May 23, 2025
Missouri is the first in the country to send a constitutional amendment to the ballot that would ask voters to ban healthcare for trans yout
Loading...
seen from Congo - Brazzaville
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Singapore
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from Russia
seen from Singapore
seen from Singapore
Missouri is the first in the country to send a constitutional amendment to the ballot that would ask voters to ban healthcare for trans yout
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i think it's a great idea! Missouri Senators finally get one right! Duelling Festivities what a great money maker when future tickets are sold!
EXCELLENT news
This man right here, starting his comment about being raised Catholic and being a patriot, then spoke STRONGLY against the bill.
He's got a trans nibling and is standing here telling #moleg to fuck off. But, yano, politely.
Livestream is happening now
Trans kids are KIDS. They want to do the same things other kids want to do. That they are doing them while trans doesn't make them somehow less of a kid.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
It has to be so embarrassing being a republican. Like...your political leaders don't even try to hide that they are just pulling you around by the nose from one manufactured panic to the next in order to keep you distracted from the ways they are fucking you over.
I dunno. I mean, if the sponsor of a piece of legislation doesn't even know the basics about the current policies or regulations in place with regards to the subject of said legislation, the bill should be tossed.
If you can't be arsed to do even the smallest amount of research before proposing a fucking law, fuck you.
Got an email from my state senator in which he brags about sponsoring a bill to keep trans people from changing their birth certificates. As pointless as it is to try to talk to these people, I sent him a message anyway.
As a trans constituent of yours, I would urge you to reconsider your stance on this subject. To use the example from your email:
"I don’t believe a birth certificate is a living document. You can’t change your place of birth, so why should you be able to change your gender?"
If my place of birth was recorded incorrectly on my birth certificate, I would hope I would be allowed to change it so it was the proper information. Gender is the same thing. It's not that a person is necessarily *changing* their gender, but that they are *correcting* inaccurate information.
As a parent, I'm sure you are aware that when a baby is born, the doctor does not draw up a full genetic panel to view the child's chromosomal makeup before deciding that the baby is a boy or a girl. The doctor glances at the visible genitals and assigns the baby's sex based on what is considered typical for people sharing that configuration of external genitals.
Sometimes the doctor gets it wrong.
Even if doctors *did* perform all that testing and assign the sex based on the child's chromosomes, that *still* doesn't mean the person's gender would be recorded correctly, because gender exists in the brain. It involves how we interact with the world and how the world sees and treats us.
You say a birth certificate is not a living document, yet it is one of the most common documents utilized to verify identity. And other forms of ID—such as driver’s license and passport—base their information off of the sex marker on the birth certificate. If I am still expected to produce my birth certificate for identification as a 45-year-old adult, then it needs to accurately reflect my existence as a 45-year-old adult.
Honestly, I would be in favor of no longer recording sex or gender on the birth certificate. It’s not vital information and, if the number of laws being proposed to limit changes is anything to go by, it’s often not accurate information, so what is the point? And if it *is* considered accurate often enough to be worth putting on there, then perhaps there aren’t enough cases where it’s needing changed that laws should be passed to prevent it.
Either way, your stance on this—record it and force it to be static, accurate or not—is harmful and counterproductive and I would urge you again to reconsider.