British monarchy doesnāt really need modernizing. When it comes to family matters, theyāre fairly modern - 70 years ago Queen have got her way and despite her family wishes married a foreigner, Charles will be the first divorced and remarried king, over 40 years ago Anne rejected a title for her children and her first husband declined a royal title, Kate will be the first British Consort without any royal ancestors. A century ago all of these things wouldāve never happen. Heck, some people had problem because Queen Mother was only a Lady. During that time, Fergie, Sophie, Kate and Meghan wouldāve never become royals, even Diana would have a problem to get publicās approval! These are the sorts of ābreaking rulesā that matter. Not a coat of arms of some D-list actress who married into the family, not her cake flavor (as a matter of a fact, Eugenieās cake was red velvet, havenāt seen anyone saying sheās breaking rules) or whatever else she does.
ā¦ā¦ā¦..
Thank you for your submission.
Completely agree.
The only plus side of this match is that there is a biracial princess. Thatās good modernising.
A pity that sheās also brought the Hollywood lifestyle - PR, exorbitant spending/merching and posing. Not what you think of when you think good modernising.
