partners' identities and the moment they're affected, then it's time for the "game" to be over.
And my fellow nonbinary peeps, if you feel like your partner is just indulging your identity without actually respecting it, then you're probably right.
one of my creative writing professors once said that to evaluate a work as good or not, first you ask what the work is attempting to do, and then you evaluate how well it does it. and this is how to judge everything from critical essays to romance novels to snack packaging to theory tracts.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
mobility aids and glasses should be free for everyone
people need those to live
MEDICATION SHOULD ALSO BE FREE ACTUALLY. PEOPLE ALSO NEED THAT TO LIVE
ok i get the sentiment from people in the notes and i do agree with it but this is specifically a disability post
THANK YOU
PBS and NPR were never beholden to the US government.
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting was created so that the US government could fund public media without public media being influenced by the government. It was a private non-profit funded by the government, not a part of the government itself. This is by design. This was a good thing. It meant that even small local TV and radio stations, could afford to create media for the public good, without government influence.
This meant TV and radio stations for poor communities. For non-english speaking communities. For rural communities. For minorities. It meant that free and accessible media could be created for everyone, even if the government didn't like it.
That's why conservatives defunded it.
Because if they couldn't control it, and if it helped the people they hated, then they would have to destroy it. Do you really think that a fascist government would defund their own propaganda machine?
Not only is the idea that PBS before being defunded was propaganda wrong, but ignores the fact that defunding it is going to have long-term negative effects on vulnerable communities.
OP of the post in the screenshot called me an idiot and blocked me for pointing this out. So I'm setting the record straight. The CPB was never our enemy.