Oooooooh that's actually a take on the whole thing I'd never thought of before. Works very well though, especially given that Emizel, on average, seems...less susceptible to Shilo's whole Innocence perk thing from this point on whereas Arthur isn't fully. Makes sense he would be after that whole mindfuck.
But yeah, there are literally so many other parts of that scene that are Insane. Shilo remembering that they're probably brothers and reacting to that by going silent and poking Emizel. Emizel grabbing Shilo in response. Shilo explicitly telling Emizel that he'll make Soda into whatever he wants. There's this one specific fucking line Arthur has outside of the motel, talking to Shilo, where he says, verbatim, "I can tell that you have been untouched by the evils in this world, in this life and in the unlife. If you're not careful, it will corrupt you." and then Grizzly specifies that Arthur pointedly looks at Emizel before continuing "Maybe it already has." and I don't know how Anybody interprets that in a way that isn't. Extremely weird.
And that's all not even talking about Emizel suggesting they feed on a threesome as a bonding experience (somebody's Totally Not salty about being left out). Which Charlie then adds a cuck to, that he names "Greg Fore" as a reference to Grefgore. Which would obviously draw a metaphorical connection between the threesome and the PCs.
Everything said: the JRWI boys are hypocrites for making fun of VTM for making everything about sex, because they are the ones who set the brothers reveal And the official PC banding together thing at the sex motel (this is lighthearted lol)
i have had that exact thought so much lmfaooo for guys who canNOT stop making come jokes, they sure have a lot to say about vtm's interest in sexuality. as though vampires haven't been That Way since time immemorial. all lighthearted of course, but i do think you're right to point out all the weird bits about that (and later) scenes that draw the listener's attention to the weird, variable boundaries between the twins & arthur. like what DOES arthur mean when he says that about shilo already being corrupted? that could be interpreted so many different ways, but you're right that very few of them are not-weird.
i think this might be coming from my experience in spn (and specifically wincest) fandom, but i can recognize specifically in the suckening a desire to interact with the taboo (because vtm actively encourages that), but a concern about actually doing so. in spn this means there's a lot of focus (in the first couple seasons, at least) on the gothic horror aspect of the show -- familial cycles, eroded boundaries between the brothers deriving from an atypical, codependent childhood, etc. but the second fans point out, 'hey, that stuff is commonly related to incest & intrafamilial sa & csa, are you trying to say something about the brothers' relationship with that,' the showrunners go, 'WHOAAA hey there buddy, looks like we've got a FREAK in the audience, hahaha, we would NEVER do ANYTHING like that. weirdo.' i don't say this with any sort of animosity towards the council, i think that they're publicish figures with a young, oftentimes uncritical audience. i also think they're majority cishet men, which does contribute. but i do think that they're drawn to the taboo that vtm highlights, but are not willing to go far enough to actively engage with it. so you're stuck in this weird limbo where the twins & arthur talk about feeding on a threesome together, but if you point out that that's kind of strange & incestuous (positive), you've crossed the line from Bit into Actuality, which is where most folks fall off.
idk! it's interesting. i love that scene so much. you probably weren't actually asking for council psychoanalysis, but here we are. charlie please don't look over in this corner & see what we're up to, let s2 (whenever that happens) be just as weird and unexamined. i want to feast <3